تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,228 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,292,091 |
The effect of test-enhanced spaced learning on the otolaryngology board and annual examination results: A quasi-experimental study | ||
Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 7، شماره 3، مهر 2019، صفحه 131-137 اصل مقاله (856.12 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jamp.2019.74696 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
SASAN DABIRI1؛ AEEN MOHAMMADI* 2؛ RITA MOJTAHEDZADEH2 | ||
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Department of E-Learning in Medical Education, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Introduction: In the test-enhanced spaced learning, educational contents are presented in small packages of well-developed test questions with a defined frequency to the learners. It is not clear that applying this educational style might have a positive impact on the summative assessment. Therefore, in this study we assessed the effect of the test-enhanced spaced learning on the otolaryngology board and annual examinations of residency training. Methods: In a quasi-experimental study with consecutive sampling, all forty-four residents of otolaryngology in four levels of training in 2016 at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) received daily-standardized multiple-choice questions with a twice-repeated frequency of 10 days. Individual feedback according to one’s response to each test was provided. The results of national board and annual exam were compared with the same results of all residents of other universities and previous year TUMS’ residents for whom spaced learning were not applied and they were considered as the control groups. The board exam had two parts, multiple-choice questions, and computer-based clinical examination. The annual exam format was multiple-choice questions. The total score for each one was 150. Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparative analyses. Results: The mean of the board exam results showed statistically significant improvement compared to other medical schools (113.6±10.7 vs. 102.9±13.4 in multiple-choice questions, p=0.048, 118.7±12.5 vs. 54.1±60.0 in the computer-based clinical examination, p<0.001), while similar comparison results in the previous year did not show any significant difference. Conclusion: Spaced learning with testing effect may be useful in the clinical education setting to improve the learning outcomes. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Learning؛ Cognition؛ Internship؛ Residency؛ Otolaryngology | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Byrne JH. Learning and Memory. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Reference; 2003. 124 p. 2. Fields RD. Making memories stick. Sci Am. 2005;292(2):75-81. 3. Smolen P, Zhang Y, Byrne JH. The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(2):77-88. 4. Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(3):354-80. 5. Cepeda NJ, Vul E, Rohrer D, Wixted JT, Pashler H. Spacing effect in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(11):1095-102. 6. Lee TD, Genovese ED. Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1988;59(4):277-87. 7. Kerfoot BP. Interactive spaced education versus web based modules for teaching urology to medical students: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2351-6. 8. Mathes EF, Frieden IJ, Cho CS, Boscardin CK. Randomized controlled trial of spaced education for pediatric residency education. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):270-4. 9. Gandhi M, Beasley A, Vinas E, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Ramin SM, Kilpatrick CC. Electronic Learning- Spaced Education to Facilitate Resident Knowledge and Guide Program Didactics. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;12(Suppl 1):23s-26s. 10. Blazek MC, Dantz B, Wright MC, Fiedorowicz JG. Spaced learning using emails to integrate psychiatry into general medical curriculum: Keep psychiatry in mind. Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1049-55. 11. Andersen SA, Konge L, Caye-Thomasen P, Sorensen MS. Learning Curves of Virtual Mastoidectomy in Distributed and Massed Practice. JAMA otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(10):913-8. 12. Mammarella N, Fairfield B, Di Domenico A. Does emotion modulate the efficacy of spaced learning in recognition memory? Cogent Psychol. 2014;1:986922. 13. Glover JA. The testing phenomenon: not gone but nearly forgotten. J Educ Psychol. 1989;81(3):392-9. 14. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1(3):181-210. 15. Larsen D P, B utler A C, R oediger H L. T estenhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):959-66. 16. Evgeniou E, Loizou P. The theoretical base of e-learning and its role in surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(5):665-9. 17. Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg. 2016;103(11):1428-37. 18. Yu AY, Tian SW, Vogel D, Kwok RC. Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts? Comput Educ. 2010;55(4):1494-503. 19. Biggs J. Assessment and classroom learning: a role for summative assessment? Assessment Educ. 1998;5(1):103-10. 20. Smeds MR, Thrush CR, Mizell JS, Berry KS, Bentley FR. Mobile spaced education for surgery rotation improves National Board of Medical Examiners scores. J Surg Res. 2016;201(1):99-104. 21. Cecilio-Fernandes D, Cnossen F, Jaarsma DADC, Tio RA. Avoiding Surgical Skill Decay: A Systematic Review on the Spacing of Training Sessions. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(2):471-80. 22. Kim ASN, Wong-Kee-You AMB, Wiseheart M, Rosenbaum RS. The spacing effect stands up to big data. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51: 8. 23. Larsen DP. Picking the right dose: the challenges of applying spaced testing to education. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):349-50. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,199 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,279 |