LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,044
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,716
Vahdani Asadi, Mohammad Reza, Eskandari, Hossein, Khodabandelou, Rouhollah. (1401). Barriers to the Integration of E-learning in an Iranian Education System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), 10-21. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.94775.1144
Mohammad Reza Vahdani Asadi; Hossein Eskandari; Rouhollah Khodabandelou. "Barriers to the Integration of E-learning in an Iranian Education System". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 1, 1401, 10-21. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.94775.1144
Vahdani Asadi, Mohammad Reza, Eskandari, Hossein, Khodabandelou, Rouhollah. (1401). 'Barriers to the Integration of E-learning in an Iranian Education System', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(1), pp. 10-21. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.94775.1144
Vahdani Asadi, Mohammad Reza, Eskandari, Hossein, Khodabandelou, Rouhollah. Barriers to the Integration of E-learning in an Iranian Education System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 14(1): 10-21. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.94775.1144

Barriers to the Integration of E-learning in an Iranian Education System

Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
مقاله 2، دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 52، خرداد 2023، صفحه 10-21    اصل مقاله (1.06 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2023.94775.1144
نویسندگان
Mohammad Reza Vahdani Asadi* 1؛ Hossein Eskandari1؛ Rouhollah Khodabandelou2
1Department of Education, University of Bojnord, Iran
2Instructional learning and Technology Department, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
چکیده
Background: Some people expect that the quality of teaching and learning will be improved by using technology, while empirical evidence has proven the opposite. But education is too complicated to improve its quality simply by employing new technologies. The purpose of this study is to investigate the barriers to the use of ICT in primary school in North Khorasan province in early 2021 academic years.
Methods: To do so, we used a mixed method. In the qualitative part of the study, interview questions were identified using scientific resources and focal group. Then, 14 primary teachers and experts, who had experience of working in a school with minimal ICT equipment were selected using purposeful sampling. The exclusion criterion was the subjects’ unwillingness to continue cooperation. The qualitative data were analyzed using Colaizzi method. Based on qualitative findings, a researcher-made questionnaire with 22 items and 6 subscales was developed. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts, and its reliability was obtained from 0.61 to 0.92 for its various parts. To ensure the accuracy of the questionnaire, we performed exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis on the questionnaire. In the quantitative part of the study, the sample was randomly selected according to the size and access to technology in the classroom.
Results: Quantitative analyses revealed that there was a negative association (r=-0.182; P=0.021) between the teaching-learning quality and the use of emerging technology. Regression test showed that the most important barrier to the ICT use in school was “Equipment and infrastructure” (β=-0.256; P<0.001) and then the “Budget and monetary resources” (β=-0.148; P=0.053), “Teachers’ self-confidence” (β=-0.119; P=0.137), and “Teachers’ knowledge and skill” (β=-0.058; P=0.473).
Conclusion: The quality of teaching and learning is not improved by the mere presence of ICT equipment. Based on the findings of the current study, if the managers intend to remove the obstacles related to the integration of ICT in education, they have to provide sufficient “Equipment and infrastructure” and “Budget and monetary resources”, and plan for improving “Teachers’ selfconfidence” and “Teachers’ knowledge and skill”.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ICT؛ barriers to ICT use؛ Primary Schools؛ emerging technologies
مراجع
Adams  P.  ICT  and  pedagogy: opportunities  missed?  Educ  3–13 [Inter net]. 2011;39(1):21–33. Available f rom: doi: 10.1080/030 0 4279.2010.492353.
Zheng J, Li S. What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. Int J Educ Res. 2020;102:101612. 
Lysen ko L, Abram i PC, Wade CA, Ma rsh JP, WaGioko M, Kiforo E. Promoting young Kenyans’ growth in literacy with educational technology: A tale of two years of implementation. Int J Educ Res. 2 019; 9 5:176 – 89.  
Amez S, Baert S. Smartphone use and academic performance: A literature review. Int J Educ Res. 2020;103:101618. 
Mora T, Escardíbul J-O, Di Pietro G. Computers and students’ achievement: An analysis of the One Laptop per Child 
program in Catalonia. Int J Educ Res. 2018;9 2:145 –57.  
Mercer N, Hennessy S, Warwick P. Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. Int J Educ Res. 2019 Jan 1;97:187–99. 
Nguyen T. The effectiveness of online lea r n i ng: Beyond no sig n i ficant dif ference and future horizons. MERLOT J Online Learn Teach. 2015;11(2):309–19. 
Sancho-Gil JM, Rivera-Vargas P, Miño- Puigcercós  R.  Moving  beyond  the predictable failure of Ed-Tech initiatives. Learn Media Technol. 2020;45(1):61–75. 
Cherner T, Mitchell C. Deconstructing EdTech frameworks based on their creators, features, and usefulness. Learn Media Technol. 2021;46(1):91–116. 
Mertala P. Paradoxes of participation in the digitalization of education: A narrative account. Learn Media Technol. 2020;45(2):179–92. 
King M, Forsey M, Pegrum M. Southern agency and digital education: an ethnography of open online learning in Dili, Timor-Leste. Learn Media Technol. 2019;4 4(3):283 – 98. 
Shohel MMC, Kirkwood A. Using technology for enhancing teaching and learning in Bangladesh: challenges and consequences. Learn Media Technol. 2012;37(4):414 –28. 
Hills H, Overton L. Why do e-learning projects fail. Brief Pap Towar Matur March, London. 2010; 
Bowen  WG,  Chingos  MM,  Lack KA, Nygren TI. Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. Ithaka S+ R. 2012;22:1–53. 
Scott-Jackson W, Owens S, Saldana M, Charles L, Green M, Woodman P, et al. LEARNING TO LEAD. 2015; 
Chang Y-H, Lu T-Y, Fang R-J. An adaptive elearning system based on intelligent agents. In: Proc of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied  21
Computer Science. Citeseer; 2007. p. 200 –5. 
Clark RE. Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Rev Educ Res [Internet]. 1983 Dec 30;53(4):445–59. Available from: http://journals.sagepub. com /doi /10.3102/0 03465430530 0 4 4 45
Siemens G, Tittenberger P. Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. University of Manitoba Canada; 2009. 
Singh A, Gupta K, Yadav VK. Adopting e-learning facilities during COVID-19: Exploring perspectives of teachers working in Indian Public-funded Elementary Schools. Educ 3-13. 2021;1–15. 
Collado ZC, Rodriguez VR, Dueñas III ZD. Children’s engagement in self- learning  modules  (SLMs)  amid  the pandemic: a predictive analysis on the role of internet access, household food security, and parental involvement to modular classes. Educ 3-13. 2021;1–14. 
Parczewska T. Difficult situations and ways of coping with them in the experiences of parents homeschooling their children du r i ng  t he  COV I D -19  pa nde m ic  i n  Pola nd .  Educ 3-13. 2021;49(7):889–900. 
Colaizzi  PF.  Psychological  research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, Mark K, editors. Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford University Press; 1978. p. 48–71. 
Williamson B. Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage; 2017. 
Saari A, Säntti J. The rhetoric of the ‘digital leap’in Finnish educational policy documents. Eur Educ Res J. 2018;17(3):442–57. 
Pantzos P. The integration of ICT in educational process in IB education—A comparative case study. New Trends Issues Proc Hu ma n it Soc Sci. 2019;6(1):192 –204. 
Alirezabeigi S, Masschelein J, Decuypere 
M. Investigating digital doings through breakdowns: a sociomaterial ethnography of a Bring Your Own Device school. Learn Media Technol. 2020;45(2):193–207. 
Plumb M, Kautz K. Barriers to the integration of information technology within early childhood education and care organisations: A review of the literature. arXiv Prepr arXiv160600748. 2016; 
Salam S, Zeng J, Pathan ZH, Latif Z, Shaheen A. Impediments to the integration of ICT in public schools of contemporary societies: A review of literature. J Inf Process Syst. 2018;14(1):252–69. 
Spiteri M, Rundgren S-NC. Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Tech nol K nowl Lea r n. 2020;25(1):115 –28. 
Nikolopoulou K, Gialamas V. Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions. J Comput Educ. 2016;3(1):59 –75. 
Al Mofarreh YI. Implementation of ICT policy in secondary schools in Saudi Arabia [Internet]. University of Wollongong; 2016. Available from: https:// ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4718
L a w r e n c e  J E ,  Ta r  UA .  F a c t o r s  t h a t  i n fl u e n c e  teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. EMI Educ Media Int. 2018;55(1):79–105. 
Ghavifekr S, Rosdy WAW. Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. Int J Res Educ Sci. 2015;1(2):175–91. 
Prasojo LD, Habibi A, Yaakob MFM, Mukminin A, Haswindy S, Sofwan 
M. An Explanatory Sequential Study on Indonesian Principals’ Perceptions on ICT Integration Barriers. Electron J e -L e a r n i ng. 2019;17(1):1–10. 
Aslan A, Zhu C. Starting teachers’ integration of ICT into their teaching practices in the lower secondary schools in Tu rkey. Educ Sci T heor y Pract. 2018;18(1).

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 212
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 221


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب