پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,519 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,424,741 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,296,703 |
A Study of E-Learning Maturity in Higher Agricultural Education Using Artificial Neural Network | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 2، شهریور 2021، صفحه 117-128 اصل مقاله (980.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2021.89436.1073 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Khalil Mirzayi* ؛ Marjan Sepahpanah | ||
| Department of Entrepreneurship Development and Sustainable Rural Employment Studies. Jahad University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Being a relatively new learning mode, e-learning offers a comprehensive solution for those institutions seeking to adopt modern technologies and transform their teaching methods and environments. The present study employed Misra and Dhingra model to assess e-learning maturity in the field of agriculture in Iran using artificial neural network. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed based on six levels of Misra and Dhingra model. It was conducted among 340 graduate agriculture students and 177 faculty members at four universities including Bu Ali Sina, Tehran, Hormozgan, and Mashahd universities. The participants were selected based on proportional sampling method from July 1 to September 28, 2019. A validated researcher-made questionnaire was used for data collection, and WEKA software version 3.9.2 was employed for data analysis. Results: The results indicated that the level of academic achievement in the field of agriculture can be predicted based on the Misra and Dhingra model. Furthermore, e-learning was at the fourth level in this field in Iran’s higher education. Conclusions: In general, educational facilities and infrastructures were identified to be suitable for e-learning implementation in Iran’s higher education institutions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| E-learning؛ Electronic maturation؛ Weka software؛ ANN | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Lynch J. m-Government in Ireland 2008. Reach a Next Utility Limited Company publication. 2008.
Diver P, Martinez I. MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: Opportunities and challenges. Distance Education. 2015 Jan 2; 36(1):5-25. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019968
Daniel J. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education. 2012 Dec 13; 2012(3). doi:10.5334/2012-18.
Bates AT, Sangra A. Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Apr 8. ISBN: 978-0-470-58472-9.
Brown R. The new English quality assurance regime. Quality in Higher Education. 2011 Jul 1; 17(2):213-29. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.597107
Nolan R, Koot W, William JD. Nolan Stages Theory Today: A framework for senior and IT management to manage information technology. Holland Management Review. 1992; 31(1):1-24.
Misra D, Dhingra CA. E-Government Maturity Model, National Information Center, Department of Information Technology. New Dehli, Electronic information planning Journal. 2002.
Newsom C. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Oxford University Press, USA; 2003. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390032.001.0001
Aladejebi O. The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intention among Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development. 2018; 5(2):1-4. doi:10.15640/jsbed.v6n2a1.
Teicher J, Hughes O, Dow N. E-government: a new route to public sector quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 2002 Dec 1. doi:10.1108/09604520210451867
Andersen KV, Henriksen HZ. E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government information quarterly. 2006 Jan 1; 23(2):236-48. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
Allen IE, Seaman J. Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Sloan Consortium (NJ1). 2010 Nov.
Watkins KE, Dirani KM. A meta-analysis of the dimensions of a learning organization questionnaire: Looking across cultures, ranks, and industries. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2013 May; 15(2):148-62. doi:10.1177/1523422313475991
Allen IE, Seaman J. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950; 2013 Jan.doi:10.12691/education-1-10-1
McCarthy SA. Online Learning as a Strategic Asset. Volume I: A Resource for Campus Leaders. A Report on the Online Education Benchmarking Study Conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. 2009 Aug.
Taylor JC. Fifth generation distance education. Instructional Science and Technology. 2001; 4(1):1-4. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511495618.002.
Carr NG. IT doesn't matter. Educause Review. 2003 May 1; 38:24-38. doi:10.4236/psych.2011.29135 5,216
Hagel J, Brown JS, Davison L. Shaping strategy in a world of constant disruption. Harvard Business Review. 2008 Oct 1; 86(10):80-9.
Koch JV. TQM: Why is its impact in higher education so small?. The TQM magazine. 2003 Oct 1.doi:10.1108/09544780310487721.
Quinn A, Lemay G, Larsen P, Johnson DM. Service quality in higher education. Total Quality Management. 2009 Feb 1; 20(2):139-52. doi:10.1080/14783360802622805
Chalmers D. A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 2007 Oct; 1(2):1-22.
Gibbs G. Dimensions of quality. York: Higher Education Academy; 2010 Sep. doi:10.1108/09513549310040277
Hénard F. Learning our lesson: Review of quality teaching in higher education draft report. 2009. doi:10.1787/9789264079281-en
Law DC. Quality assurance in post‐secondary education. Quality Assurance in Education. 2010 Feb 2. doi:10.1108/09684881011079125
Coates H, Seifert T. Linking assessment for learning, improvement and accountability. Quality in Higher Education. 2011 Jul 1; 17(2):179-94. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.554308
Zaka P, Higgins A, Anderson B, Suddaby G. Validating a collective scenario of tertiary education in 2016 with SITE. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 Mar 5 (pp. 3170-3176). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Marshall S. Using the e-learning maturity model to identify good practice in e-learning. InASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2013 (pp. 546-556). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
Meier C, Seufert S, Euler D. Quality assessment and development in the course of the EFMD CEL program accreditation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2012 Feb; 28(1):52-64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00442.x
Marshall SJ. Evaluating the strategic and leadership challenges of MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching. 2013 Jun 1; 9(2):216-27.doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
Zhou Y. Towards capability maturity model of e-Learning process, 2012. doi:10.4236/iim.2012.44015. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 393 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 380 |
||