LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,442
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,292,518
Jafari, Salman, Kolivand, Sohrab. (1403). Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), 379-388. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1741
Salman Jafari; Sohrab Kolivand. "Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 4, 1403, 379-388. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1741
Jafari, Salman, Kolivand, Sohrab. (1403). 'Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), pp. 379-388. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1741
Jafari, Salman, Kolivand, Sohrab. Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 14(4): 379-388. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1741

Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 14، شماره 4، آبان 2024، صفحه 379-388    اصل مقاله (1.13 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1741
نویسندگان
Salman Jafari* 1؛ Sohrab Kolivand2
1Department of Radiology Technology, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
چکیده
Background: High-quality images with minimum radiation dose are considered a challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) scans.
Objective: The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of the Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space (IRIS) algorithm combined with Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) compared to Filtered Back Projection (FBP) in brain CT scans.
Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients underwent to brain CT scan, and images were then reconstructed using both FBP and IRIS. The CT Number (CTN), noise, and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) were computed for different tissues from CT images. The performance of two algorithms under different exposure conditions was evaluated using a water phantom. Two experienced radiologists assessed the image quality. Volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) were recorded for each scan.
Results: FBP reconstruction exhibited higher noise and lower SNR compared to IRIS, both with and without ATCM. Noise levels significantly increased for FBP combined with ATCM. Subjective analysis showed higher performance for IRIS without ATCM compared to other approaches. The mean CTDIvol with and without ATCM was 20.04±3.33 and 36.37±4.65 mGy, respectively. In the phantom study, the noise with IRIS remained lower than that with FBP even with a 42% dose reduction. 
Conclusion: IRIS algorithm can preserve the image quality when radiation dose is significantly reduced by ATCM in brain CT scan. Implementation of IRIS combined with ATCM is recommended for brain CT examinations.

تازه های تحقیق

Salman Jafari (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Brain؛ Tomography, X-Ray Computed؛ Radiation Dosages؛ Image Reconstruction؛ Image Quality Enhancement
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Taweesomboonyat C, Kaewborisutsakul A, Tunthanathip T, Saeheng S, Oearsakul T. Necessity of in-hospital neurological observation for mild traumatic brain injury patients with negative computed tomography brain scans. J Health Sci Med Res. 2020;38(4):267-74. doi: 10.31584/jhsmr.2020746.
  2. Shobeirian F, Ghomi Z, Soleimani R, Mirshahi R, Sanei Taheri M. Overuse of brain CT scan for evaluating mild head trauma in adults. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28(2):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01846-6. PubMed PMID: 32844320.
  3. Jafari S, Tavakoli MB, Zarrabi A. Lomustine Loaded Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Conjugated with Folic Acid for Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforma (GBM). Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(2):134-44. doi: 10.22037/IJPR.2020.1101032. PubMed PMID: 33224218. PubMed PMCID: PMC7667540.
  4. Novoa Ferro M, Santos Armentia E, Silva Priegue N, Jurado Basildo C, Sepúlveda Villegas CA, Del Campo Estepar S. Brain CT requests from emergency department: reality. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2022;64(5):422-32. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.08.005. PubMed PMID: 33131785.
  5. Rostampour N, Jafari S, Saeb M, Keshtkar M, Shokrani P, Almasi T. Assessment of skyshine photon dose rates from 9 and 18 MV medical linear accelerators. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2018;16(4):499-503. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.16.4.499.
  6. Bos D, Guberina N, Zensen S, Opitz M, Forsting M, Wetter A. Radiation Exposure in Computed Tomography. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023;120(9):135-41. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0395. PubMed PMID: 36633449. PubMed PMCID: PMC10198168.
  7. Cheki M, Jafari S, Najafi M, Mahmoudzadeh A. Glucosamine Protects Rat Bone Marrow Cells Against Cisplatin-induced Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(14):1695-702. doi: 10.2174/1871520619666190704164126. PubMed PMID: 31272360.
  8. Jaffe TA, Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Lowry C, Ravin C. Radiation dose for routine clinical adult brain CT: Variability on different scanners at one institution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):433-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3957. PubMed PMID: 20651201.
  9. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, El Kharras A, Bouykhlaf K, Hakam OK, Choukri A. Evaluation of radiation risks during CT brain procedures for adults. Sci Perspect. 2019;12:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.pisc.2019.100407.
  10. Jafari S, Karimi M, Khosravi H, Goodarzi R, Pourkaveh M. Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Scanning in Hamadan. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020;10(6):792-800. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2004-1099. PubMed PMID: 33364217. PubMed PMCID: PMC7753261.
  11. Joyce S, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM, McEntee MF. Strategies for dose reduction with specific clinical indications during computed tomography. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(suppl 2):S62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.012. PubMed PMID: 32682731.
  12. Nagayama Y, Iwashita K, Maruyama N, Uetani H, Goto M, Sakabe D, et al. Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(5):3253-65. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09559-3. PubMed PMID: 36973431.
  13. Fusco R, Setola SV, Raiano N, Granata V, Cerciello V, Pecori B, Petrillo A. Analysis of a monocentric computed tomography dosimetric database using a radiation dose index monitoring software: dose levels and alerts before and after the implementation of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on CT images. Radiol Med. 2022;127(7):733-42. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01481-w. PubMed PMID: 35579854.
  14. Schofield R, King L, Tayal U, Castellano I, Stirrup J, Pontana F, et al. Image reconstruction: Part 1 - understanding filtered back projection, noise and image acquisition. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.04.008. PubMed PMID: 31023632.
  15. Kataria B, Nilsson Althén J, Smedby Ö, Persson A, Sökjer H, Sandborg M. Image quality and potential dose reduction using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in abdominal CT-A review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021;195(3-4):177-87. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncab020. PubMed PMID: 33778892. PubMed PMCID: PMC8507455.
  16. Wei X, Cui L, Li Z, Yi W, Chen X, Ying J. Application of CT Image Scanning Technology Based on Iris Algorithm in Clinical Diagnosis of Patients with Hepatobiliary Stones. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics. 2021;11(1):203-8. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2021.3438.
  17. Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G. CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med. 2012;28(2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.03.003. PubMed PMID: 21497530.
  18. Hur S, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI. 80-kVp CT using Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space algorithm for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and initial clinical experience. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(2):152-64. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.152. PubMed PMID: 22438682. PubMed PMCID: PMC3303898.
  19. Söderberg M. Overview, practical tips and potential pitfalls of using automatic exposure control in CT: Siemens CARE Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4):84-91. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv459. PubMed PMID: 26567324.
  20. Duan X, Ananthakrishnan L, Guild JB, Xi Y, Rajiah P. Radiation doses and image quality of abdominal CT scans at different patient sizes using spectral detector CT scanner: a phantom and clinical study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(10):3361-8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02247-1. PubMed PMID: 31587100.
  21. Harun HH, Karim MKA, Abbas Z, Sabarudin A, Muniandy SC, Ibahim MJ. Effect of iterative reconstruction algorithm levels on noise index and figure-of-merit in CT pulmonary angiography examinations. J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28(5):893-903. doi: 10.3233/XST-200699. PubMed PMID: 32741801.
  22. Bruder H, Sunnegardh J, Stiersturter K. Translation of statistical iterative reconstruction into non-linear image processing. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; Chicago: RSNA; 2010.
  23. Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B, Danz S, Hauser TK, Ketelsen D, et al. Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(2):218-24. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2749. PubMed PMID: 22033719. PubMed PMCID: PMC7964820.
  24. Jiang D, Wang Y, Zhang P, Liu Z. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different scanning methods used for computed tomography of the unilateral shoulder. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(5):1919-26. doi: 10.1177/02841851231153031. PubMed PMID: 36775984.
  25. Wang R, Yu W, Wu R, Yang H, Lu D, Liu J, et al. Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(2):402-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7159. PubMed PMID: 22826403.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 207
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 187


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب