پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,118 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,259 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 42,336,185 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,252,597 |
Applying Path Analysis Model in Explaining the Factors Affecting the Quality and Usefulness of E-Learning: The Students’ Perspective | ||
| Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 10، شماره 3، آذر 2019، صفحه 11-22 اصل مقاله (729.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijvlms.2019.45842 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Nasim Saeid* 1؛ Mandana Goodarzi2 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Sciences, Payamnoor University, Tehran, Iran Email: N.saeed@pnu.ac.ir | ||
| 2Department of Educational Sciences, Payamnoor University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: E-learning is considered as one of the most important learning environments and the efforts and experiences of this type of learning have been studied and implemented in many countries. The purpose of this study is the application of path analysis model in explaining the factors affecting the quality and usefulness of e-learning through the student’s perspective. Methods: The research method is descriptive-correlation through using path analysis. The statistical population of the study consisted of 110 students of virtual courses of Payame Noor University (2018-2019); The questionnaire was provided to all of them through census and 70 students was answered and filled in the questionnaire. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data and the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was obtained through Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94 and validity was verified by 10 experts. Also, the validity was assessed through the internal consistency method which showed 0.87. Results: The findings of the path analysis indicated that the quality factor of the type of technology with a coefficient of influence of 0.59 had the most effect on the quality and usefulness of the education from the students perspective (P=0.001) and Content agent with an impact coefficient of 0.26 indirectly affected on the quality and usefulness of e-learning (P=0.021). Also learning methods with coefficient (0.51) directly affected on the quality and usefulness of e-learning (0.51=β). The teacher agent with coefficient0.27 has indirectly influenced on the quality and usefulness of e-learning. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, virtual education planners need to pay attention to the factors affecting the quality of courses. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| E-learning quality؛ E-learning usefulness؛ Students | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Shariatmadari M. [Education from Islamic Azad University from Traditional to Electronic]. First Conference of Electronics University, Tehran. 2009.
Bersin J. [Rapid e-learning: What works. Retrieved 2007 July 31] from: http:// download.macromedia.com/pub/ breeze/2004.
Ngai E W T, Poon L K J and Chan Y H C. [Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM]Computers & Education.2007;48: 250-267.
Fathi Vajargah K, Pardakhtchi M H & Rabeeyi M. [Effectiveness assessment of virtual education courses in higher education system of Iran (Case of Ferdowsi University of Mashad)]. Information and Communication Technology in Educational sciences.2011; 1(4):5-21.
Teo ,T. (2010). A structural equation modeling of factors influencing student teacher, satisfaction with elearning .British Journal of Educational Technology,41(6).
Tucker J P & Gentry G R. [Developing an e-learning strategy in higher education]. Foresight.2009; 11(2):43-49.
Teo T. [Development and validation of the e-learning acceptance measure] Internet and Higher Education.2010; 13: 148-152.
Khorasani A, Doosti H.[Assessment of Satisfaction and Importance of Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Electronic Education from the Viewpoint of Saman Bank Staff]. Quarterly Journal of Information and Communication Technology in the Humanities.2011;1(4).
Momeni Rad A. MSc, Aliabadi Kh [Quality assurance of e-learning by using electronic learning standards] Iranian journal of educational strategies, 2010; 3(3): 87-92.
Otarkhani A, Delavari V [Satisfaction of e-learning systems from the viewpoint students] Outlook Business Administration, 2012;10: 53-78. (In Persian).
Khodadad Hoseini H, Noori A, Zabihi MR. [.Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: Application Flow Theory, Technology Acceptance Model, and quality of electronic services]. Qur J of Research and Plan in H Edu 2013; 19(1):111-136.
Kamkarhaghighi M, Ghazisaedi M, Meraji M, Ramezan Ghorbani N, Kimiafar KH [Comparison of Open Source Learning Management Softwares and Presenting a Native Evaluation Tool] Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011:11(4): 398-407.
Daugherty M, funke BL [University faculty and student perceptions of web based instruction] Journal of distance education.1998; 3(1):45-52.
Brown B, Liedholm C [Student preferences in using online Learning resources] Social science computer Review.2004; 22(4): 479-492.
Bubb T [An analyzing interactive activity communication in online courses to determine the evolution of online communities of Learning] University of Houston. Doctoral Dissertation. 2009.
Bray N, HarrisM, Major C [New verse same ald chorus? Looking holistically at distance education research] Research in higher education. 2007; 48(7): 889-908.
Zarif Sanaee N. [Assessing the criteria for the quality and effectiveness of e-Learning in Higher education]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2011; 1(3): 24-32.
Cuellar MP,Delgado M,Pegalajar MC [Improving learning management through semantic web and social networks in e-learning environments] Expert systems with applications .2011;38:4181-4189.
Hsu H,Minchiu CH[Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance ]Decision support systems Journal.2004;38:369-381
Hosseini SN, Alavijeh M, Ataee M, Jalilian F, Karami Matin B, Rastegar L [E-learning Adoption by Faculty Members of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Faculties’ Viewpoints] Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014: 14(5): 437-447.
Khoobi M, Ahmadi hedayat M, Mohamadi N, Parvizi S, Haghani H, Izadibidani [Acomparison of nursing student’ satisfaction in compact discbased education VS. traditional education] Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2015: 15(14).
Ghasemi A, shahriarifard A, [Identifying& ranking if effecting factors on E- learning qualities] Iranian Journal of Technology of Education. 2015; 10(4): 307-317.
Bo-Anders jonsson[A case study of successful e-learning : Aweb –based distance course in medical physics held for school teachers of the upper secondary level]medical engineering&physics ,27(2005)57-581.
Rafiei M. Ghaffari H. Khorami M [evaluating the effectiveness of e- learning method in human resource education] Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2017; 4 (16): 71-84.
Antonio Garrido,Evaonaindia,Oscar sapena[Planning and scheduling in an e-leaning environment a constraintprogramming-based approach ] engineering applications of artificial intelligence,21(2008)733-743.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. [What Drives a Successful e-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction] Computers and Education. 2008; 50(4), 1183-1202.
Lee YH, Hsieh YC, Ma CY. A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-based systems. 2011 Apr 1;24(3):355-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. knosys.2010.09.005
Chao RJ, Chen YH. Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009 Sep 1;36(7):10657-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.047
Mohammadi H [Investigating users perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and success model] Computers in human behavior.2015; 45:359-374.
Rezaei Rad M. [Identifying the Success factors in e- learning programs] research in curriculum planning. 2012. 2(6): 106- 115. [In Persian]
Seraji F, Seifi A [Investigating the Role of E-Learning Skills on the Virtual Students’ Academic Achievement and Satisfaction] Technology of Instruction and Learning. 2015; 1(2): 21-57[Persian].
Zamanpour A, Mirzabiegi M [Studying the factors effecting e-learners achievement] Curriculum & Instruction Journal, 4th Year edition, 2011; 4(16): 130-164.
Hrastinski S [The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions,A case study of two e-learning courses]Information Management Journal.2008;(45):499-506.
Benta D,Bologa G,Dzitac S,Dzitac I[University level learning and teaching via e-learning platforms]procedia computer science.2015;55:1366-1373.
JohnsonR, Hornik S,SalasE[An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments]International Journal of human –computer studies .2008;(66):356-369.
Rezaei Rad M. [The Influencing Factors in Resource Management and E-Learning Processes] Journal of modern thoughts in education. 2011; 6(2): 69-82.
Akbary Boorang M, Jafari Sani H, Ahanchian MR, Kareshki H. [The evaluation of e-learning quality of iran’s universities based on curriculum orientations and faculty members ‘experiences]. Q J Res Plan High Edu. 2013; 66(1):75-97. Persian.
Hayeon S, Jihyun K, Wen L [Teacherstudent relationship in online classes:A role of teacher self-disclosur]Computers in human behavior Journal. 2016; 54:436-443.
Chensun P,Konnetchen H,Finger G[Critical functionalities of a successful e-learning system-A analysis from instructors cognitive structure to ward system usage]support systems Journal.2009;48:293-302
Hertonova N, Kohout J,Lucie R, Jiri z[Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czeh republic]Computers in human behavioral journal.2015;51:873-879.
Zamani BE. Madani SA. [Guidelines for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of teachers in virtual: education] Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2011; 2 (3): 39-50.
Hyochanlim,sang-Gunlee, kichankam [Validation E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness] International Journal of information management.2007; (27):22-35. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 343 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 535 |
||