Construct Validity of Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools Climate Survey in Iran: A Validation Study

1. Konold T, Cornell D, Huang F, Meyer P, Lacey A, Nekvasil E, et al. Multilevel multi-informant structure of the Authoritative School Climate Survey. Sch Psychol Q. 2014;29(3):238-55. doi: 10.1037/spq0000062. [PubMed: 24884448].## 2. Thapa A, Cohen J, Guffey S, Higgins-D’Alessandro A. A review of school climate research. Rev Educ Res. 2013;83(3):357-85. doi: 10.3102/0034654313483907. ## 3. Benbenishty R, Astor RA, Roziner I, Wrabel SL. Testing the causal links between school climate, school violence, and school academic performance: A cross-lagged panel autoregressive model. Educ Res. 2016;45(3):197-206. doi:10.3102/0013189X16644603. ## 4. Rezapour M, Khanjani N, Mirzai M. Exploring associations between school environment and bullying in Iran: Multilevel contextual effects modeling. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;99:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.036. ## 5. Rezapour M, Khanjani N, Soori H. The Types of Bullying Behaviors and Its Association with General Life Satisfaction and Self-Rated Health among Iranian Pupils. J Res Health Sci. 2019;19(1):e00436. doi: 10.15171/jrhs.2019.03. [PubMed: 31133626]. ## 6. Waasdorp TE, Pas ET, O’Brennan LM, Bradshaw CP. A Multilevel Perspective on the Climate of Bullying: Discrepancies Among Students, School Staff, and Parents. J Sch Violence. 2011;10(2):115-32. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2010.539164. [PubMed: 21552337]. [PubMed Central: PMC3088118]. ## 7. Ramsey CM, Spira AP, Parisi JM, Rebok GW. School climate: perceptual differences between students, parents, and school staff. Sch Eff Sch Improv. 2016;27(4):629-41. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2016.1199436. [PubMed: 28642631]. [PubMed Central: PMC5473611]. ## 8. Cohen J, McCabe L, Michelli NM, Pickeral T. School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teach Coll Rec. 2009;111(1):180-213. ## 9. Kohl D, Recchia S, Steffgen G. Measuring school climate: an overview of measurement scales. Educ Res. 2013;55(4):411-26. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2013.844944. ## 10. Voight A, Nation M. Practices for Improving Secondary School Climate: A Systematic Review of the Research Literature. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58(1-2):174-91. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12074. [PubMed: 27535489]. ## 11. Rezapour M, Khanjani N, Mirzai M, Mohebbi M. Comparison of Self-Report, Peer-Report, and Principal-Report in Bullying Victimization and Perpetration Among Iranian Students. Int J School Health. 2019;6(2):e89882. doi: 10.5812/intjsh.89882. ## 12. School climate survey compendia: The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (NCSSLE) [Internet]; 2017. Available from: https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/topic-research/school-climate-measurement/school-climate-survey-compendium. ## 13. Bachman R, Randolph A, Brown BL. Predicting Perceptions of Fear at School and Going to and From School for African American and White Students: The Effects of School Security Measures. Youth Soc. 2011;43(2):705-26. doi: 10.1177/0044118x10366674. ## 14. Bradshaw CP, Waasdorp TE, Debnam KJ, Johnson SL. Measuring school climate in high schools: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. J Sch Health. 2014;84(9):593-604. doi: 10.1111/josh.12186. [PubMed: 25117894]. ## 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School Connectedness: Strategies for Increasing Protective Factors Among Youth. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. ## 16. Johnson B, Stevens JJ, Zvoch K. Teachers’ Perceptions of School Climate:A Validity Study of Scores From the Revised School Level Environment Questionnaire. Educ Psychol Meas. 2007;67(5):833-44. doi: 10.1177/0013164406299102. ## 17. Marsh HW, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Kaur G. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. [PubMed: 24313568]. ## 18. Morin AJS, Marsh HW, Nagengast B. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. In: Gregory R. Hancock, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling : a second course. 2nd ed; 2013. p. 395-437. ## 19. Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, Morin AJ, Trautwein U, et al. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychol Assess. 2010;22(3):471-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227. [PubMed: 20822261]. ## 20. Tsigilis N, Gregoriadis A, Grammatikopoulos V, Zachopoulou E. Applying Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale in a Representative Greek Sample. Front Psychol. 2018;9:733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00733. [PubMed: 29867688]. [PubMed Central: PMC5967347]. ## 21. Pan J, Zaff JF. The Measurement Structure of School Engagement Among Youth in China: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2019;37(3):280-92. doi: 10.1177/0734282917733652. ## 22. Marsh HW, Guo J, Dicke T, Parker PD, Craven RG. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2020;55(1):102-19. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503. ## 23. Rezapour M, Khanjani N, Mirzai M. Testing measurement invariance and multilevel factor structures of bullying among Iranian adolescents. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. 2019;1-17. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2019.1605952 . ## 24. Brislin RW. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185-216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301. ## 25. Rutherford-Hemming T. Determining Content Validity and Reporting a Content Validity Index for Simulation Scenarios. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015;36(6):389-93. doi: 10.5480/15-1640. [PubMed: 26753299]. ## 26. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55. ## 27. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles: CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2015. ## 28. Stapleton LM. Multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Structural equation modeling: A second course: Iap; 2013. p. 521-62. ## 29. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9(2):233-55. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5. ## 30. Byrne BM, Van de Vijver FJR. Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing. 2010;10(2):107-32. doi: 10.1080/15305051003637306. ## 31. Meade AW, Johnson EC, Braddy PW. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(3):568-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568. [PubMed: 18457487]. ## 32. Muñoz PE, Casas JA, Del Rey R, Ortega-Ruiz R, Cerda G, Pérez C. Validation and cross-cultural robustness of the School-wide Climate Scale (SCS) across Spanish and Chilean students. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2018;56:182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.01.002. ## 33. Wang M-T, Degol JL. School Climate: a Review of the Construct, Measurement, and Impact on Student Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review. 2016;28(2):315-52. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1. ##