- Esmaeili Bavili, M., Seifoori, S. and Ahour T. Investigating Teacher-Learner Classroom Interaction: Learner-Contingent Feedback across Proficiency Levels and Teacher Experience. JLT. 2021; 11(4): 149-170. doi: 30495/TTLT.2021.683892.
- Erarslan, A. English language teaching and learning during Covid-19: A global perspective on the first year. J. Educ. Technol & Online Learn. 2021; 4(2):349-367. doi: 10.31681/jetol.907757.
- Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda D. E. and Ba, S. Transitioning to the new normal of learning in unpredictable times: pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2020; 17(57). doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x.
- Shahrill, M., Petra, M.I., Naing, L., Yacob, J., Santos, J.H. & Abdul Aziz, A.B.Z. New norms and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic crisis in a higher education setting: perspectives from Universiti Brunei Darussalam. Int J Educ Manag. 2021; 35(3): 700-712. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-07-2020-0347.
- Zhai Y., Du X. Addressing collegiate mental health amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 288:113003. doi: 10.1016/j.psych res.2020.113003.
- Munna, A. S. and Kalam, M. A. Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. IJHI. 2021; 4(1), 1-4. doi:10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102.
- Ellis, R. Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1990.
- Izzati, N. The Use of Teacher Talk Through Online Teaching and Learning Process in EFL Classroom During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: Proc. Nine Int. Conf. Educ. L.A. 2020: 539, 8-13, doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210325.002.
- Chen, R. How to cut high dropout rates of online courses. E-Learning Industry. 2018 March 11. Available from: https://elearningindustry.com/dropout-rates-of-online-courses-cut-high.
- Oria, V. Lowering online student dropout rates. Inside Higher Ed. 2017 June 7. Available from: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/views/2017/06/07/tools-lower-student-dropout-rates.
- Carroll, F., & Kop, R. Colouring the gaps in learning design: Aesthetics and the visual in learning. IJDET. 2016; 14(1): 92–103. doi: 10.4018/IJDET.2016010106.
- Pirrone, C. Varrasia, S., Plataniaa, G. A. and Castellanoa, S. (2021). Face-to-face and online learning: the role of technology in students’ metacognition. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Technology Enhanced Learning Environments for Blended Education. The Italian e-Learning Conference 2021. http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/ftp/pub/publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-2817.zip.
- Moreillon, J. Increasing interactivity in the online learning environment: Using digital tools to support students in socially constructed meaning-making. TechTrends. 2015; 59(3), 41–47, doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0851-0.
- Ha,Y. and Im, H. The Role of an Interactive Visual Learning Tool and its Personalizability in Online Learning: Flow Experience. Online Learn. J. 2020; 24(1): 205- 226. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339620248.
- Carroll, F., & Kop, R. Colouring the gaps in learning design: Aesthetics and the visual in learning. IJDET. (2016): 14(1): 92–103. doi:10.4018/IJDET.2016010106.
- Sun, J.N., & Hsu, Y.C. Effect of interactivity on learner perceptions in web-based instruction. Comput Human Behav. 2013; 29(1): 171–184. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.002.
- Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Sch. 2008; 45:369–386. doi: 10.1002/pits.20303.
- Pakpour, N., Souto, I., and Schaffer, P. Increasing Engagement during Online Learning through the Use of Interactive Slides. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021; 22:e00117-21. doi: 10.1128/ jmbe.00117-21.
- Lyster, R. Learning and Teaching Languages through Content: a counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2007.
- Schwartz, D., Fajardo, C. Adding Voice/Visual Interaction to Online Classes. J. Res. Innov. Teach. 2008; 1(1):145-157.
- Frischen, A., Bayless, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin. 2007; 133: 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694.
- Knowles, M.S. The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. 1970.
- Smith, P.A. Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues Account. Educ. 2001; 16(4): 663-700. doi: 10.2308/iace.2001.16.4.663.
- Ouwehand, K., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. Designing effective video-based modeling examples using gaze and gesture cues. Educational Technology and Society. 2015; 18, 78-88.
- Gibbons, P. Mediating Language Learning: Teacher Interaction with ESL Students in Content- Based Classroom. TESOL QUARTERLY. 2003; (2): 247-269. doi:10.2307/3588504.
- Al Mahadin, L., Hallak, L. The Lack of Visual Interaction in Online Classes and its Effect on the Learning Experience of Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of a Bahraini Private University Students. AUBH E-Learning Conference, Innovative Learning and Teaching: Lessons from COVID-19. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3874420.
- Azmat, M., Ahmad, A. Lack of Social Interaction in Online Classes During COVID-19. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2022, 13(2): 185-196. https://www.jmaterenvironsci.com/Document/vol13/vol13_N2/JMES-2022-13015-Azmat.pdf.
- Wang, H., Pi, Zh., Hu, W. The Instructor’s Gaze Guidance in Video Lectures Improves Learning. Wiley, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2018; 1-9. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12309.
- Pi, Zh., Xu, K., Liu, C., Yang, J. Instructor Presence in Video Lectures: Eye Gaze Matters, but not Body Orientation. Comput Educ. 2020; 144: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103713.
- Khodabandeh, F. and Karimi, B. Comparing Boredom Proneness in Traditional and Virtual English Classes. 2023, 12(1): 19-30. https://journalscmu.sinaweb.net/article_169721.html.
- Mann, S., & Robinson, A. Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. Br. Educ. Res. 2009, 35(2): 243-258. doi:10.1080/01411920802042911.
- Conty, L., George, N., & Hietanen, J. K. (2016). Watching Eyes effects: When others meet the self. Conscious Cogn. 2016; 45: 184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.016.
- Syafril, E. P. E. and Kurniawati, W. PPT-Audio; the Alternative Audio-Visual Media for Online Learning during the Corona Pandemic. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, Vol. 1823, No. 1, p. 012046. IOP Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012046.
- Lashgari, K., Talkhabi, A., Shahidian, A. Online Classes: Advantages and Disadvantages. World Rural Observations. 2011; 3(3): 77-81.
- Lyons, A., Reysen, S., Pierce, L. Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses. Comput Human Behav. 2012; 28: 181-186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.025.
- Chen, C., Wu, C. Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. J Comput Educ. 2015; 80:108-121, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015.
- Jarodzka, H., Van Gog, T., Dorr, M., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. learning to see: Guiding students’ attention via a model’s eye movements fosters learning. Learn Instr. 2013; 25: 62-70, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.004.
- Oudeyer, P-Y., Gottlieb, J., & Lopes, M. Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies. Prog. Brain Res. 2016; 229: 257–284. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005.
- Kang, H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J. Educ. evaluation health Prof. 2021; 18. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17.
- Efeotor, V. Fair, Reliable, Valid: Developing a Grammar Test Utilizing the Four Building Blocks. AWEJ. 2014; 5(4): 203-225.
- Azar, B. S., Hagan, S. A. Quoted and Reported Speech. Understanding and Using English Grammar (4th). Pearson Education; 2009.
|