BANESHI, ALI, KARAMDOUST, NOROUZ, HAKIMZADEH, REZVAN. (1392). Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1(4), 119-124.
ALI REZA BANESHI; NOROUZ ALI KARAMDOUST; REZVAN HAKIMZADEH. "Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1, 4, 1392, 119-124.
BANESHI, ALI, KARAMDOUST, NOROUZ, HAKIMZADEH, REZVAN. (1392). 'Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1(4), pp. 119-124.
BANESHI, ALI, KARAMDOUST, NOROUZ, HAKIMZADEH, REZVAN. Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1392; 1(4): 119-124.
Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale
Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
Introduction: The present study aimed to investigate the psychometricproperties of Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Styles Scale.Method: The participants included 1039 students (421 students in human and 618 students in technical sciences), selected through the stratified sampling method from Tehran University. They answered the Grasha-Riechmann student learning style scale and the data was analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.Results: The findings acquired from exploratory factor analysis (n=561), using principal components analysis with varimax rotation showed that Grasha- Riechmann Student Learning Styles Scale includes six factors: Avoidant, Collaborative, Participative, Dependent, Competitive, and Independent. The factors acquired from confirmatory factor analysis (n=478), as model fit indices indicated, was confirmed by indices in exploratory factor analysis. The internal consistency of each subscale, ranging from 0.58 to 0.80, was at an acceptable level.Conclusion: According to the findings, it seems that Participative Styles Scale to be an instrument qualifying validity and reliability for measuring learning interactive styles.Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Grasha-Richmann scale, Learning styles
مراجع
Zhang LF, Sternberg RJ. Thinking styles, abilities, and
academic achievement among Hong Kong university
student. Hong Kong educational research association.
;13:41-62.
Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko E.L. Are cognitive styles still
in style? American psychologist. 1997;52(7):700-12.
Zhang LF. Thinking styles: Their relationships with
modes of thinking and academic performance.
Educational Psychology. 2002; 22:331â48. doi:
1080/0144341022013855.
Grasha AF, Riechmann S.W. A rational to developing
and assessing the construct validity of a student
learning styles scale instrument. Journal of Psychology.
; 87: 213-23.
Imamipour S, Shams Esfandabad, H. Learning and
cognitive styles. Tehran: Samt; 2011. Persian.
Seyf AA. Modern Educational Psychology. Tehran:
Nashre Doran; 2011. Persian.
Montgomery SM. Student learning styles and their
implications for teaching. University of Michigan Ann
Arbor, MI 1998.
Seidel LE, England EM. Gregorcâs cognitive styles: college
studentsâ preferences for teaching methods and testing
techniques. Percept Motor Skills. 1999;88(3):859-75.
Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding Student
Learning. London: Croom Helm; 2007.
Grasha AF. Teaching with style: A practical guide to