پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,092 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,022 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 27,186,064 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,458,111 |
Relationship between Kolb’s Learning Styles and Readiness for E-learning: A Cross-sectional Study in the Covid-19 Pandemic | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 14، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 53، شهریور 2023، صفحه 99-107 اصل مقاله (607.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.97515.1200 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sareh Mehni1؛ Farshid Chahartangi1؛ Mahsa Tahergorabi2؛ Neda Dastyar* 3؛ Akbar Mehralizadeh4؛ Azimeh Amirmijani5 | ||
| 1Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Statistics, School of Medicine, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran | ||
| 5Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Significant changes have occurred in education, including the emergence of E-learning which appeared to be an alternative method of carrying out teaching and learning activities. This research seeks to examine the correlation between Kolb’s learning styles and readiness for e-learning. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiroft University of Medical Sciences (southern Iran) in 2021. 247 eligible medical students were selected using convenient sampling. Data were collected using the Watkins standard e-learning questionnaire and Kolb’s learning styles questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 23 using descriptive and inferential statistics (ANOVA and post hoc LSD tests) which were all used to find connections. A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The participants’ mean age was 21.5 (SD: 1.69) years and average score in the e-learning readiness tests was 127.54 (SD: 27.05). According the findings of this study, the learning style of most students was divergent (104 (42.1%)). One-way analysis of variance, showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the average e-learning readiness ratings for various learning styles (F=3.20, P=0.024). Converging style is the top favored learning style among students who are ready for online learning, according to researchers. Conclusion: According to the findings of the study, students’ learning styles were statistically relevant to their readiness for e-learning. The study may be useful for a balanced pedagogical system in both pandemic and post-pandemic situations. University planners need to pay special attention to the students’ learning styles because one of the ways to increase preparation for e-learning is to know the students’ learning style. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Learning؛ Education؛ Kolb’s learning styles؛ E-learning؛ Medical students؛ Covid-19؛ Readiness | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azevedo JP, Hasan A, Goldemberg D, Geven K, Iqbal SA. Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates. World Bank Res Obs. 2021;36(1):1-40. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkab003.
Mathivanan SK, Jayagopal P, Ahmed S, Manivannan S, Kumar P, Raja KT, et al. Adoption of e-learning during lockdown in India. Int J Syst Assur Engin Manag. 2021;14(5):1-10. doi:10.1007/ s13198-021-01072-4.
Oproiu GC. A study about using e-learning platform (Moodle) in university teaching process. Procedia-Social Behavi Sciences. 2015;180(1):426-32. doi:10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.02.140
Manochehr N-N. The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study. Comput High Edu Econ Rev. 2006;18(1):10-4. https://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/ cheer/ch18/manochehr.pdf
Rasheed F, Wahid A. Learning style detection in E-learning systems using machine learning techniques. Exp Sys App. 2021;174(1):114774. doi:10.1016/j. eswa.2021.114774.
Sachan D, Saroha K. A review of adaptive and intelligent online learning systems. ICT Anal App. 2022;5(1):251-62. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5655-2_24 .
Mikić V, Ilić M, Kopanja L, Vesin B. Personalisation methods in e‐learning‐A literature review. Comput App in Engin Edu. 2022;30(6):1931-58. doi:10.1002/ cae.22566.
Wongwatkit C, Panjaburee P, Srisawasdi N, Seprum P. Moderating effects of gender differences on the relationships between perceived learning support, intention to use, and learning performance in a personalized e-learning. J Comput Edu. 2020;7(2):229-55. doi:10.1007/ s40692-020-00154-9.
Fatahi S, Moradi H, Kashani-Vahid L. A survey of personality and learning styles models applied in virtual environments with emphasis on e-learning environments. Artif Intell Rev. 2016;46(3):413-29. doi:10.1007/s10462-016-9469-7. 10 Felder RM. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engin Edu. 2002;78(7):674-81.
Komura D, Ishikawa S. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018;16(1):34-42. doi:10.1016/j. csbj.2018.01.001.
Feldman J, Monteserin A, Amandi A. Automatic detection of learning styles: state of the art. Artif Intell Rev. 2015;44(2):157-86. doi:10.1007/s10462- 014-9422-6 .
Marton F. Phenomenography A research approach to understanding different conceptions of reality. J Thought. 1986;21(1):29-49. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/42589189
Lee S, Kim DH, Chae S-M. Selfdirected learning and professional values of nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;42(1):102647. doi:10.1016/j. nepr.2019.102647.
Manolis C, Burns DJ, Assudani R, Chinta R. Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Learn Indiv Differ. 2013;23(1):44-52. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2012.10.009.
Kolb AY. The Kolb learning style inventory-version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resource Direct. 2005;200(72):166-71.
Willcoxson L, Prosser M. Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (1985): review and further study of validity and reliability. Br J Educ Psychol. 1996;66(2):247-57. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01193.x.
Hydrie MZI, Naqvi SMZH, Alam SN, Jafry SIA. Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory 4.0 and its association with traditional and problem based learning teaching methodologies in medical students. Pakistan J Med Sciences. 2021;37(1):146. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.2275.
Kolb AY, Kolb DA. The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simul & gam. 2009;40(3):297- 327. doi:10.1177/1046878108325713.
Ata R, Cevik M. Exploring relationships between Kolb’s learning styles and mobile learning readiness of pre-service teachers: A mixed study. Educ Inform Tech. 2019;24(2):1351-77. doi:10.1007/ s10639-018-9835-y.
Hejazi Y, Ghiasi A, Rezvanfar A. Study of the relationship between learning styles and tendency to critical thinking in Campus students at Tehran University. Iran J Agricu Econ Devel Res. 2021;1(1):1-10.
Watkins R, Leigh D, Triner D. Assessing readiness for e‐learning. Perfor Improvt Quart. 2004;17(4):66-79. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2004.tb00321.x.
Salari N, Ahmadidarrehsima S, Arbabisarjou A, Dastyar N, Shafei S. Evaluation of learning of students of jiroft university of medical sciences through e-learning during the COVID19 pandemic. Pakistan J Med Health Sciences. 2021;15(4):1-10.
Bayrak M, Aydemir M, Karaman S. An investigation of the learning styles and the satisfaction levels of the distance education students. Cukurova Uni Fac Edu J. 2017;46(1):231-63. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cuefd/issue/28918/310022
Yavuzalp N, Gürol M. E-öğrenme ortamında kullanılan öğrenme stillerinin web kullanım madenciliği ile analizi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;17(2):987-1015. doi:10.17240/ aibuefd.2017.17.30227-326611.
El-Gilany A-H, Abusaad FES. Selfdirected learning readiness and learning styles among Saudi undergraduate nursing students. Nur Edu Today. 2013;33(9):1040- 4. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.003 .
Tuncer M, Dikmen M, Akmençe AE. Investigation of higher education students’ learning styles and attitudes towards mobile learning according to various variables. Int J Soc Scien and Edu Res. 2018;4(3):433-46. doi:10.24289/ ijsser.412095.
Şenyuva EA. Farklı öğrenme stillerine sahip hemşirelik öğrencilerinin e-ders tasarımına ilişkin görüşleri: web tabanlı hasta eğitimi dersi örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;37(1):1-10. https://dergipark. org.tr/en/pub/gefad/issue/31116/337723.
Manochehr N-N. The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study. Comp Hig Edu Econ Rev. 2006;18(1):10-4. https://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/ cheer/ch18/manochehr.pdf.
Zacharis NZ. The effect of learning style on preference for web‐based courses and learning outcomes. British J Edu Tech. 2011; 42(5):790-800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01104.x. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 250 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 285 |
||