تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,485 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,274 |
Effectiveness of Hesabyar Cognitive Rehabilitation on Neuropsychological Functions of Children with Special Learning Disabilities | ||
International Journal of School Health | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 36، دی 2022، صفحه 249-256 اصل مقاله (236.94 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Article (s) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/intjsh.2022.95938.1241 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mojtaba Ebrahimi1؛ Fereshteh Baezzat* 2؛ Vahid Nejati3؛ Soheila Hashemi2 | ||
1Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
2Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
3Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: Children with learning disabilities have cognitive impairments not attributable to their intelligence. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Hesabyar Cognitive Rehabilitation on neuropsychological functions of children with special learning disabilities. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study which had pre-test and post-test design and conducted with a control group. The statistical population included all the male elementary students with special learning disabilities in Semnan, Iran, in the academic year 2019-2020. The sample consisted of 40 students (20 participants in each group) with special learning disabilities that were treated. The Conners Psychological Scale was used for data collection. The experimental group underwent cognitive load rehabilitation every other day for 10 sessions while the control group did not receive any treatment. The data were analyzed using the statistical method of multivariate analysis of covariance and SPSS version 24. Results: The mean±SD of age in the experimental group and the control group were respectively 11.2±0.9 and 11.5±0.8. The results of ANCOVA analysis showed that Hesabyar Cognitive Rehabilitation program made significant changes in components of variables, including selective attention (P=0.002), sustain attention (P=0.001), attention shifting (P=0.001), attention divided (P=0.004), attention span (P=0.002) l-term memory (P=0.011) [components of difficulty in memory function and learning], executive functions (P=0.001), problem with speed and cognitive processing ability (P=0.016), as well as components of academic performance problems, namely attention functions (P=0.004), computational science (P=0.002), argument/calculations (P=0.014), and attitudinal discussions (P=0.001) [components of academic performance problems: mathematics]. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, Hesabyar Cognitive Rehabilitation program is one of the treatments that can be used to minimize the problems of students with math learning disorders. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Hesabyar cognitive rehabilitation؛ Psychopsychological functions؛ Specific learning disorders | ||
مراجع | ||
1. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington DC: American Association; 2013. ## 2. Giuliani F, Jacquemettaz M. Animal-assisted therapy used for anxiety disorders in patients with learning disabilities: An observational study. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2017;14:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.08.004. ## 3. Gray SA, Chaban P, Martinussen R, Goldberg R, Gotlieb H, Kronitz R, et al. Effects of a computerized working memory training program on working memory, attention, and academics in adolescents with severe LD and comorbid ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53(12):1277-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02592.x. PubMed PMID: 22978357. ## 4. Wong TTY, Ho CSH, Tang J. Identification of children with mathematics learning disabilities (MLD) using Latent class growth analysis. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;35(11):2906-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.015. PubMed PMID: 25104225. ## 5. Shamsi A, Abedi A, Samadi M, Ahmadzadeh M. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of psychological and educational interventions to improve academic performance of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2013;2(4):61-81. doi: jld-2-4-92-5-4. Persian. ## 6. Brunoni AR, Vanderhasselt MA. Working memory improvement with noninvasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn. 2014;86:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc. 2014.01.008. PubMed PMID: 24514153. ## 7. Bryant BR, Bryant DP. Introduction to the special series: Mathematics and learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2008;31(1):3-8. doi: 10.2307/30035521. ## 8. Fletcher JM, Grigorenko EL. Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: The past and the future. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(9-10):930-940. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001084. PubMed PMID: 29198282; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6249682. ## 9. Dehghani Y, Afshin SA, Keykhosrovani M. Effectiveness of Neuropsychological Therapy on Executive Functions and Educational Performance of Students with Dyscalculia. J Child Ment Health. 2017;3(4):14-25. Persian. ## 10. Mirmahdi SR, Shojaei F. Evaluating and Comparing Neuropsychological Skills Profile in Normal Students, Students with Specific Learning Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Students. Neuropsychology. 2016;2(6):91-106. Persian. ## 11. Biotteau M, Albaret JM, Lelong S, Chaix Y. Neuropsychological status of French children with developmental dyslexia and/or developmental coordination disorder: Are both necessarily worse than one? Child Neuropsychol. 2017;23(4):422-441. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1127339. PubMed PMID: 26729293. ## 12. Ji L, Zhao Q, Gu H, Chen Y, Zhao J, Jiang X, et al. Effect of Executive Function on Event-Based Prospective Memory for Different Forms of Learning Disabilities. Front Psychol. 2021;12:528883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.528883. PubMed PMID: 33746809; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7973034. ## 13. Fenwick ME, Kubas HA, Witzke JW, Fitzer KR, Miller DC, Maricle DE, et al. Neuropsychological profiles of written expression learning disabilities determined by concordance-discordance model criteria. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2016;5(2):83-96. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2014.993396. PubMed PMID: 25671391. ## 14. Crisci G, Caviola S, Cardillo R, Mammarella IC. Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Comorbidity Overlaps Between Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder and Specific Learning Disorders. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 10;15:594234. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.594234. PMID: 33732121; PMCID: PMC7958764. ## 15. Toll SW, Van der Ven SH, Kroesbergen EH, Van Luit JE. Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities. 2011;44(6):521-32. ## 16. Abedi A, Malekpour M, Moulavi H, Oraizi H, Amiri S. Neuropsychological Aspects of Preschoolers with and without Neuropsychological/Developmental Learning Disabilities. JOEC. 2008;8(1):1-18. doi: 20.1001.1.16826612.1387.8.1.1.8. Persian. ## 17. Ghalamzan Sh, Moradi MR, Abedi A. Comparison of executive functions profile and attention of normal children and children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities. 2014;3(4):111-99. Persian. ## 18. Johnson S, Strauss V, Gilmore C, Jaekel J, Marlow N, Wolke D. Learning disabilities among extremely preterm children without neurosensory impairment: Comorbidity, neuropsychological profiles and scholastic outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2016;103:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.07.009. PubMed PMID: 27517525. ## 19. Isanejadbushehri S, Dadashpur ahangar M, Salmabadi H, Ashoori J, Dashtbozorgi Z. The effect of computer games on sustain attention and working memory in elementary boy students with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorders. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2016;59(5):311-321. doi: 10.22038/mjms.2016.9301. Persian. ## 20. Kesler SR, Lacayo NJ, Jo B. A pilot study of an online cognitive rehabilitation program for executive function skills in children with cancer-related brain injury. Brain Injury. 2011;25(1):101-112. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.536194. ## 21. Dahlin K. Working memory training and the effect on mathematical achievement in children with attention deficits and special needs. Journal of Education and Learning. 2013;2(1):118-123. doi: 10.5539/jel.v2n1p118. ## 22. Bayatiani GK, Hafezi F, Asgari P, Naderi F. Comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral play therapy and theory of mind training on cognitive flexibility of students with specific learning disabilities and comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as a moderator. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2020;22(3):24-36. doi: 10.30699/icss.22.3.24. Persian. ## 23. Conners CK, Epstein JN, Angold A, Klaric J. Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2004;31(5):555-62. doi: 10.1023/A:1025457300409. PubMed PMID: 14561062. ## 24. Jadidi M, Abedi A. Adaptation and standardization of Conners Neuropsychology Questionnaire for children aged 5 to 12 years in Isfahan. J Modern Edu Approach. 2011;3(1):56-71. Persian. ## 25. Willcutt EG, Boada R, Riddle MW, Chhabildas N, DeFries JC, Pennington BF. Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire: Validation of a Parent-Report Screening Measure. Psychol Assess. 2011;23(3):778–91. doi: 10.1037/a0023290. PubMed PMID: 21574721; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3164385. ## 26. Yavari M, Yariari F, Rastegarpour H. Computer-assisted Instructional Software (Hesabyar) for Teaching Mathematics to Students with Dyscalculia. JOEC. 2006;6(3):713-734. doi: 20.1001.1.16826612.1385.6.3.1.8. Persian. ## 27. Bayrami M, Nazari M, Hashemi T, Movahedi Y. The Effectiveness of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Treatment on the Continuous Attention Function of Students with Dyscalculia. Community Health Journal. 2017;10(3):45-52. Persian. ## 28. Veloso A, Vicente SG, Filipe MG. Effectiveness of cognitive training for school-aged children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02983. PubMed PMID: 32010026; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6971402. ## 29. Graham S. Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Learning Disabilities (LD), and executive functioning: Recommendations for future research. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2017;50:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.001.## 30. Chu FW, vanMarle K, Hoard MK, Nugent L, Scofield JE, Geary DC. Preschool deficits in cardinal knowledge and executive function contribute to longer-term mathematical learning disability. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019;188:104668. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104668. PubMed PMID: 31430570. ## 31. Benavides-Varela S, Callegher CZ, Fagiolini B, Leo I, Altoe G, Lucangeli D. Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education. 2020;157:103953. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953. ## 32. Ota KR, DuPaul GJ. Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly. 2002;17(3):242-257. doi: 10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881. ## | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 267 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 343 |