پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,416,264 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,292,118 |
Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Three Veneering Ceramics to a Zirconia Core | ||
| Journal of Dental Biomaterials | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 2016، صفحه 186-191 اصل مقاله (314.22 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article(s) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Shima Aalaei1؛ Fatemeh Nematollahi2؛ Merooj Vartanian3؛ Elaheh Beyabanaki* 4 | ||
| 1Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3General dentist, Qazvin, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Abstract Statement of Problem: Fracture of veneering porcelain has beendescribed as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixedrestorations.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare theshear bond strength of a zirconium oxide core material to three commercialveneering ceramics.Materials and Methods: Three types of veneering ceramics were selectedincluding IPS -emax Ceram, Vita VM9, and Cerabien. Thirty blockspecimens of zirconia core material were prepared in 4×4×9 mmdimensions. Three groups were created and the veneering ceramic wasadded to each of 10 blocks. Shear bond test was conducted with universaltesting machine. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.05).Results: Mean shear bond strength values and standard deviations were26.03 MPa (6.32), 23.85 MPa (4.01), and 19.16 MPa (3.72) for VitaVM9, IPS emax Ceram, and Cerabien, respectively. Cerabien ceramicshowed more failure as compared to the other ceramics. However, therewas no significant difference among the three veneering groups.Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded thatshear bond strength between zirconia core and three veneering ceramicswas not significantly different.Statement of Problem: Fracture of veneering porcelain has beendescribed as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixedrestorations.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare theshear bond strength of a zirconium oxide core material to three commercialveneering ceramics.Materials and Methods: Three types of veneering ceramics were selectedincluding IPS -emax Ceram, Vita VM9, and Cerabien. Thirty blockspecimens of zirconia core material were prepared in 4×4×9 mmdimensions. Three groups were created and the veneering ceramic wasadded to each of 10 blocks. Shear bond test was conducted with universaltesting machine. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.05).Results: Mean shear bond strength values and standard deviations were26.03 MPa (6.32), 23.85 MPa (4.01), and 19.16 MPa (3.72) for VitaVM9, IPS emax Ceram, and Cerabien, respectively. Cerabien ceramicshowed more failure as compared to the other ceramics. However, therewas no significant difference among the three veneering groups.Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded thatshear bond strength between zirconia core and three veneering ceramicswas not significantly different. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,937 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 57 |
||