LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,187
تعداد مقالات10,824
تعداد مشاهده مقاله72,827,198
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله12,907,549
Amiri, Pantea, Tekie, Ghazale, Azizi, Arash, Lawaf, Shirin. (1403). Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(1), 61-68. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165
Pantea Amiri; Ghazale Tekie; Arash Azizi; Shirin Lawaf. "Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26, 1, 1403, 61-68. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165
Amiri, Pantea, Tekie, Ghazale, Azizi, Arash, Lawaf, Shirin. (1403). 'Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 26(1), pp. 61-68. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165
Amiri, Pantea, Tekie, Ghazale, Azizi, Arash, Lawaf, Shirin. Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 26(1): 61-68. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165

Comparing the Effectiveness of GLUMA and 940 nm Laser for Improving Crown Retention with Self-Adhesive Cement

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 9، دوره 26، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 86، خرداد 2025، صفحه 61-68    اصل مقاله (467.9 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2024.99630.2165
نویسندگان
Pantea Amiri1؛ Ghazale Tekie1؛ Arash Azizi1؛ Shirin Lawaf* 2
1Dept. of Oral Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2Dept. of Prosthodontic, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: The retention of dental crowns plays a pivotal role in their long-term success and maintenance. According to the ongoing controversy about the effect of GLUMA desensitizer and diode laser on the retention of full metal crowns, this study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of two different methods in enhancing the bond strength of full-metal crowns.
Purpose: This study was developed to compare the effect of 940nm diode laser and GLUMA desensitizer on the bond strength of full-metal crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200).
Materials and Method: In this experimental study, 30 sound permanent maxillary first premolars were prepared; a 0.5-0.7 mm chamfer finish line was prepared above the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups: 1. control group (n=10, no treatment) 2. 940nm diode laser (N=10) 3. GLUMA desensitizer (N=10). All crowns were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200), and the bond strength was measured by universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Post HOC Tukey test in SPSS Ver:20.
Results: Crown retention in the 940 nm diode laser group (166.86±34.25 N) was significantly lower than the GLUMA desensitizer group (318.59±56.31 N) (p< 0.05), but there was no significant difference with the control group (138.17±40.81). Crown retention in the GLUMA desensitizer group was significantly higher than the other groups (p< 0.05).
Conclusion: Results of this study showed that GLUMA desensitizer had a positive effect, and 940 nm diode laser had no effect on the retention of crowns cemented by self-adhesive resin cement.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Crowns؛ Resin Cements؛ Lasers؛ Prosthesis Retention
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Blair F, Wassell R, Steele J. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: preparations for full veneer crowns. Br Dent J. 2002; 192: 561-571.
  • Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56: 416-421.
  • Wilson Jr AH, Chan DC. The relationship between preparation convergence and retention of extracoronal retainers. J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 74-78.
  • Zidan O, Ferguson GC. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 565-571.
  • Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 354-361.
  • Al-Omari WM, Al-Wahadni AM. Convergence angle, occlusal reduction, and finish line depth of full-crown preparations made by dental students. Quint Int. 2004; 35: 287-293.
  • Jalandar SS, Pandharinath DS, Arun K, Smita V. Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4: 127-133.
  • Addy M. Etiology and clinical implications of dentine hypersensitivity. Dent Clin N Am. 1990; 34: 503-514.
  • Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dent. 2013; 14: 136.
  • Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3th ed. Quintessence Publishing Company Chicago, IL: USA; 1997.
  • Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont. 1991; 4: 219-225.
  • Arrais CAG, Chan DCN, Giannini M. Effects of desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004; 12: 144-148.
  • Schupbach P, Lutz F, Finger W. Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105: 414-421.
  • Umana M, Heysselaer D, Tielemans M, Compere P, Zeinoun T, Nammour S. Dentinal tubules sealing by means of diode lasers (810 and 980 nm): a preliminary in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013; 31: 307-314.
  • Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A, Kalhori KA. An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er; Cr: YSGG, Nd: YAG, CO2 and diode lasers on dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29: 115-121.
  • Reddy GV, Akula S, Malgikar S, Babu PR, Reddy GJ, Josephin JJ. Comparative scanning electron microscope analysis of diode laser and desensitizing toothpastes for evaluation of efficacy of dentinal tubular occlusion. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017; 21: 102.
  • Ladalardo TCCGP, Pinheiro A, Campos RAdC, Brugnera Júnior A, Zanin F, Albernaz PLM, et al. Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J. 2004; 15: 144-150.
  • Orhan K, Aksoy U, Can-Karabulut DC, Kalender A. Low-level laser therapy of dentin hypersensitivity: a short-term clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2011; 26: 591-598.
  • Lawaf S, Jalalian E, Roshan R, Azizi A. Effect of GLUMA desensitizer on the retention of full metal crowns cemented with Rely X U200 self-adhesive cement. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8: 404-410.
  • Gupta T, Nagaraja S, Mathew S, Narayana IH, Madhu K, Dinesh K. Effect of desensitization using bioactive glass, hydroxyapatite, and diode laser on the shear bond strength of resin composites measured at different time intervals: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017; 8: 244.
  • Mapkar MA, Jagtap A, Asadullah SRS. Effect of two different types of desensitizing agents on crown retention using glass ionomer cement. Int J Oral Care Res. 2018; 6: 12.
  • Fatih S, Şahin O, Özdemir AK. Effect of dentin desensitizers and Nd: YAG laser pre-treatment on microshear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Cumhur Dent J. 2019; 22: 156-166.
  • Asadullah SRS, Rakhewar P, Mapkar MA. Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with resinomer cement: an in vitro study. Int J Preventive Clin Dent Res. 2018; 5: 5.
  • Sailer I, Oendra AEH, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CH. The effects of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with self-adhesive and conventional resincements. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107: 252-260.
  • Stawarczyk B, Hartmann R, Hartmann L, Roos M, Özcan M, Sailer I, et al. The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging. Oper Dent. 2011; 36: 492-501.
  • Elizalde-Hernández A, Hardan L, Bourgi R, Isolan CP, Moreira AG, Zamarripa-Calderón JE, et al. Effect of different desensitizers on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Bioeng. 2022; 9: 372.
  • Femiano F, Femiano R, Lanza A, Festa MV, Rullo R, Perillo L. Efficacy of diode laser in association to sodium fluoride vs Gluma desensitizer on treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity. A double blind controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2013; 26: 214-218.
  • Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Göhring TN, Waltimo TM. Glutaraldehyde in bonding systems disinfects dentin in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6: 61-64.
  • Acar O, Tuncer D, Yuzugullu B, Celik C. The effect of dentin desensitizers and Nd: YAG laser pre-treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 88-95.
  • Liu Y, Gao J, Gao Y, Shuaimei X, Zhan X, Wu B. In vitro study of dentin hypersensitivity treated by 980-nm diode laser. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 4: 111.
  • Kasraei S, Yarmohamadi E, Jahromi PR, Akbarzadeh M. Effect of 940nm diode laser irradiation on microtensile bond strength of an etch and rinse adhesive (single bond 2) to dentin. J Dent. 2019; 20: 30.
  • Maenosono RM, Bim Junior O, Duarte MAH, PalmaDibb RG, Wang L, Ishikiriama SK. Diode laser irradiation increases microtensile bond strength of dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 29: 1-5.
  • Mubaraq RM, Hussein BMA. PDF Influence of Er: Cr; YSGG laser Desensitization on SBS of resin cement to dentin. Iraqi J Las. 2022; 21: 18-27.
  • Souza-Gabriel AE, Curylofo-Zotti FA, Scatolin RS, Corona SAM. Post-treatment with high-power lasers to improve bond strength of adhesive systems to bleached dentin. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017; 31: 1888-1899.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 311
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 258


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب