LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,363
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,292,321
NAYAK B, SHIVANANDA, SRIDEVI, VINEETH, SAHU, PRADEEPKUMAR, SUBBARAMAIAH, NAGENDRA, TELANG, LATHA, GOUDAPPALA, PRASHANTHKUMAR, HALAPPA KARIAPPA, CHANDRAKANTH, SHARMA, AKANKSHA, SAGARI K, MAANASA, NAYAK, AKASH S. (1399). Students’ engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(1), 18-25. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86925.1280
SHIVANANDA NAYAK B; VINEETH SRIDEVI; PRADEEPKUMAR SAHU; NAGENDRA SUBBARAMAIAH; LATHA TELANG; PRASHANTHKUMAR GOUDAPPALA; CHANDRAKANTH HALAPPA KARIAPPA; AKANKSHA SHARMA; MAANASA SAGARI K; AKASH S NAYAK. "Students’ engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9, 1, 1399, 18-25. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86925.1280
NAYAK B, SHIVANANDA, SRIDEVI, VINEETH, SAHU, PRADEEPKUMAR, SUBBARAMAIAH, NAGENDRA, TELANG, LATHA, GOUDAPPALA, PRASHANTHKUMAR, HALAPPA KARIAPPA, CHANDRAKANTH, SHARMA, AKANKSHA, SAGARI K, MAANASA, NAYAK, AKASH S. (1399). 'Students’ engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 9(1), pp. 18-25. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86925.1280
NAYAK B, SHIVANANDA, SRIDEVI, VINEETH, SAHU, PRADEEPKUMAR, SUBBARAMAIAH, NAGENDRA, TELANG, LATHA, GOUDAPPALA, PRASHANTHKUMAR, HALAPPA KARIAPPA, CHANDRAKANTH, SHARMA, AKANKSHA, SAGARI K, MAANASA, NAYAK, AKASH S. Students’ engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 9(1): 18-25. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86925.1280

Students’ engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students

Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
دوره 9، شماره 1، فروردین 2021، صفحه 18-25    اصل مقاله (521.38 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2020.86925.1280
نویسندگان
SHIVANANDA NAYAK B* 1؛ VINEETH SRIDEVI2؛ PRADEEPKUMAR SAHU3؛ NAGENDRA SUBBARAMAIAH2؛ LATHA TELANG2؛ PRASHANTHKUMAR GOUDAPPALA2؛ CHANDRAKANTH HALAPPA KARIAPPA2؛ AKANKSHA SHARMA2؛ MAANASA SAGARI K2؛ AKASH S NAYAK4
11Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Purle, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India; 2Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
2Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Purle, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
3Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
4Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of higher education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
چکیده
Introduction: Small group teaching is an educational strategy that may be used to facilitate learning. Tutorials enable an adult approach toward learning where students take responsibility for their own learning. We aimed to investigate the students’engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among undergraduate medical students.
Methods: A cross‑sectional, descriptive survey was conducted at the Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, where we collected the data from 300 undergraduate students using convenience
sampling method. A self‑administered questionnaire consisting of 22 items which was piloted on 20 students, and six experienced medical educators were consulted for face validation. The internal
consistency of the questionnaire measured by Cronbach’s alpha reliability test was 0.80. It was used to measure the students’perception on the effectiveness of tutorials with regard to learning
experience, teamwork, confidence, communication skills, and role of the teacher. Statistical analyses included mean and standard deviation for the description of each item, t‑test to compare the mean scores for gender and class year, and one‑way analysis of variance between groups for age group comparisons using SPSS version 24 software.
Results: Students’ overall perceptions of small group teaching effectiveness showed that tutorials were beneficial to their learning process (mean: 3.61±0.50). The majority of the students have
positive perceptions toward small group effectiveness, particularly in learning experience (mean: 3.72±0.68) and teamwork (mean: 3.36±0.59). A significant difference was found between year 1 and year 2 students with regards to learning experience (p <0.001), teamwork (p <0.05), communication skills (p <0.05), and the role of the tutor (p <0.001). Additionally, the mean scores, measuring overall effectiveness of tutorials, for the 2nd year students were significantly higher than that for the 1st year students (3.70±0.41and 3.50±0.57, (p <0.001).
Conclusions: The data of this study show that tutorial is an effective small group teaching method for medical students compared to large group teaching.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Faculty؛ Perception؛ Tutorial؛ Teaching
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
1. Yvonne Steinert. Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ. 2004; 38: 286–93.
2. Mir MM, Jeelani M, Alshahrani MS. A practical approach for successful small group teaching in medical schools with student centered curricula. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019;7(3):149-53.
3. Zhenhui R. Matching Teaching Styles with Learning Styles in East Asian Contexts. The Internet TESL
Journal. 2001;7(7): 1-4.
4. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Aghajani M. Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer? Webmed Central Medical Education. 2011;2(3):1-3.
5. de Jong Z, van Nies JA, Peters SW, Vink S, Dekker FW, Scherpbier A. Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2010; 10:79.
6. Rehman R, Khan AN, Kamran A. Role of small group interactive sessions in two different curriculums based medical colleges. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62:920-3.
7. Dolmans DH, Schmidt HG. What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group
tutorials in problem-based learning? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(4):321-36.
8. Visschers-Pleijers AJ, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning. Med Teach. 2004; 26(5):471-8.
9. Dolmans DH, De GW, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Problem-based learning: future challenges for
educational practice and research. Med Educ. 2005; 39(7):732-41.
10. De Grave WS, Dolmans DH, Van Der Vleuten CP. Student Perspectives on Critical Incidents in
the Tutorial Group. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2002;7:201–9.
11. Sahu PK, Nayak S, Rodrigues V. Medical students’ perceptions of small group teaching effectiveness in hybrid curriculum. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:30.

12. Robillard DT, Spring LM, Pasquale SJ, Savageau JA. Identifying Characteristics of Effective Small Group Learning Valued by Medical Students and Facilitators. University of Massachusetts Medical School: Senior Scholars Program; 2011.
13. Euliano TY. Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol
Educ. 2001;25(1-4):36–43.
14. Guraya SY, Almaramhy HH. Small group teaching improves students’ acquisition of knowledge and
skills. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(12):1304–9.
15. Saleh AM, Shabila NP, Dabbagh AA, Al-Tawil NG, Al-Hadithi TS. A qualitative assessment of faculty
perspectives of small group teaching experience in Iraq. BMC Med Educ. 2015; 15:19.
16. Das M, Mpofu DJ, Hasan MY, Stewart TS. Student perceptions of tutor skills in problem-based learning
tutorials. Med Educ. 2002;36(3):272–8.
17. Chattu VK, Sahu PK, Seedial N, Seecharan G, Seepersad A, Seunarine M, et al. An exploratory study
of quality of life and its relationship with academic performance among students in Medical and other
health professions. Med Sci (Basel). 2020;8(2):23.
18. Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES
model. Med Educ. 1984; 18:284-97.
19. Edmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide No. 48. Med Teach. 2010;32:715-26.
20. Walton H. Small group methods in medical teaching. Med Educ. 1997;31(6): 459-64.
21. Saleh AM, Shabila NP, Dabbagh AA, Al-Tawil NG, Al-Hadithi TS. A qualitative assessment of faculty
perspectives of small group teaching experience in Iraq. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:19.
22. Rahman SM, Sarkar MA, Gomes JJ, Mojumder FA. Student’ perceptions of learning science in small
groups: A case study in higher education. Brunei Int J Sci Math Educ. 2010; 2(1): 32-47.
23. Chung E, Hitchcock MA, Oh S, Han E, Woo Y. The relationship between student perceptions of tutor
performance and tutors’ background in problem‑based learning in South Korea. Int J MedEduc. 2011;2: 7-11.
24. Salminen H, Öhman E, Stenfors-Hayes T. Medical students’ feedback regarding their clinical learning
environment in primary healthcare: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2016;16(1):313.
25. Tripathi RK, Sarkate PV, Jalgaonkar SV, Rege NN. Development of active learning modules in
pharmacology for small group teaching. Educ Health. 2015;28(1):46-51.
26. Wun YT, Tse EY, Lam TP, Lam CL. PBL curriculum improves medical students’ participation in small
group tutorials. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):198-203. 
27. Ananthkrishnan N. Microteachig as a vehicle of teacher training: an appraisal, In’. Ananthkrishnan N,
Sethuraman KR, kunar S. Medical education principles and practice. 2nd ed. Pondichery: Jipmer. 2013; 93-7.
28. Garg A, Rataboli PV, Mulchand K. Students opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2004;36(3):155-8.
29. Advani UP, Bhojani KG, Gadavi VM. students view on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Solapur Medical Journal. 2006;2:1-8.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,055
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,568


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب