LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,582
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,401
Mafi, Majid, Radfar, Shokoufeh. (1401). High Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Connectivity-Based Diagnosis of ADHD. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(6), 645-654. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2108-1380
Majid Mafi; Shokoufeh Radfar. "High Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Connectivity-Based Diagnosis of ADHD". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 6, 1401, 645-654. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2108-1380
Mafi, Majid, Radfar, Shokoufeh. (1401). 'High Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Connectivity-Based Diagnosis of ADHD', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(6), pp. 645-654. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2108-1380
Mafi, Majid, Radfar, Shokoufeh. High Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Connectivity-Based Diagnosis of ADHD. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 12(6): 645-654. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2108-1380

High Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for EEG Connectivity-Based Diagnosis of ADHD

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 12، شماره 6، اسفند 2022، صفحه 645-654    اصل مقاله (1.54 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2108-1380
نویسندگان
Majid Mafi* 1؛ Shokoufeh Radfar2
1PhD, Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Behavioural Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children and adults and its early detection is effective in the successful treatment of children. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been widely used for classifying ADHD and normal children. In recent years, deep learning leads to more accurate classification. 
Objective: This study aims to adapt convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for classifying ADHD and normal children based on the connectivity measure of their EEG signals.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, the dataset consisted of 61 ADHD and 60 normal children from which 13021 epochs were extracted as input for model training and evaluation. Synchronization likelihood (SL) and wavelet coherence (WC) were considered connectivity measures. The neighborhood between EEG channels was arranged in a two-dimensional matrix for better representation. Four-dimensional (4D) and six-dimensional (6D) connectivity tensors were composed as model inputs. Two architectures were developed, one 4D and 6D CNN for SL and WC-based diagnosis of ADHD, respectively. 
Results: A 5-fold cross-validation was utilized to assess developed models. The average accuracy of 98.56% for 4D CNN and 98.85% for 6D CNN in epoch-based classification were obtained. In the case of subject-based classification, the accuracy was 99.17% for both models.  
Conclusion: Based on the evaluation metrics of the proposed models, ADHD children can be diagnosed and ADHD and normal children can be successfully distinguished.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)؛ Functional Connectivity؛ Electroencephalography؛ Neural Networks؛ Deep Learning؛ Artificial Intelligence
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Jasper HH, Solomon P, Bradley C. Electroencephalographic analyses of behavior problem children. Am J Psychiat. 1938;95(3):641-58. doi: 10.1176/ajp.95.3.641.
  2. Magee CA, Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. Examining the diagnostic utility of EEG power measures in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(5):1033-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.12.007. PubMed PMID: 15826843.
  3. Monastra VJ, Lubar JF, Linden M. The development of a quantitative electroencephalographic scanning process for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: reliability and validity studies. Neuropsychology. 2001;15(1):136-44. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.15.1.136. PubMed PMID: 11216884.
  4. Snyder SM, Quintana H, Sexson SB, Knott P, Haque AF, Reynolds DA. Blinded, multi-center validation of EEG and rating scales in identifying ADHD within a clinical sample. Psychiatry Res. 2008;159(3):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.006. PubMed PMID: 18423617.
  5. Ogrim G, Kropotov J, Hestad K. The quantitative EEG theta/beta ratio in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and normal controls: sensitivity, specificity, and behavioral correlates. Psychiatry Res. 2012;198(3):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.041. PubMed PMID: 22425468.
  6. Liechti MD, Valko L, Müller UC, Döhnert M, et al. Diagnostic value of resting electroencephalogram in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Brain Topogr. 2013;26(1):135-51. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0258-6. PubMed PMID: 23053601.
  7. Loo SK, Cho A, Hale TS, McGough J, McCracken J, Smalley SL. Characterization of the theta to beta ratio in ADHD: identifying potential sources of heterogeneity. J Atten Disord. 2013;17(5):384-92. doi: 10.1177/1087054712468050. PubMed PMID: 23264365.
  8. Barry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. Electroencephalogram theta/beta ratio and arousal in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence of independent processes. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(4):398-401. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.027. PubMed PMID: 19500774.
  9. Williams LM, Hermens DF, Thein T, Clark CR, et al. Using brain-based cognitive measures to support clinical decisions in ADHD. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;42(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.08.010. PubMed PMID: 20117748.
  10. Ghassemi F, Hassan_Moradi M, Tehrani-Doost M, Abootalebi V. Using non-linear features of EEG for ADHD/normal participants’ classification. Procedia Soc. 2012;32:148-52. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.024.
  11. Sadatnezhad K, Boostani R, Ghanizadeh A. Classification of BMD and ADHD patients using their EEG signals. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(3):1956-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.128.
  12. Mohammadi MR, Khaleghi A, Nasrabadi AM, et al. EEG classification of ADHD and normal children using non-linear features and neural network. Biomed Eng Lett. 2016;6(2):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s13534-016-0218-2.
  13. Tor HT, Ooi CP, Lim-Ashworth NS, Wei JKE, et al. Automated detection of conduct disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using decomposition and nonlinear techniques with EEG signals. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105941. PubMed PMID: 33486340.
  14. Mueller A, Candrian G, Grane VA, Kropotov JD, et al. Discriminating between ADHD adults and controls using independent ERP components and a support vector machine: a validation study. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2011;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-5-5. PubMed PMID: 21771289. PubMed PMCID: PMC3149569.
  15. Nazhvani AD, Boostani R, Afrasiabi S, Sadatnezhad K. Classification of ADHD and BMD patients using visual evoked potential. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(11):2329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.08.009. PubMed PMID: 24050849.
  16. Ahmadlou M, Adeli H. Wavelet-synchronization methodology: a new approach for EEG-based diagnosis of ADHD. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2010;41(1):1-10. doi: 10.1177/155005941004100103. PubMed PMID: 20307009.
  17. Chen H, Song Y, Li X. A deep learning framework for identifying children with ADHD using an EEG-based brain network. 2019;356:83-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.04.058.
  18. Sakkalis V, Doru Giurc Neanu C, Xanthopoulos P, Zervakis ME, Tsiaras V, et al. Assessment of linear and nonlinear synchronization measures for analyzing EEG in a mild epileptic paradigm. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009;13(4):433-41. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2008.923141. PubMed PMID: 19273019.
  19. Murias M, Swanson JM, Srinivasan R. Functional connectivity of frontal cortex in healthy and ADHD children reflected in EEG coherence. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(8):1788-99. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl089. PubMed PMID: 17023555. PubMed PMCID: PMC2084383.
  20. Castellanos FX, Aoki Y. Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Science in Development. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1(3):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.004. PubMed PMID: 27713929. PubMed PMCID: PMC5047296.
  21. Debnath R, Miller NV, Morales S, Seddio KR, Fox NA. Investigating brain electrical activity and functional connectivity in adolescents with clinically elevated levels of ADHD symptoms in alpha frequency band. Brain Res. 2021;1750:147142. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147142. PubMed PMID: 33038297. PubMed PMCID: PMC7719075.
  22. Furlong S, Cohen JR, Hopfinger J, Snyder J, Robertson MM, Sheridan MA. Resting-state EEG Connectivity in Young Children with ADHD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021;50(6):746-62. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1796680. PubMed PMID: 32809852. PubMed PMCID: PMC7889746.
  23. Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, et al. Coherence in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and excess beta activity in their EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(7):1472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.006.PubMed PMID: 17502165.
  24. Dupuy FE, Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M. EEG coherence in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: stimulant effects in good responders. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;70(3):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.012. PubMed PMID: 18708101.
  25. Michelini G, Jurgiel J, Bakolis I, Cheung CH, Asherson P, et al. Atypical functional connectivity in adolescents and adults with persistent and remitted ADHD during a cognitive control task. Transl psychiat. 2019;9(1):1-15. doi: 10.1101/201772.
  26. Kiiski H, Rueda-Delgado LM, Bennett M, Knight R, Rai L, et al. Functional EEG connectivity is a neuromarker for adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(1):330-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.010. PubMed PMID: 31506235.
  27. Ahmadlou M, Adeli H, Adeli A. Graph theoretical analysis of organization of functional brain networks in ADHD. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012;43(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/1550059411428555. PubMed PMID: 22423545.
  28. Briels CT, Schoonhoven DN, Stam CJ, De Waal H, Scheltens P, Gouw AA. Reproducibility of EEG functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00632-3. PubMed PMID: 32493476. PubMed PMCID: PMC7271479.
  29. Hata M, Kazui H, Tanaka T, Ishii R, Canuet L, et al. Functional connectivity assessed by resting state EEG correlates with cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease - An eLORETA study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.10.030. PubMed PMID: 26541308.
  30. Van Mierlo P, Papadopoulou M, Carrette E, Boon P, Vandenberghe S, et al. Functional brain connectivity from EEG in epilepsy: seizure prediction and epileptogenic focus localization. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;121:19-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.06.004. PubMed PMID: 25014528.
  31. Van Mierlo P, Höller Y, Focke NK, Vulliemoz S. Network Perspectives on Epilepsy Using EEG/MEG Source Connectivity. Front Neurol. 2019;10:721. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00721. PubMed PMID: 31379703. PubMed PMCID: PMC6651209.
  32. Bočková M, Rektor I. Impairment of brain functions in Parkinson’s disease reflected by alterations in neural connectivity in EEG studies: a viewpoint. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(2):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.11.013.
  33. Peters JM, Taquet M, Vega C, Jeste SS, Fernández IS, et al. Brain functional networks in syndromic and non-syndromic autism: a graph theoretical study of EEG connectivity. BMC Med. 2013;11:54. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-54. PubMed PMID: 23445896. PubMed PMCID: PMC3626634.
  34. O’Reilly C, Lewis JD, Elsabbagh M. Is functional brain connectivity atypical in autism? A systematic review of EEG and MEG studies. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0175870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175870. PubMed PMID: 28467487. PubMed PMCID: PMC5414938.
  35. Wang J, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Chen L, Li Y, Wu L. Increased EEG coherence in long-distance and short-distance connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav. 2020;10(10):e01796. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1796. PubMed PMID: 32815287. PubMed PMCID: PMC7559606.
  36. Chen H, Song Y, Li X. Use of deep learning to detect personalized spatial-frequency abnormalities in EEGs of children with ADHD. J Neural Eng. 2019;16(6):066046. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3a0a. PubMed PMID: 31398717.
  37. Moghaddari M, Lighvan MZ, Danishvar S. Diagnose ADHD disorder in children using convolutional neural network based on continuous mental task EEG. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;197:105738. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105738. PubMed PMID: 32927404.
  38. Ahmadi A, Kashefi M, Shahrokhi H, Nazari MA. Computer aided diagnosis system using deep convolutional neural networks for ADHD subtypes. Biomed Signal Proces. 2020;63:102227. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102227.
  39. Nasrabadi AM, Allahverdy A, Samavati M, Mohammadi MR. EEG data for ADHD / Control children [Internet]. IEEE Dataport; 2020. doi: 10.21227/rzfh-zn36.
  40. Samavati M, Nasrabadi AM, Mohammadi MR. Automatic minimization of eye blink artifacts using fractal dimension of independent components of multichannel EEG. 20th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2012); Tehran, Iran: IEEE; 2012. doi: 10.1109/iraniancee.2012.6292611.
  41. Stam CJ, Van Dijk B. Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 2002;163(3-4):236-51. doi: 10.1016/s0167-2789(01)00386-4.
  42. Lachaux JP, Lutz A, Rudrauf D, Cosmelli D, Le Van Quyen M, et al. Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: an introduction to wavelet coherence. Neurophysiol Clin. 2002;32(3):157-74. doi: 10.1016/s0987-7053(02)00301-5. PubMed PMID: 12162182.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,130
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 656


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب