پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,113 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,208 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 40,779,970 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,803,886 |
The Perspective of e-learning in Higher Education: A Systematized Review | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 3، آذر 2021، صفحه 149-161 اصل مقاله (1.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2021.89746.1078 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Shahalizade* 1؛ SeyyedJalal Musavi2 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Head of Cultural-Scientific Research Department, Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, Tehran Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: This study aimed to draw the perspective of e-learning in Iran and the world. In other words, an attempt was made to explore the goals, strategies, obstacles, enablers, and innovations of e-learning in higher education systems of Iran and other countries across the world. Methods: A systematized literature review of domestic and international studies was performed using PRISMA guidelines for data collection. Original studies from Iranian databases (Magiran, IranDoc, Civilica, and Noormags) and international databases (ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor & Francis, and Sage) were included. Three criteria were considered for selecting the sources: relevance to the topic, date of publication (2004-2019 for domestic, and 2005-2020 for international databases), and credibility of sources. Additionally, comparative data analysis was performed using open and axial coding in Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM). Results: Forty one studies from Iranian databases and 22 from international databases were included. The Iranian research review demonstrated that the principal goals of e-learning were quality, cost reduction, and educational justice. Furthermore, it showed that the applied strategies included instructional design, needs assessment, suitable multimedia, and blended learning. Finally, it was revealed that the innovations were MOOCs. As for the international databases, the research review demonstrated that the principal goal of e-learning was innovation in providing instruction and learning at any time and location. The applied strategies included instructional design, evaluation of educational systems, and an interdisciplinary view of e-learning. Other research findings were also discussed. Discussion: Domestic sources were divided into 20 subcategories with respect to the goals, obstacles, enablers, strategies, and innovations. Based on the same factors, international studies fell into 21 subcategories. Decision makers are recommended to consider these elements in their policies regarding e-learning in higher education. Additional discussions and suggestions are provided within the article. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| E-learning؛ Perspective؛ Education؛ Review؛ Grounded theory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Papadimitriou, A. Beyond rhetoric: reinventing the public mission of higher education. Tert Educ Manag 26, 1–4 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11233-019-09046-9
Ellis RA, Ginns P, Piggott L. E‐learning in higher education: some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study. Higher Education Research & Development. 2009 June 1;28(3):303-18. doi:10.1080/07294360902839909
Khan BH, editor. Web-based instruction. Educational Technology; 1997.
Khan BH, editor. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global; 2005. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-634-1
Shafiei Sarvestani M, Mohammadi M, Afshin J, Raeisy L. Students’ experiences of e-learning challenges; a phenomenological study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2019 September 1;10(3):1-0. doi:10.30476/IJVLMS.2019.45841
Islam N, Beer M, Slack F. E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2015;3(5):102-12. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i5.947
Rodrigues H, Almeida F, Figueiredo V, Lopes SL. Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2019 July 1;136:87-98. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007
Aini Q, Budiarto M, Putra PO, Rahardja U. Exploring E-learning Challenges During the Global COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review. Jurnal Sistem Informasi. 2020 Oct 31;16(2):57-65. doi:10.21609/jsi.v16i2.1011
Molchanova E, Kovtoniuk K, Savych O. Covid-19 Presents New Challenges and Opportunities to Higher Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2020 Sep 7;12(2Sup1):168-74. doi:10.18662/rrem/12.2Sup1/303
Adedoyin OB, Soykan E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2020 Sep 3:1-3. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Aboagye E, Yawson JA, Appiah KN. COVID-19 and E-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research. 2020 Jul 22:1-8. doi:10.37256/ser.122020422
Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies. 2020 May 24:1. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Ribeiro R. How university faculty embraced the remote learning shift. EdTech Magazine. 2020.
Shrestha RM, Shrestha S, Acharya A, Gupta A. Online Education Status at Dental Colleges During COVID-19 Pandemic in Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2020 Nov 17;18(2):15-20. doi:10.3126/kumj.v18i2.32939
Fattahi, M., Roshani ali bene see, H., Heydari, S., Shahalizadeh, M., Roshani ali bene see, H., EIC, P. Implementation Pathology of the E-learning Curriculum in Iran (Case Study Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran). Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 2016; 7(2). doi:10.5812/IJVLMS.12157
Van der Spoel I, Noroozi O, Schuurink E, van Ginkel S. Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European journal of teacher education. 2020 August 7;43(4):623-38. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185
Shahalizade, M., Mozaffari, R., Ahmadigol, J., Roshani Ali Bene See, H. The Effect of Peer Feedback and Formative Feedback on the Design and Production of the Instructional Project. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 2019; 10(3): 42-48. doi: 10.30476/ijvlms.2019. doi:10.30476/IJVLMS.2019.45864
Fattahi M, Roshani Ali Bene See H, Heydari S, Shahalizadeh M. Implementation Pathology of the E-learning Curriculum in Iran (Case Study Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran). Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2016 June 1;7(2). doi:10.5812/IJVLMS.12157
Barteit S, Guzek D, Jahn A, Bärnighausen T, Jorge MM, Neuhann F. Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2020 Feb 1;145:103726. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726 PMid:32565611 PMCid:PMC7291921 Choudhury S, Pattnaik S. Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ Perspective. Computers & Education. 2020 January 1;144:103657. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657
Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Sinclair J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020 January 1;102:67-86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Nikolić V, Kaljevic J, Jović S, Petković D, Milovančević M, Dimitrov L, Dachkinov P. Survey of quality models of e-learning systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2018 Dec 1;511:324-30. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.058
Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers & Education. 2020 January 1;144:103698. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
Noroozi O, Pijeira-Díaz HJ, Sobocinski M, Dindar M, Järvelä S, Kirschner PA. Multimodal data indicators for capturing cognitive, motivational, and emotional learning processes: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies. 2020 Nov;25:5499-547. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10229-w
Rodrigues H, Almeida F, Figueiredo V, Lopes SL. Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2019 July 1;136:87-98. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007
Dalim CS, Sunar MS, Dey A, Billinghurst M. Using augmented reality with speech input for non-native children’s language learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2020 Feb 1;134:44-64. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.002
Vanitha V, Krishnan P, Elakkiya R. Collaborative optimization algorithm for learning path construction in E-learning. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2019 July 1;77:325-38. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.06.016
Weller M, Pegler C, Mason R. Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course. The Internet and Higher Education. 2005 Jan 1;8(1):61-71. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.10.001
Herodotou C, Rienties B, Boroowa A, Zdrahal Z, Hlosta M. A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: the teachers’ role and Perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2019 October 1;67(5):1273-306. doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09685-0
George G, Lal AM. Review of ontology-based recommender systems in e-learning. Computers & Education. 2019 December 1;142:103642. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103642
Van Leeuwen A. Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: when and how does information become actionable knowledge?. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2019 October 1;67(5):1043-64. doi:10.1007/s11423-018-09639-y
Nabizadeh AH, Gonçalves D, Gama S, Jorge J, Rafsanjani HN. Adaptive learning path recommender approach using auxiliary learning objects. Computers & Education. 2020 April 1;147:103777. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103777
Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Fromm J, Wohlgenannt I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education. 2020 April 1;147:103778. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMid:19621072 PMCid:PMC2707599 Farasatkhah M. Qualitative research method in social sciences with an emphasis on the grounded theory. Agah publication. 2016 Nov 1, 96-97.
Hart JE. Importance of instructional designers in online higher education. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design. 2020;9(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/92jeh
Sharpe R, Oliver M. Designing courses for e-learning. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning. 2007 Apr 19:41-51.
Hussin H, Bunyarit F, Hussein R. Instructional design and e‐learning: Examining learners’ Perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 2009 January 2. doi:10.1108/10650740910921537
Zheng L, Smaldino S. Key instructional design elements for distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2003;4(2):153-66.
Van Merriënboer J, Bastiaens T, Hoogveld A. Instructional design for integrated e-learning. Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology, and organization. 2004 Mar 1:13-23.
Flynn JT. MOOCS: Disruptive innovation and the future of higher education. Christian Education Journal. 2013 May;10(1):149-62. doi:10.1177/073989131301000112.
Shahalizade, M. An Introduction to Adobe Flash Professional CS5 to Produce Multimedia Animation and Electronic Content. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 2013; 4(2): 75-82. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 743 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 604 |
||