LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,551
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,353
Zahroh, F, Anam, C, Sutanto, H, Irdawati, Y, Arifin, Z, Kartikasari, Y. (1399). Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(6), 699-706. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007
F Zahroh; C Anam; H Sutanto; Y Irdawati; Z Arifin; Y Kartikasari. "Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10, 6, 1399, 699-706. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007
Zahroh, F, Anam, C, Sutanto, H, Irdawati, Y, Arifin, Z, Kartikasari, Y. (1399). 'Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(6), pp. 699-706. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007
Zahroh, F, Anam, C, Sutanto, H, Irdawati, Y, Arifin, Z, Kartikasari, Y. Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1399; 10(6): 699-706. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007

Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 49، دوره 10، شماره 6، اسفند 2020، صفحه 699-706    اصل مقاله (1.04 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007
نویسندگان
F Zahroh1، 2؛ C Anam3؛ H Sutanto* 3، 4؛ Y Irdawati1، 2؛ Z Arifin1؛ Y Kartikasari5
1MSc, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
2MSc, Smart Material Research Center (SMARC), Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
3PhD, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
4PhD, Smart Material Research Center (SMARC), Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
5MSc, Health Polytechnic of Semarang, Ministry of Health, Indonesia
چکیده
Background: Some organs in the body are sensitive to radiation such as eyes, breast, and gonads. Protection of sensitive organs against radiation is necessary. Recently, many sensitive organ shields have been developed from different materials.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose reduction and image quality from implementation of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) as an alternative gonad shield in digital radiography (DR).
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, the SR-Pb gonad shields with various thicknesses of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm were synthesized. This study used the Pb percentage of 5 wt%. An anthropomorphic phantom was used in abdomen plain examinations. The results obtained from the use of the SR-Pb was compared with standard gonad shield, i.e. lead apron. To measure the dose reduction, the Piranha detector was used. The image quality assessment was evaluated with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
Results: This study showed the dose reduction was significant for all SR-Pb thicknesses, and incrementally increased with the increase of the SR-Pb thickness. The minimum and maximum of dose reduction were 22.8% for 2 mm and 66.9% for 10 mm SR-Pb, respectively.
Conclusion: Compared to the reference image without gonad shield, the SNR and CNR do not significantly change. Hence, the SR-Pb is probably to be used as an alternative gonad shield.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Lead؛ Gonads؛ Imaging؛ Radiation Protection
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Indonesian Ministry of Healthy. Indonesia Basic Health Research (RISKESDAS). Publication of Indonesian Ministry of Health; 2018. Available from: http://labdata.litbang.depkes.go.id/menu-download.
  2. GBD Mortality and Caused of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. PubMed PMID: 25530442. PubMed PMCID: PMC4340604.
  3. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PubMed PMID: 18082557.
  4. Marsh RM, Silosky M. Patient Shielding in Diagnostic Imaging: Discontinuing a Legacy Practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):755-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20508. PubMed PMID: 30673332.
  5. Dauer LT, Casciotta KA, Erdi YE, Rothenberg LN. Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans. BMC Med Imaging. 2007;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-7-5. PubMed PMID: 17367529. PubMed PMCID: PMC1831769.
  6. Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Gholami M. Gonad Shielding for Patients Undergoing Conventional Radiological Examinations: Is There Cause for Concern? Jentashapir J Health Res. 2016;7(2): 31170. doi: 10.17795/jjhr-31170.
  7. MacKay M, Hancy C, Crowe A, D’Rozario R, Ng CKC. Attitudes of medical imaging technologists on use of gonad shielding in general radiography. Radiographer. 2012;59(2):35-39. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-3909.2012.tb00172.x.
  8. Bardo DME, Black M, Schenk K, Zaritzky MF. Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(3):253-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1094-4. PubMed PMID: 19130048.
  9. Fawcett S, Gomez A, Barter S, Ditchfield M, Set P. More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e442-7. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25742247. PubMed PMID: 22096220. PubMed PMCID: PMC3587098.
  10. Frantzen MJ, Robben S, Postma AA, Zoetelief J, Wildberger JE, Kemerink GJ. Gonad shielding in pediatrics pelvic radiography: Disadvantages prevail over benefit. Insights into Imaging. 2012;3(1):23-32. doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0130-3. PubMed PMID: 22695996. PubMed PMCID: PMC3292647.
  11. Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Shams N, Gholami M. Radioprotection to the Gonads in Pediatric Pelvic Radiography: Effectiveness of Developed Bismuth Shield. Int J Pediatr. 2017;5(42):5153-66. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2017.23.116.1939.
  12. Aral N, Nergis FB, Candan C. The X-ray attenuation and the flexural properties of lead-free coated fabrics. J Ind Text. 2016;47(2):252-68. doi: 10.1177/1528083716644287.
  13. Wozniak AI, Ivanov VS, Zhdanovich OA, Nazarov VI, Yegorov AS. Modern approaches to polymer materials protecting from ionizing radiation. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2017;33(5):2148-63. doi: 10.13005/ojc/330502.
  14. Irdawati Y, Sutanto H, Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Zahroh F, Dougherty G. Development of a novel artifact-free eye shield based on silicon rubber-lead composition in the CT examination of the head. J Radiol Prot. 2019;39(4):991-1005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab2f3e. PubMed PMID: 31272094.
  15. Sutanto H, Irdawati Y, Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Dougherty G, Hidayanto E, Arifin Z, Soedarsono JW, Bahrudin. An artifact-free thyroid shield in CT examination: a phantom study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020;6(1):15-29. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab6ed1.
  16. Tiwari A, HiharaLH, Rawlins JW. Intelligent Coatings for Corrosion Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. p. 585-602.
  17. Davey E, England A. AP versus PA positioning in lumbar spine computed radiography: Image quality and individual organ doses. Radiography. 2015;21(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2014.11.003.
  18. McCaffrey JP, Shen H, Downton B, Mainegra-Hing E. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garment. Med Phys. 2007;34(2):530-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2426404. PubMed PMID: 17388170.
  19. Tsai YS, Liu YS, Chuang MT, Wang CK, Lai CS, Tsai HM, Lin CJ, Lu CH. Shielding during x-ray examination of pediatric female patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Radiol Prot. 2014;34(4):801-10. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/4/801. PubMed PMID: 25325378.
  20. Jang JS, Yang HJ, Koo HJ, Kim SH, Park CR, Yoon SH, Shin SY, Do KH. Image quality assessment with dose reduction using high kVp and additional filtration for abdominal digital radiography. Physica Medica. 2018;50:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.007. PubMed PMID: 29891093.
  21. Hess R, Neitzel U. Optimizing Image Quality and Dose for Digital Radiography of Distal Pediatric Extremities Using the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2012;184(7):643-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312727. PubMed PMID: 22618480.
  22. Mraity HAAB, England A, Cassidy S, Eachus P, Dominguez A, Hogg P. Development and validation of a visual grading scale for assessing image quality of AP pelvis radiographic images. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):1-27. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150430. PubMed PMID: 26943836. PubMed PMCID: PMC4985444.
  23. Kaplan SL, Magill D, Felice MA, Xiao R, Ali S, Zhu X. Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:227-34. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3996-5.
  24. AAPM. Protocol for the radiation safety surveys of diagnostic radiological equipment. New York: Inc. Report no 25; 1988.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,693
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 651


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب