LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,143
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,867
Ataei, Morteza, Pakizeh, Ali, Dehghani, Yousef, Cheraghi, Fariba. (1403). Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), 105-113. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2024.101374.1379
Morteza Ataei; Ali Pakizeh; Yousef Dehghani; Fariba Cheraghi. "Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 2, 1403, 105-113. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2024.101374.1379
Ataei, Morteza, Pakizeh, Ali, Dehghani, Yousef, Cheraghi, Fariba. (1403). 'Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), pp. 105-113. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2024.101374.1379
Ataei, Morteza, Pakizeh, Ali, Dehghani, Yousef, Cheraghi, Fariba. Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 11(2): 105-113. doi: 10.30476/intjsh.2024.101374.1379

Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students

International Journal of School Health
مقاله 4، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 42، تیر 2024، صفحه 105-113    اصل مقاله (247.46 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Article (s)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/intjsh.2024.101374.1379
نویسندگان
Morteza Ataei* 1؛ Ali Pakizeh2؛ Yousef Dehghani2؛ Fariba Cheraghi1
1Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Boushehr, Iran
2Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Boushehr, Iran
چکیده
Background: Many individuals, particularly adolescents, often deal with anxiety which in turn impacts their environmental perception. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of group schema therapy and cognitive bias modification (CBM) on test anxiety in high school male adolescents.
Method: This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design, two experimental groups, and a control group. The statistical population included all male high school students of Abadan, Iran in the academic year of 2020-2023. A total number of 45 people were selected using the convenience sampling method from secondary high schools in Abadan, Iran. Fortyfive students were assigned into two experimental groups and a control group (15 students in each group). The first experimental group received schema therapy (eight 90-minute sessions; one session every week) and the second experimental group received cognitive bias modification (eight 20-minute sessions; two sessions every week). The control group was considered on the waiting list. The General Self-Efficacy Scale was used for data collection. The tools used were Ahvaz Test Anxiety Inventory )ATI) and Probe Dot Task (PDT). SPSS version 25 was applied to analyze covariance.
Results: Most of the participants were mathematics (64%) and a tenth grade (62%) students. The study results showed a significant difference between Schema Therapy, CBM, and control groups in test anxiety based on the pre-test and pre-test scores (P=0.001). Also, the experimental and control groups had significant differences in reaction time and attentional bias based on the pre-test and pre-test scores (P=0.001, P=0.025, P=0.038, P=0.026). The Schema Therapy and CBM groups also showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test observations (P=0.001). However, no difference was found in the control group based on pre-test and post-test scores (P=0.054, P=0.424, P=0.709, P=0.066).
Conclusions: Schema therapy and CBM groups showed a significant difference in test anxiety between the pre-test and post-test observations. However, no difference was found in the control group. Given the pre- and post-test scores, the CBM experimental group and the control group showed significant differences in reaction time and attentional bias However, there were no significant differences in the control group. Thus, it can be concluded that these two treatment models can be used to reduce the mentioned psychological abnormalities in students and help improve their mental health.

تازه های تحقیق

Morteza Ataei: (Google Scholar)

 

 

How to Cite: Ataei M, Pakizeh A, Dehghani Y, Cheraghi F. Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification on Test Anxiety in Male Students. Int. J. School. Health. 2024;11(2):105-113. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2024.101374.1379.

کلیدواژه‌ها
Schema therapy؛ Cognitive bias modification (CBM)؛ Test anxiety؛ Male؛ Student
مراجع
  1. Larsen B, Luna B. Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:179-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.005. PubMed PMID: 30201220; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6526538.
  2. Scott-Parker B. Emotions, behaviour, and the adolescent driver: A literature review. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour. 2017;50:1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.019.
  3. Zhang Y, Qin P. Comprehensive review: Understanding adolescent identity. Studies in Psychological Science. 2023;1(2):17-31. doi: 10.56397/SPS.2023.09.02.
  4. Garagiola ER, Lam Q, Wachsmuth LS, Tan TY, Ghali S, Asafo S, Swarna M. Adolescent Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Impact of the Pandemic on Developmental Milestones. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022;12(7):220. doi: 10.3390/bs12070220. PubMed PMID: 35877290; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9311591.
  5. Schlack R, Peerenboom N, Neuperdt L, Junker S, Beyer AK. The effects of mental health problems in childhood and adolescence in young adults: Results of the KiGGS cohort. J Health Monit. 2021;6(4):3-19. doi: 10.25646/8863. PubMed PMID: 35146318; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8734087.
  6. Parodi KB, Holt MK, Green JG, Porche MV, Koenig B, Xuan Z. Time trends and disparities in anxiety among adolescents, 2012-2018. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022;57(1):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02122-9. PubMed PMID: 34100110; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8183580.
  7. Pizzie RG, Kraemer DJ. The association between emotion regulation, physiological arousal, and performance in math anxiety. Front Psychol. 2021;12:639448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639448. PubMed PMID: 34045991; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8144633.
  8. Torrano R, Ortigosa JM, Riquelme A, Méndez FJ, López-Pina JA. Test Anxiety in Adolescent Students: Different Responses According to the Components of Anxiety as a Function of Sociodemographic and Academic Variables. Front Psychol. 2020;11:612270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612270. PubMed PMID: 33384650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7770170.
  9. Ismail SM, Rahul DR, Patra I, Rezvani E. Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Lang Test Asia. 2022;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9468254.
  10. Hanfesa S, Tilahun T, Dessie N, Shumet S, Salelew E. Test Anxiety and Associated Factors Among First-Year Health Science Students of University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:817-824. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S275490. PubMed PMID: 33173370; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7646484.
  11. Sapp M. Test anxiety: Applied research, assessment, and treatment interventions. University Press of America; 2013.
  12. Von der Embse N, Jester D, Roy D, Post J. Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:483-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048. PubMed PMID: 29156362.
  13. Heissel JA, Adam EK, Doleac JL, Figlio DN, Meer J. Testing, stress, and performance: How students respond physiologically to high-stakes testing. Education Finance & Policy. 2021;16(2):183-208. doi: 10.1162/edfp_a_00306.
  14. Gunnell D, Kidger J, Elvidge H. Adolescent mental health in crisis. BMJ. 2018;361:k2608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2608. PubMed PMID: 29921659.
  15. Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ. Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. Handbook of early childhood intervention; 1990.
  16. McGorry PD, Mei C. Early intervention in youth mental health: progress and future directions. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(4):182-184. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300060. PubMed PMID: 30352884; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10270418.
  17. Colizzi M, Lasalvia A, Ruggeri M. Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9. PubMed PMID: 32226481; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7092613.
  18. Yang-Yen HF, Chambard JC, Sun YL, Smeal T, Schmidt TJ, Drouin J, et al. Transcriptional interference between c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor: mutual inhibition of DNA binding due to direct protein-protein interaction. Cell. 1990;62(6):1205-15. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90396-v. PubMed PMID: 2169352.
  19. Jacob GA, Arntz A. Schema therapy for personality disorders—A review. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2013;6(2):171-85. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2013.6.2.171.
  20. Peeters N, Stappenbelt S, Burk WJ, van Passel B, Krans J. Schema therapy with exposure and response prevention for the treatment of chronic anxiety with comorbid personality disorder. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021;60(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12271. PubMed PMID: 33319395; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7898627.
  21. Baljé A, Greeven A, van Giezen A, Korrelboom K, Arntz A, Spinhoven P. Group schema therapy versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder with comorbid avoidant personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1605-9. PubMed PMID: 27717405; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5055701.
  22. Beard C. Cognitive bias modification for anxiety: current evidence and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(2):299-311. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.194. PubMed PMID: 21306216; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3092585.
  23. Yiend J, Savulich G, Coughtrey A, Shafran R. Biased interpretation in perfectionism and its modification. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(12):892-900. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.004. PubMed PMID: 22030297.
  24. MacLeod C, Koster EH, Fox E. Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(1):89-99. doi: 10.1037/a0014878. PubMed PMID: 19222317.
  25. Dodd DR, Parsons EM, Clerkin EM, Forrest LN, Velkoff EA, Kunstman JW, et al. Perfectly imperfect: The use of cognitive bias modification to reduce perfectionism. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019;64:167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.04.002. PubMed PMID: 31071484.
  26. Saeedmanesh M, Azizi M, Hematian Z. The Effectiveness of Mindfulness and the Attention Bias Program on Attention, Inhibition and Emotional Regulation in Children with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. JCP. 2020;8(2):33-45. Persian.
  27. Arsanjani M, Zargham Hajebi M, Mirzahosseini H. The Effect of Cognitive Bias Modification in the Attention Bias of Students With Test Anxiety. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2020;13(4):325-334.
  28. Shafiei S, Zare A. Methodology of Meta-analysis in information science: nature, characteristics and challenges. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science. 2019;11(1):57-72. doi: 10.22055/slis.2017.15971.1159. Persian.
  29. Aboighasemi A, Asadi Moghaddam A, Najarian B, Shokrkon H. Construction and validation of a test for the measurement of test anxiety among Ahwaz guidance school Students. Psychological Achievements. 1996;3(2):61-74. doi: 22055/psy.1996.16383. Persian.
  30. Dizaj Khalili M, Makvand Hosseini S, Sabahi P. The Effect of Imagery Rescripting and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Emotional Exhaustion in Women with Multiple Sclerosis in Tehran, Iran. Women Health Bull. 2022;9(3):164-171. doi: 10.30476/whb.2022.95439.1181.
  31. Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M, Aboighasemi A, Najarian B, Shokrkon H. A Study of Epidemiology of Test Anxiety and the Relations of Self-Efficacy and Locus of Control with it as moderated by Intelligence. Psychological Achievements. 2000;7(1):55-72. doi 10.22055/psy.1999.16449. Persian.
  32. Mokhtarinejad O, Mirzaian B, Hassanzadeh R. Comparison of the effectiveness of schema therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on perception of disease and worry in patients with illness anxiety disorder. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2020;22(3):58-67. doi: 30699/icss.22.3.58. Persian.
  33. Hayatipoor S, Bavi S, Khalafi A, Dasht Bozorgi Z, Gatezadeh A. Effects of Stress Management Training on Cognitive Avoidance and Emotion Regulation Strategies in Female Students with Social Anxiety Disorder: A Mindfulness and Emotional Schema Therapy Approach. Int J School Health. 2024;11(1):40-49. doi: 10.30476/INTJSH.2023.100698.1357.
  34. Penney ES, Norton AR. A novel application of the schema therapy mode model for social anxiety disorder: A naturalistic case study. Clinical Case Studies. 2022;21(1):34-47. doi: 10.1177/15346501211027866.
  35. Barlow DH, Raffa SD, Cohen EM. Psychosocial treatments for panic disorders, phobias, and generalized anxiety disorder. A guide to treatments that work; 2002.
  36. Hawke LD, Provencher MD. Schema theory and schema therapy in mood and anxiety disorders: A review. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2011;25(4):257-76. doi: 1891/0889-8391.25.4.257.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 285
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 350


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب