LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,023
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,698
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid, Jaweek, Ibrahim, Haghighat, Neda, Safarpour, Mohammad Mostafa, Sakhti, Shima, Moeinvaziri, Nader. (1403). Comparing the Effect of Single Anastomosis Sleeve- Jejunal Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss and Metabolic Comorbidities among Patients with Morbid Obesity. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(4), 276-280. doi: 10.30476/ijns.2024.103060.1330
Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Ibrahim Jaweek; Neda Haghighat; Mohammad Mostafa Safarpour; Shima Sakhti; Nader Moeinvaziri. "Comparing the Effect of Single Anastomosis Sleeve- Jejunal Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss and Metabolic Comorbidities among Patients with Morbid Obesity". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9, 4, 1403, 276-280. doi: 10.30476/ijns.2024.103060.1330
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid, Jaweek, Ibrahim, Haghighat, Neda, Safarpour, Mohammad Mostafa, Sakhti, Shima, Moeinvaziri, Nader. (1403). 'Comparing the Effect of Single Anastomosis Sleeve- Jejunal Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss and Metabolic Comorbidities among Patients with Morbid Obesity', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(4), pp. 276-280. doi: 10.30476/ijns.2024.103060.1330
Hosseini, Seyed Vahid, Jaweek, Ibrahim, Haghighat, Neda, Safarpour, Mohammad Mostafa, Sakhti, Shima, Moeinvaziri, Nader. Comparing the Effect of Single Anastomosis Sleeve- Jejunal Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss and Metabolic Comorbidities among Patients with Morbid Obesity. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 9(4): 276-280. doi: 10.30476/ijns.2024.103060.1330

Comparing the Effect of Single Anastomosis Sleeve- Jejunal Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Weight Loss and Metabolic Comorbidities among Patients with Morbid Obesity

International Journal of Nutrition Sciences
مقاله 4، دوره 9، شماره 4، اسفند 2024، صفحه 276-280    اصل مقاله (292.42 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijns.2024.103060.1330
نویسندگان
Seyed Vahid Hosseini1؛ Ibrahim Jaweek1؛ Neda Haghighat2؛ Mohammad Mostafa Safarpour1؛ Shima Sakhti1؛ Nader Moeinvaziri* 2
1Colorectal Research Center, Department of Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Laparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Background: The rise in morbid obesity has prompted the development of new bariatric surgery techniques, including the Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SASJ). This study aimed to compare the effects of SASJ and conventional Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) on weight loss, biochemical markers, and comorbidities and to provide essential insights
for tailored interventions.
Methods: In a multicenteric observational-analytical retrospective cohort study from January 2019 to January 2024 at Faghihi, Mother and Child and Abou Ali Sina hospitals in Shiraz, Southern Iran; 61 patients (32 underwent SASJ and 29 underwent SG) were enrolled to assess weight, anthropometric indices, lipid profile and metabolic outcome.
Results: Both SASJ and SG groups showed significant reductions in mean body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001); a significant decrease in mean waist circumference [SASJ from 115.76±11.72 to 84.12±12.87 (p<0.001); SG from 126.68±10.44 to 98.95±11.37 (p<0.001)]. Significant improvements were noted in triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels among both groups, while the SASJ group showed changes in LDL cholesterol too. Both SASJ and SG groups demonstrated a significant improvement in patients with
type II diabetes mellitus (p=0.017 and p=0.046, respectively).
Conclusion: Both procedures significantly could reduce weight and improve comorbidities; however, SASJ was shown to have more benefits, especially in reduction of waist circumference and improvement of lipid profile.

تازه های تحقیق

Seyed Vahid Hosseini (Google Scholar)

Nader Moeinvaziri (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Single anastomosis sleevejejunal bypass؛ Sleeve gastrectomy؛ Weight loss؛ Metabolic comorbidities
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 242
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 169


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب