پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,122 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,284 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,245,690 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,541,577 |
Comparing the effectiveness of modified Iranian and rigid Minerva braces in cervical and thoracic spine movements | ||
| Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 22 خرداد 1403 | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Articles | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2024.101296.1460 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Alireza Khalili1؛ hossein asiyaeimehr* 2؛ Mohammad taghi Karimi3؛ Amirhossein Zare4 | ||
| 1MSC student in of Orthotics and Prosthetics, school of rehabilitation sciences, Isfahan university of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Dept. of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 3rehabilitation sciences research center, Shiraz university research center, Shiraz university of medical sciences, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 4Student Research Committee, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: To facilitate the fusion of the injury site For nonoperative treatment or after surgery, various braces are available to immobilize an unstable cervical spine. The most effective and successful braces for immobilizing unstable cervical spine injuries are Minerva and Halo. The performance of cervical braces was measured by the degree of motion restriction. This study aims to obtain information on the function of modified Iranian and rigid Minerva braces compared with each other by relying on three-dimensional motion analysis as a standard method. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy male subjects without a history of spinal pain, malformation, and surgery were included in the study. This is a cross-sectional study. A 3D Motion capture system was used to record cervical and thoracic spine flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation. Range of motion was tested without a brace, with modified Iranian and rigid Minerva braces. Results: Immobilization in flexion (89.03%>87.8%) and rotation (84.85%>83.19%) were higher in the modified Iranian Minerva than in rigid Minerva, but extension (89.37%>85.95%) and lateral bending (81.26%>71.71%) were higher in rigid Minerva at cervical region (p value>0.05). In flexion (76.35% <75.96%), lateral bending (46.92% >44.5%) and extension (79.44%>62.58%) immobilization were higher in the rigid Minerva than modified Iranian Minerva, but rotation (53.04%>41.21%) was more restricted in the modified Iranian Minerva than in the rigid Minerva at the thoracic region (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: Both Minerva braces significantly reduced the neck’s range of motion (p-value<0.05). The Rigid Minerva was more effective in controlling extension and lateral bending, but the modified Iranian Minerva provided greater flexion and rotation limitations (p-value<0.05). | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Minerva؛ ROM؛ Brace؛ Cervical؛ Neck | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 71 |
||