تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,149 |
تعداد مقالات | 10,518 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 45,415,999 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,291,644 |
The Effect of Group Counselling based on Constructive Couple Communication on Perceived Spousal Support in Uterine and Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Control Trial | ||
International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 12، شماره 3، مهر 2024، صفحه 162-174 اصل مقاله (784.31 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2024.101425.2420 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Fatemeh Azimi1؛ Fatemeh Moghaddam-Tabrizi* 1، 2؛ Rahim Sharafkhani3 | ||
1Department of Consultation on Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran; | ||
2Maternal and Childhood Obesity Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran; | ||
3Department of Public Health, School of Health, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: Uterine and Cervical cancer survivors face challenges like the disruption of emotional and sexual relationships, struggle to maintain sexual life and intimacy, and the possibility of divorce. The study aimed to determine the effect of group counseling based on couples’ constructive communication on perceived spousal support in uterine and cervical cancer survivors. Methods: A randomized controlled trial on 40 women who survived uterine and cervical cancer were recruited using convenience sampling and then randomly allocated to a couple-based constructive communication intervention group and a routine cancer center care control group from June 2019 to March 2020 in Motahhari and Imam Khomeini hospitals in Urmia. The intervention group was involved in a group counseling session weekly for 5 weeks, regarding constructive couple communication skills. Perceived spouse support was assessed using the sources of social support scale which has 4 subscales informational, instrumental, emotional, and negative support before and one week after the end of the intervention in both groups. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 through Independent and paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon, chi-square, and ANCOVA. P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The effect of the intervention was statistically significant in reducing negative support in the intervention group (2.70±0.80) in comparison with the control group (3.40±1.04) (P=0.03). It was also statistically significant in increasing informational support (3.45±0.71 vs. 2.15±0.80, P<0.001), instrumental support (3.15±0.58 vs. 2.85±0.74, P<0.001), and emotional support (19.40±1.60 vs. 16.10±2.10, P<0.001). Conclusion: Group counseling based on couple constructive communication increased perceived spousal support in uterine and cervical cancer survivors Trial Registration Number: IRCT20150125020778N22. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Cancer؛ Cervix؛ Counseling؛ Family Support؛ Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
1. Rostami S, Nahvijou A. Gynecologic Cancers Estimates in the IR Iran, 2012-2040. Basic & Clinical Cancer Research. 2022;13:111-8. 2. Joly F, Lange M, Dos Santos M, et al. Long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in breast cancer survivors. Cancers. 2019;11:1896. 3. Huda N, Shaw MK, Chang H-J. Psychological distress among patients with advanced cancer: a conceptual analysis. Cancer Nursing. 2022;45:E487-503. 4. Langer SL, Ghosh N, Todd M, et al. Usability and acceptability of a smartphone app to assess partner communication, closeness, mood, and relationship satisfaction: mixed methods study. JMIR Formative Research. 2020;4:e14161. 5. Wang T, Sun J, Gu D, et al. Dyadic effects of social support, illness uncertainty on anxiety and depression among lung cancer patients and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2023;31:402. 6. Lyons KS, Flatley C, Gorman JR, et al. Challenges experienced and resources identified by young to midlife couples 1–3 years post‐cancer diagnosis. Psycho‐Oncology. 2022;31:116-21. 7. Weitkamp K, Feger F, Landolt SA, et al. Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:722740. 8. Puleo BK. Laboratory-derived, Coded Communicative Behaviors among Individuals with Cancer and their Caregiving Partners. [Thesis]. US: Arizona State University; 2020. 9. Heavey CL, Larson BM, Zumtobel DC, Christensen A. The Communication Patterns Questionnaire: The reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1996;58:796-800. 10. Hasson-Ohayon I, Goldzweig G, Braun M, Hagedoorn M. Beyond “being open about it”: A systematic review on cancer related communication within couples. Clinical Psychology Review. 2022;96:102176. 11. Traa MJ, De Vries J, Bodenmann G, Den Oudsten BL. Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: a systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2015;20:85-114. 12. Valente M, Chirico I, Ottoboni G, Chattat R. Relationship dynamics among couples dealing with breast cancer: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18:7288. 13. Marziliano A, Tuman M, Moyer A. The relationship between post‐traumatic stress and post‐traumatic growth in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psycho‐Oncology. 2020;29:604-16. 14. Capaldi JM, Shabanian J, Finster LB, et al. Post-traumatic stress symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, and post-traumatic growth among cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review of interventions. Health Psychology Review. 2024;18:41-74. 15. Mojarad FA, Khani S, Aliabadian A, et al. The exploration of life experience of married people with genital warts: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences. 2022;9:96-104. 16. Sekse RJT, Dunberger G, Olesen ML, et al. Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer-An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019;28:1393-421. 17. Hasan Shiri F, Mohtashami J, Manoochehri H, Rohani C. Cancer Stigma and its Consequences and Influencing Factors in Iranian Society: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2022;11:180-8. 18. Zangeneh S, Savabi-Esfahani M, Taleghani F, et al. A silence full of words: sociocultural beliefs behind the sexual health of Iranian women undergoing breast cancer treatment, a qualitative study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2023;31:84. 19. Hosseini S, Macias RC, Garcia FA. The exploration of Iranian solo female travellers’ experiences. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2022;24:256-69. 20. Langer SL, Romano JM, Keefe F, et al. Couple communication in cancer: protocol for a multi-method examination. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12:769407. 21. Fergus K, Ahmad S, Gardner S, et al. Couplelinks online intervention for young couples facing breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Psycho‐Oncology. 2022;31:512-20. 22. Gremore TM, Brockstein B, Porter LS, et al. Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021;29:3267-75. 23. Zhou J, Chen X, Wang Z, Li Q. Couple-Based Communication Interventions for Cancer Patient–Spousal Caregiver Dyads’ Psychosocial Adaptation to Cancer: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2023;11:236. 24. Kinsinger SW, Laurenceau J-P, Carver CS, Antoni MH. Perceived partner support and psychosexual adjustment to breast cancer. Psychology & Health. 2011;26:1571-88. 25. Leong Bin Abdullah MFI, Hami R, Azman N, et al. Validation of the Malay Version of the Sources of Social Support Scale Among Malaysian Cancer Patients. Asean Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;18(2). 26. Brandao T, Pedro J, Nunes N, et al. Marital adjustment in the context of female breast cancer: A systematic review. Psycho‐Oncology. 2017;26:2019-29. 27. Manouchehri E, Taghipour A, Ebadi A, et al. How do I deal with breast cancer: a qualitative inquiry into the coping strategies of Iranian women survivors. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22:284. 28. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, et al. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2010;4:74-85. 29. Bodschwinna D, Weissflog G, Döhner H, et al. Couples coping with hematological cancer: support within and outside the couple–findings from a qualitative analysis of dyadic interviews. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:855638. 30. Noveiri MJS, Khodaveisi M, Shamsaei F, et al. Identifying important challenges of coping with female breast cancer among iranian spouses: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2022;17:379-87. 31. Li C, Yuan J, Huang X, et al. Correlation between depression and intimacy in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. BMC Palliative Care. 2022;21:99. 32. Brunault P, Champagne AL, Huguet G, et al. Major depressive disorder, personality disorders, and coping strategies are independent risk factors for lower quality of life in non‐metastatic breast cancer patients. Psycho‐Oncology. 2016;25:513-20. 33. Maddahi M-E, Nikpajouh A, Khalatbari J, et al. Effects of metacognitive training and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on couple communication patterns with the mediation of perceived stress, perceived social support, and emotion regulation in patients with coronary heart disease. Iranian Heart Journal. 2018;19:6-14. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,763 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,286 |