پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,519 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,425,823 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,296,784 |
Academic Outcomes and Implementation Details of Distance and In-Person Peer Mentoring Programs in Pre-Clinical Undergraduate Medical Settings: A Systematized Review | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 4، اسفند 2021، صفحه 225-237 اصل مقاله (540 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2021.91658.1104 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Zarei Hajiabadi1؛ Roghayeh Gandomkar* 2 | ||
| 1Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 21. Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2. Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Peer mentoring may have a crucial role in the early years of medical school in terms of academic success. The aim of the current research is to review studies that have investigated the role of peer mentoring in the academic performance of undergraduate preclinical medical students. Methods: An online search using related keywords (peer mentor as its variations with medical students and its variations) in SCOPUS, OVID, Eric, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science with no time limit consideration was conducted on 2021/07/07. After eliminating duplicates from retrieved records, the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles were studied, and irrelevant articles were removed based on the predetermined inclusion criteria (mentees from undergraduate medical students in the preclinical phase and reporting academic performance as the outcome of the peer mentoring). Results: Of 294 retrieved records, seven articles remained after the screening and selecting process. Two more articles were also added through hand searching, and nine papers were included in the final analysis. The selected articles were published from 2007 to 2019. Eight articles applied post-only design, and one article used an ex-post facto method. Studies implemented different kinds of peer mentoring models. In most studies, the supportive role of mentors was highlighted. Three studies reported electronic tools for mentoring interactions. Studies reported improvement in mentees’ academic performance in terms of academic success indicators as well as participants’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the program. The overall quality of most articles was low to moderate. Conclusions: The results indicated that there is an improvement in students’ academic performance after participating in peer mentoring programs based on both subjective and objective outcome measures. The results have implications for virtual teaching in the context that there is limited faculty time and probably less motivation for mentoring activities. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Peer mentoring؛ Medical students؛ Systematized review؛ Academic performance؛ Preclinical phase | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Kebaetse MB, Kebaetse M, Mokone GG, Nkomazana O, Mogodi M, Wright J, et al. Learning support interventions for Year 1 medical students: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2018;52(3):263-73. doi:10.1111/medu.13465 McEvoy A, Welker RJJoE, disorders B. Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. J Emot Behav Disord. 2000;8(3):130-140. doi:10.1177/106342660000800301 Yates J. When did they leave, and why? A retrospective case study of attrition on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):43. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-43
Reaume D, Ropp TJCJoHE. Learning in Medical School: Transition Issues, Strategy Use, and Self-Regulation. Can J High Educ. 2005;35(4):27-53. doi:10.47678/cjhe.v35i4.183520.
Dickinson BL, Gibson K, VanDerKolk K, Greene J, Rosu CA, Navedo DD, et al. “It is this very knowledge that makes us doctors”: an applied thematic analysis of how medical students perceive the relevance of biomedical science knowledge to clinical medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02371-3
Marcel FDJBme. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6(1):1-6. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-5.
Buja LMJBme. Medical education today: all that glitters is not gold. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1535-9
Mortaz Hejri S, Mirzazadeh A, Khabaz Mafinejad M, Alizadeh M, Saleh N, Gandomkar R, et al. A decade of reform in medical education: Experiences and challenges at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Med Teach. 2018;40(5):472-80. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1438591
Mirzazadeh A, Gandomkar R, Hejri SM, Hassanzadeh G, Koochak HE, Golestani A, et al. Undergraduate medical education programme renewal: a longitudinal context, input, process and product evaluation study. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5(1):15-23. doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0243-3
Sarraf-Yazdi S, Teo YN, How AEH, Teo YH, Goh S, Kow CS, et al. A Scoping Review of Professional Identity Formation in Undergraduate Medical Education. J Gen Intern Med. 2021:1-11. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07024-9
Salem RO, Al-Mously N, AlFadil S, Baalash AJMt. Pre-admission criteria and pre-clinical achievement: Can they predict medical students performance in the clinical phase? Med Teach. 2016;38(sup1):S26-S30.
Durning SJ, Cleary TJ, Sandars J, Hemmer P, Kokotailo P, Artino ARJAM. Perspective: Viewing “strugglers” through a different lens: How a self-regulated learning perspective can help medical educators with assessment and remediation. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):488-95. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc384
Pinilla S, Pander T, von der Borch P, Fischer MR, Dimitriadis K. 5 years of experience with a large-scale mentoring program for medical students. GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung. JMIR Med Educ. 2015;32(1). doi:10.2196/mededu.5063 Taylor JS, Faghri S, Aggarwal N, Zeller K, Dollase R, Reis SP. Developing a peer-mentor program for medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(1):97-102. doi:10.1080/10401334.2012.741544. Farkas AH, Allenbaugh J, Bonifacino E, Turner R, Corbelli JAJJogim. Mentorship of US medical students: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2602-2609. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05256-4 Asuka ES, Halari CD, Halari MMJASRJfE, Technology,, Sciences. Mentoring in medicine: a retrospective study. Am sci res j eng technol sci. 2016;19(1):42-52. Husband PA, Jacobs PA. Peer mentoring in Higher Education: A review of the current literature and recommendations for implementation of mentoring schemes. Plym Stu Sci. 2009. Andrews J, Clark R. Peer mentoring works! In: Aston University; 2011. Steinberg SE. An Investigation of Peer Mentoring in Medical Schools of North America: The Claremont Graduate University [PhD thesis]. The Claremont Graduate University; 2012. Akinla O, Hagan P, Atiomo W. A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):98. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1195-1 Aziz A, Mahboob U, Sethi AJPJoMS. What problems make students struggle during their undergraduate medical education? A qualitative exploratory study. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(5):1020. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, medicine PGJP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Davies KSJEBL, Practice I. Formulating the evidence based practice question: a review of the frameworks. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2011;6(2):75-80. doi:10.18438/B8WS5N M. Harden JG, Graham Buckley, IR Hart, R %J Medical teacher. BEME Guide No. 1: Best evidence medical education. Med Teach. 1999;21(6):553-62. doi:10.1080/01421599978960 Shirazi M, Mohammadikia A, Jahanian I. A Systematic Review of Studies Regarding Applying Standardized Patients for Teaching Communication Skills to Medical Students Between 2000 - 2013. J Med Educ Dev. 2015;10(2):150-62. Praslova LJEa, evaluation, accountability. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2010;22(3):215-25. doi:10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7 Singh S, Singh N, Dhaliwal U. Near-peer mentoring to complement faculty mentoring of first-year medical students in India. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014;11:12. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.12 Abdolalizadeh P, Pourhassan S, Gandomkar R, Heidari F, Sohrabpour AA. Dual peer mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the perceptions of mentors and mentees. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:2. doi: doi.org/10.18869/mjiri.31.2 Aba Alkhail B. Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical students and their perception of having medical interns as their near peer teacher. Med Teach. 2015;37(S1):S33-S9. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1006602 Yusoff MSB, Rahim AFA, Noor AR, Yaacob N, Hussin Z. Evaluation of medical students' perception towards the BigSib Programme in the School of Medical Sciences, USM. Educ Med J. 2010;2(1):e2-e11. doi:10.5959/eimj.v2i1.71 Altonji SJ, Baños JH, Harada CNJT, medicine li. Perceived benefits of a peer mentoring program for first-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(4):445-52. doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1574579 Huhn D, Eckart W, Karimian-Jazi K, Amr A, Herzog W, Nikendei C. Voluntary peer-led exam preparation course for international first year students: Tutees' perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:106. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0391-5 Page BJ, Loots A, du Toit DF. Perspectives on a South African Tutor/Mentor Program: The Stellenbosch University Experience. Mentor Tutoring. 2005;13(1):5-21. doi:10.1080/13611260500039940 Scott SE, Cook S, Farmer MA, Kim SK, Pomfret RW, Samardzic K, et al. The rising physicians program: a novel approach for mentoring medical students. Mil Med. 2019;184(5-6):e164-e7. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy289 Tanenbaum EJ, Johnson JH, Jordan E, Cottral J, Tenore C, Burton WB, et al. An effective evidence-based student run near-peer support group for the USMLE Step 1 exam. Med Sci Educ. 2016;26(4):691-9. doi:10.1007/s40670-016-0334-8 Budge SJJoCr, learning. Peer mentoring in postsecondary education: Implications for research and practice. J Coll Read Learn 2006;37(1):71-85. doi:10.1080/10790195.2006.10850194 Ardekani A, Hosseini SA, Tabari P, Rahimian Z, Feili A, Amini M, et al. Student support systems for undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic narrative review of the literature. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02791-9 Pethrick H, Nowell L, Paolucci EO, Lorenzetti L, Jacobsen M, Clancy T, et al. Peer mentoring in medical residency education: A systematic review. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(6):e128. doi:10.36834/cmej.68751 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 504 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 387 |
||
