LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,216
تعداد مقالات11,112
تعداد مشاهده مقاله76,045,808
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله100,624,091
Rashedi, Nasim, Eftekharsadat, Bina, Dolatkhah, Neda, Soleymanpour, Jafar, Salekzamani, Yaghoub, Babaie, Soraya. (1404). Assessment of Knee Angular Deformities: Correlation between Photogrammetric, Clinical, and Radiographic Methods. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(4), 71-80. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.98852.1371
Nasim Rashedi; Bina Eftekharsadat; Neda Dolatkhah; Jafar Soleymanpour; Yaghoub Salekzamani; Soraya Babaie. "Assessment of Knee Angular Deformities: Correlation between Photogrammetric, Clinical, and Radiographic Methods". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12, 4, 1404, 71-80. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.98852.1371
Rashedi, Nasim, Eftekharsadat, Bina, Dolatkhah, Neda, Soleymanpour, Jafar, Salekzamani, Yaghoub, Babaie, Soraya. (1404). 'Assessment of Knee Angular Deformities: Correlation between Photogrammetric, Clinical, and Radiographic Methods', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 12(4), pp. 71-80. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.98852.1371
Rashedi, Nasim, Eftekharsadat, Bina, Dolatkhah, Neda, Soleymanpour, Jafar, Salekzamani, Yaghoub, Babaie, Soraya. Assessment of Knee Angular Deformities: Correlation between Photogrammetric, Clinical, and Radiographic Methods. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 12(4): 71-80. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2024.98852.1371

Assessment of Knee Angular Deformities: Correlation between Photogrammetric, Clinical, and Radiographic Methods

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
دوره 12، شماره 4، اسفند 2025، صفحه 71-80    اصل مقاله (2.04 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2024.98852.1371
نویسندگان
Nasim Rashedi1؛ Bina Eftekharsadat2؛ Neda Dolatkhah2؛ Jafar Soleymanpour3؛ Yaghoub Salekzamani* 2؛ Soraya Babaie* 2
1Faculty of Medicine and Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shohada Teaching Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده
Background: Photogrammetry is a safe and non-invasive technique for evaluating posture in clinical settings. Body Vision is a novel system that employs photogrammetric principles to assess postural parameters. This study aimed to determine the relationship between clinical, photogrammetric, and radiological techniques in detecting knee angular deformities.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 53 volunteers of both genders, encompassing a total of 106 lower limbs with complaints of knee pain or knee deformity. Sampling was conducted in a non-random and accessible manner based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All participants had previously obtained full-length radiographs of their lower limbs. The clinical evaluation included measurements of the anatomical axis, Q angle, and intermalleolar and intercondylar distances. These parameters were also assessed using the Body Vision photogrammetric system while the patient was in a standing position. Data from all three methods were compared using the measured angles and distances.
Results: The evaluations indicated a strong correlation between the photogrammetric and radiological methods regarding the anatomical axis of the lower limb (r = 0.939, p < 0.001). A high correlation was also observed between the clinical and photogrammetric methods for the intermalleolar distance (r = 0.948, p < 0.001) and intercondylar distance (r = 0.927, p < 0.001). For the Q angle, a high but relatively lower correlation was found between the clinical and photogrammetric methods (r = 0.834, p < 0.001). However, a moderate correlation was detected between the clinical measurement of the anatomical axis and both the photogrammetric (r = 0.70) and radiological (r = 0.62) methods.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated a strong correlation between the photogrammetric technique and the gold standard radiological method, indicating that photogrammetry can serve as a viable alternative for evaluating knee angular deviations.

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Photogrammetry؛ Genu Varum؛ Genu Valgum؛ Knee؛ Tibiofemoral Joint
مراجع
  1. Vince KG, Cameron HU, Hungerford DS, Laskin RS, Ranawat CS, Scuderi GR. What would you do?: case challenges in knee surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:44-50.
  2. Cherian JJ, Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Jauregui JJ, Issa K, Mont MA. Mechanical, anatomical, and kinematic axis in TKA: concepts and practical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):89-95.
  3. Cooke TDV, Sled EA, Scudamore RA. Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(9):1796.
  4. Cibere J, Bellamy N, Thorne A, Esdaile JM, McGorm KJ, Chalmers A, et al. Reliability of the knee examination in osteoarthritis: effect of standardization. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):458-68.
  5. Navali AM, Bahari LAS, Nazari B. A comparative assessment of alternatives to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;4(1):1-7.
  6. Loudon JK, Jenkins W, Loudon KL. The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(2):91-7.
  7. Stricker SJ, Faustgen JP. Radiographic measurement of bowleg deformity: variability due to method and limb rotation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(2):147-51.
  8. Nguyen HC, van Egmond N, Hevesi M, Weinans H, Gielis WP, Custers RJ. A new protocol for obtaining whole leg radiographs with excellent reproducibility. JCJP. 2022;2(1):100042.
  9. Sacco IdCN, Alibert S, Queiroz B, Pripas D, Kieling I, Kimura A, et al. Confiabilidade da fotogrametria em relação a goniometria para avaliação postural de membros inferiores. Bra J Phys Ther. 2007;11:411-7.
  10. Salekzamani Y, Fakhree NA, Azimpouran M, Ebrahimi A, Heravi H, Dolatkhah N. The reliability and validity of body vision system for assessing posture. J Res Clin Med. 2021;9(1):3-.
  11. Dunk NM, Lalonde J, Callaghan JP. Implications for the use of postural analysis as a clinical diagnostic tool: reliability of quantifying upright standing spinal postures from photographic images. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(6):386-92.
  12. Furlanetto TS, Candotti CT, Comerlato T, Loss JF. Validating a postural evaluation method developed using a Digital Image-based Postural Assessment (DIPA) software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;108(1):203-12.
  13. Masso PD, Gorton III GE. Quantifying changes in standing body segment alignment following spinal instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis using an optoelectronic measurement system. Spine. 2000;25(4):457-62.
  14. Normand MC, Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Black P, Harrison DD, Holland B. Reliability and measurement error of the biotonix video posture evaluation system—part I: inanimate objects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25(4):246-50.
  15. De Carvalho RMF, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH. Analysis of the reliability and reproducibility of goniometry compared to hand photogrammetry. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(3):139.
  16. Sacco IC, Alibert S, Queiroz B, Pripas D, Kieling I, Kimura A, et al. Reliability of photogrammetry in relation to goniometry for postural lower limb assessment. Bra J Phys Ther. 2007;11:411-7.
  17. Mündermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. A comparison of measuring mechanical axis alignment using three-dimensional position capture with skin markers and radiographic measurements in patients with bilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The Knee. 2008;15(6):480-5.
  18. Lim SH, Hong BY, Oh JH, Lee JI. Relationship between knee alignment and the electromyographic activity of quadriceps muscles in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(4):1261-5.
  19. Bahadori S, Fatahi H, Ahmadpoor M. The Effect of TheraBand Training on the Q Angle and Distance of Ankle Medial Malleolus in Individuals With Genu Valgum Deformity. PhysTreat -Speci Phys Ther J. 2020;10(3):117-26.
  20. Paley D, Tetsworth K. Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs: preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res ®. 1992;280:48-64.
  21. Goulston LM, Sanchez-Santos MT, D'Angelo S, Leyland KM, Hart DJ, Spector TD, et al. A comparison of radiographic anatomic axis knee alignment measurements and cross-sectional associations with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(4):612-22.
  22. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):306.
  23. Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM. Is there an alternative to the full‐leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(2):306-13.
  24. Ribeiro AFM, Bergmann A, Lemos T, Pacheco AG, Russo MM, de Oliveira LAS, de Carvalho Rodrigues E. Reference values for human posture measurements based on computerized photogrammetry: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(3):156-68.
  25. Souza JA, Pasinato F, Basso D, Corrêa ECR, Silva AMTd. Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Rev. Bras. Cineantropometria Desempenho Hum. 2011;13:299-305.
  26. Ferreira EAG, Duarte M, Maldonado EP, Burke TN, Marques AP. Postural assessment software (PAS/SAPO): validation and reliabiliy. Clinics. 2010;65:675-81.
  27. Chevidikunnan MF, Al Saif A, Pai H, Mathias L. Comparing goniometric and radiographic measurement of Q angle of the knee. Asian Biomed. 2015;9(5):631-6.
 

 

 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 443
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 9


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب