پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,120 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,834 |
The Mediating Role of Blended Learning Infrastructures in the Relationship Between Good Governance, Social Capital and General Attitude Toward Business Environment | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 10، شماره 4، اسفند 2019، صفحه 65-74 اصل مقاله (866.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2019.84320.1005 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Khalil Safari1؛ Ali Mohammad Ahmadi Gharacheh* 2؛ Habibollah Danai3 | ||
| 1Management, Economics, and Accounting, Business Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Payame Noor University, pobox 19395 -3697 Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Management, Economics, and Accounting Department, Business management Faculty, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Personality traits and the perception of chief background factors, are largely influenced by educational systems. Therefore, the present study believes that a collective understanding of a particular context leads to the creation of a culture that forms the basis of entrepreneurial activities. Objectives: Examining the mediating role of blended learning infrastructures in the relationships between social capital, good governance and the general perception of business environment among the owners of small and medium sized enterprises in Fars province, Iran. Methods: This is an applied research, and in terms of data collection it is a descriptive-correlation analysis of variance based on path analysis. For data gathering, stratified sampling was applied to select 366 samples among 3887 active small and medium-sized enterprises in Fars province. Results: Good governance has a direct effect (P=0.736, sig.<0.001) as well as an indirect effect (P=0.059, sig.<0.001) on the perceived business environment through the blended learning infrastructures. Also, the direct effect of social capital on the perceived business environment (P=0.041, sig.=0.315) was not confirmed, but its indirect effect through blended learning infrastructures was confirmed (P=0.305, sig.=0.03). Conclusions: Before reinforcing the blended learning infrastructures, one needs to initially strengthen the macro political and economic factors, followed by social, cultural and educational factors, in order to improve the perceived business environment and create a positive attitude towards this atmosphere. This is due to the fact that governmental infrastructures are not yet as developed as much as the educational infrastructures for developing entrepreneurship. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Social capital؛ Good governance؛ Perceived Business Environment؛ Blended Learning Infrastructures | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Galloway L, Brown W. Entrepreneurship education at university: a driver in the creation of high growth firms? Educ and Train . 2002 Dec;44(8/9):398–405. Safari Kh. Designing a model for improving the percieved business environment in the small and medium industries (Case study: SMEs of Fars Province). Postgraduate Center of Payame Noor University; 2017. Entrialgo M, Fernandez E, Vazquez CJ. The effect of the organizational context on SME’s entrepreneurship: Some Spanish evidence. Small Bus Econ. 2001;16(3):223–36. Cuervo A. Individual and Environmental Determinants of Entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J . 2005 Sep;1(3):293–311. Rizzello S. Economic Change, Subjective Perception and Institutional Evolution. Metroeconomica . 2000 May;51(2):127–50. A. Zeithaml V. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value. J Mark . 1988;52(3):2 Welter F. Contextualizing Entrepreneurship-Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrep Theory Pract. 2011 Jan;35(1):165–84. North DC. Understanding the process of economic change. Academic foundation; 2006. Mack E, Mayer H. The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Stud . 2016 Aug 1;53(10):2118–33. Huysman M, Wulf V. Social capital and information technology. Mit Press; 2004. Grootaert C, Narayan D, Jones VN, Woolcock M. Measuring Social Capital. Washington; 2004. Report No.: 18. Adler PS, Kwon S-W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev. 2002;27(1):17–40. Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2002;69(7):681–701. Tymon WG, Stumpf SA. Social capital in the success of knowledge workers. Career Dev Int. 2003;8(1):12–20. Das TK, Teng B-S. Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Acad Manag Rev. 2002;27(3):445–56. Speck E. Leading Organizations: Perspectives for a New Era, 2nd edition , by Gill Robinson Hickman. Adm Soc Work . 2012 Nov;36(5):547–9. Sahabi B., Etesami M., Aminpour Kh., The effect of good governance and government size on financial development in selected countries. Economic growth and development research. 2014; 3 (12): 105–18. Smallbone D, Welter F. Entrepreneurship and government policy in former Societ republics: Belarus and Estonia compared. Environ Plan C Gov Policy . 2010;28(2):195–210. Herger N, Hodler R, Lobsiger M. What Determines Financial Development? Culture, Institutions or Trade. Rev World Econ . 2008 Oct;144(3):558–87. Lee J-W, W.Tai S. Motivators and inhibitors of entrepreneurship and small business development in Kazakhstan. World J Enterprenuership, Manag Sustain Dev . 2010;6:61–75. Thai MTT, Turkina E. Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur. 2014;29(4):490–510. North D. The New Institutional Economics and Development. In 1995. p. 17–26. Eschenbach F, Hoekman B. Services policy reform and economic growth in transition economies, 1990-2004. 2006. Jafari Eskandari M., AliAhmadi A., Khaleghi Gh., Heidari M., Evaluating Iran's Industrial Business Environment in Support of the Private Sector with Balanced Scorecard Approach. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management. 2011; 21 (2): 37-52. Rindermann H, Kodila-Tedika O, Christainsen G. Cognitive capital, good governance, and the wealth of nations. Intelligence . 2015 Jul;51:98–108. Khan BH. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global; 2005. Amin Bidokhti A., Nazari M., Providing a theoretical model for institutionalizing social capital components to improve economic performance. Development Strategy. 2010; (19): 53–75. Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ. Applied multivarite research: design and interpretation [Internet]. second. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2012. 1104 p. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Applied-Multivariate-Research-Design-Interpretation/dp/141298811X Huang Y. Political institutions and financial development: An empirical study. World Dev. 2010;38(12):1667–77. Smith KG, Collins CJ, Clark KD. existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad Manag J . 2005 Apr 1;48(2):346–57. Rezaei Mirghaed M., Arabiyon A., Alizadeh M., Investigating the Relationship between Entrepreneurship, Business Environment and Economic Development in GEM Member countries. Human Geography Research. 2014; 45 (84): 37-50. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 408 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 323 |
||