LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,563
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,383
Keyvani Hafshejani, A, Aminian, Gh, Azimian, M, Bahramizadeh, M, Safaeepour, Z, Biglarian, A, Keivani, M. (1399). Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a New Ankle Foot Orthosis on Kinetics and Kinematics parameters for Multiple Sclerosis Patients. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(6), 783-792. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2007-1136
A Keyvani Hafshejani; Gh Aminian; M Azimian; M Bahramizadeh; Z Safaeepour; A Biglarian; M Keivani. "Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a New Ankle Foot Orthosis on Kinetics and Kinematics parameters for Multiple Sclerosis Patients". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10, 6, 1399, 783-792. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2007-1136
Keyvani Hafshejani, A, Aminian, Gh, Azimian, M, Bahramizadeh, M, Safaeepour, Z, Biglarian, A, Keivani, M. (1399). 'Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a New Ankle Foot Orthosis on Kinetics and Kinematics parameters for Multiple Sclerosis Patients', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(6), pp. 783-792. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2007-1136
Keyvani Hafshejani, A, Aminian, Gh, Azimian, M, Bahramizadeh, M, Safaeepour, Z, Biglarian, A, Keivani, M. Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a New Ankle Foot Orthosis on Kinetics and Kinematics parameters for Multiple Sclerosis Patients. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 10(6): 783-792. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2007-1136

Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a New Ankle Foot Orthosis on Kinetics and Kinematics parameters for Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 58، دوره 10، شماره 6، اسفند 2020، صفحه 783-792    اصل مقاله (895.47 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2007-1136
نویسندگان
A Keyvani Hafshejani1؛ Gh Aminian* 2؛ M Azimian3؛ M Bahramizadeh2؛ Z Safaeepour2؛ A Biglarian4؛ M Keivani5
1PhD Candidate, Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2PhD, Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3MD, MS Clinic, Rofeideh Hospital, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Social Determinants of Health Research Sciences, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5MD, Department of Radiology, Shahrekord Univer­sity of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
چکیده
Background: The damage of the central nervous system due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) leads to many walking disorders in this population. However, current ankle-foot orthoses prescribed for improving walking disorders for these patients are not clinically cost-efficient.
Objective: This study aimed to design and fabricate a dynamic ankle foot orthosis and a new spring-damper joint mechanism that could adapt the walking problems of MS patients and evaluate the immediate effect of the new orthosis on the speed, range of motion, moment, total work and ground reaction force during walking.
Material and Methods: In this case-series study, after the design and fabrication of a new orthosis, the kinetics and kinematics of walking of four patients with MS were assessed in a case series study.
Results: Walking speed improved with the new orthosis in two participants. The sagittal range of motion (ROM) increased for most of the participants. The sagittal moments increased for hip, knee and ankle joints in most of the measurements. The total joint work showed noticeable difference in the ankle joint. The increased values of vertical component of the ground reaction force (VGRF) were negligible and the increase in the impulse of VGRF was noticeable for only one participant.
Conclusion: The new orthosis had positive effects kinetic and kinematic parameters of walking such as the increased velocity by two subjects and also a more normal sagittal ROM, moment and work, suggesting the potential usefulness of the new orthotic device for MS population.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Multiple Sclerosis؛ Kinetics؛ Kinematics؛ Ankle-Foot Orthosis؛ Gait
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Berto P, Amato M, Bellantonio P, Bortolon F, Cavalla P, Florio C, et al. The direct cost of patients with multiple sclerosis: a survey from Italian MS centres. Neurol Sci. 2011;32(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0578-4. PubMed PMID: 21505911.
  2. Amato MP, Battaglia MA, Caputo D, Fattore G, Gerzeli S, Pitaro M, et al. The costs of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional, multicenter cost-of-illness study in Italy. J Neurol. 2002;249(2):152-63. doi: 10.1007/pl00007858. PubMed PMID: 11985380.
  3. Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Nichols E, Bhutta ZA, Gebrehiwot TT, Hay SI, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3):269-85. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30443-5. PubMed PMID: 30679040. PubMed PMCID: PMC6372756.
  4. Gehlsen G, Whaley M. Falls in the elderly: part II, Balance, strength, and flexibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:739-41. PubMed PMID: 2403279.
  5. Jamali A, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Fereshtenajad N, Hillier S. Somatosensory impairment and its association with balance limitation in people with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture. 2017;57:224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.020. PubMed PMID: 28667904.
  6. Kelleher KJ, Spence W, Solomonidis S, Apatsidis D. The characterisation of gait patterns of people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(15):1242-50. doi: 10.3109/09638280903464497. PubMed PMID: 20156050.
  7. Klewer J, Pohlau D, Nippert I, Haas J, Kugler J. Problems reported by elderly patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2001;33(3):167-71. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200106000-00009. PubMed PMID: 11413662.
  8. Kohn CG, Baker WL, Sidovar MF, Coleman CI. Walking Speed and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. Patient. 2014;7:55-61. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0028-x. PubMed PMID: 24078332.
  9. Einarsson U, Gottberg K, Fredrikson S, Koch LV, Holmqvist LW. Activities of daily living and social activities in people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(6):543-51. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr953oa. PubMed PMID: 16892936.
  10. Corry M, While A. The needs of carers of people with multiple sclerosis: A literature review. Scand Caring Sci. 2009;23(3):569-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00645.x. PubMed PMID: 19077062.
  11. Dunn J. Impact of mobility impairment on the burden of caregiving in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2010;10(4):433-40. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.34. PubMed PMID: 20482233.
  12. LaRocca NG. Impact of Walking Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis, Perspectives of Patients and Care Partners. Patient. 2011;4(3):189-201. doi: 10.2165/11591150-000000000-00000. PubMed PMID: 21766914.
  13. Renfrew L, Paul L, McFadyen A, Rafferty D, Moseley O, Lord AC, et al. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(7):1150-62. doi: 10.1177/0269215519842254. PubMed PMID: 30974955.
  14. Chui K, Jorge M, Yen S-C, Lusardi M. Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation. Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019. p. 227-32.
  15. Swinnen E, Lefeber N, Werbrouck A, Gesthuizen Y, Ceulemans L, Christiaens S, et al. Male and female opinions about orthotic devices of the lower limb: A multicentre, observational study in patients with central neurological movement disorders. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42(1):121-30. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172214. PubMed PMID: 29400677.
  16. Renfrew L, Lord AC, McFadyen AK, Rafferty D, Hunter R, Bowers R, et al. A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018;5:1-9. doi: 10.1177/2055668318755071.
  17. Cattaneo D, Marazzini F, Crippa A, Cardini R. Do static or dynamic AFOs improve balance? Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(8):894-9. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr547oa. PubMed PMID: 12501952.
  18. Hsu JD, Michael J, Fisk J. AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
  19. Bregman DJ, De Groot V, Van Diggele P, Meulman H, Houdijk H, Harlaar J. Polypropylene ankle foot orthoses to overcome drop-foot gait in central neurological patients: a mechanical and functional evaluation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(3):293-304. doi: 10.3109/03093646.2010.495969. PubMed PMID: 20738233.
  20. Sheffler LR, Bailey SN, Chae J. Spatiotemporal and kinematic effect of peroneal nerve stimulation versus an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case series. PM&R. 2009;1(7):604-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.04.002. PubMed PMID: 19627953.
  21. Khurana SR, Beranger AG, Felix ER. Perceived Exertion Is Lower When Using a Functional Electrical Stimulation Neuroprosthesis Compared With an Ankle-Foot Orthosis in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(3):133-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000626. PubMed PMID: 27680426.
  22. Bulley C, Mercer TH, Hooper JE, Cowan P, Scott S, Van Der Linden ML. Experiences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot-drop in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(6):458-67. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.913713. PubMed PMID: 24796365.
  23. Yamamoto S, Ibayashi S, Fuchi M, Yasui T. Immediate-term effects of use of an ankle–foot orthosis with an oil damper on the gait of stroke patients when walking without the device. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(2):140-9. doi: 10.1177/0309364613518340. PubMed PMID: 24469429.
  24. Alam M, Choudhury IA, Mamat AB. Mechanism and design analysis of articulated ankle foot orthoses for drop-foot. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:867869. doi: 10.1155/2014/867869. PubMed PMID: 24892102. PubMed PMCID: PMC4032669.
  25. Kaipust JP, Huisinga JM, Filipi M, Stergiou N. Gait variability measures reveal differences between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Motor Control. 2012;16(2):229-44. doi: 10.1123/mcj.16.2.229. PubMed PMID: 22615327.
  26. Windolf M, Gotzen N, Morlock M. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems—exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. J Biomech. 2008;41:2776-80. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.024.
  27. Rogind H, Simonsen H, Era P, Bliddal H. Comparison of Kistler 9861A force platform and Chattecx Balance System for measurement of postural sway: correlation and test-retest reliability. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(2):106-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.01139.x. PubMed PMID: 12641642.
  28. Benedetti M, Piperno R, Simoncini L, Bonato P, Tonini A, Giannini S. Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 1999;5(5):363-8. doi: 10.1177/135245859900500510. PubMed PMID: 10516781.
  29. Neptune RR, Sasaki K. Ankle plantar flexor force production is an important determinant of the preferred walk-to-run transition speed. J Exp Biol. 2005;208(5):799-808. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01435. PubMed PMID: 15755878.
  30. Bregman D, Harlaar J, Meskers C, De Groot V. Spring-like Ankle Foot Orthoses reduce the energy cost of walking by taking over ankle work. Gait Posture. 2012;35(1):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.026. PubMed PMID: 22050974.
  31. Petrucci MN. Evaluation of gait kinematics and kinetics using a powered ankle-foot orthosis for gait assistance in people with multiple sclerosis. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; 2016.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,545
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 660


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب