LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,450
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,292,528
Kargar, Niloofar, Zeinali, Ahad, Molazadeh, Mikaeil. (1403). Impact of Dose Calculation Algorithms and Radiobiological Parameters on Prediction of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Left Breast Radiation Therapy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(2), 129-140. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1616
Niloofar Kargar; Ahad Zeinali; Mikaeil Molazadeh. "Impact of Dose Calculation Algorithms and Radiobiological Parameters on Prediction of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Left Breast Radiation Therapy". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 2, 1403, 129-140. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1616
Kargar, Niloofar, Zeinali, Ahad, Molazadeh, Mikaeil. (1403). 'Impact of Dose Calculation Algorithms and Radiobiological Parameters on Prediction of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Left Breast Radiation Therapy', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(2), pp. 129-140. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1616
Kargar, Niloofar, Zeinali, Ahad, Molazadeh, Mikaeil. Impact of Dose Calculation Algorithms and Radiobiological Parameters on Prediction of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Left Breast Radiation Therapy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 14(2): 129-140. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1616

Impact of Dose Calculation Algorithms and Radiobiological Parameters on Prediction of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Left Breast Radiation Therapy

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 14، شماره 2، تیر 2024، صفحه 129-140    اصل مقاله (987.77 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1616
نویسندگان
Niloofar Kargar1؛ Ahad Zeinali* 1؛ Mikaeil Molazadeh2
1Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده
Background: Breast cancer requires evaluating treatment plans using dosimetric and biological parameters. Considering radiation dose distribution and tissue response, healthcare professionals can optimize treatment plans for better outcomes.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the different Dose Calculation Algorithms (DCAs) and Biologically Model-Related Parameters (BMRPs) on the prediction of cardiopulmonary complications due to left breast radiotherapy.
Material and Methods: In this practical study, the treatment plans of 21 female patients were simulated in the Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS) with a prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Dose distribution was extracted using the three DCAs [Pencil Beam (PB), Collapsed Cone (CC), and Monte Carlo (MC)]. Cardiopulmonary complications were predicted by Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) calculations using different dosimetric and biological parameters. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and Relative-Seriality (RS) models were used to calculate NTCP. The endpoint for NTCP calculation was pneumonitis, pericarditis, and late cardiac mortality. The ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: In calculating Tumor Control Probability (TCP), a statistically significant difference was observed between the results of DCAs in the Poisson model. The PB algorithm estimated NTCP as less than others for all Pneumonia BMRPs. 
Conclusion: The impact of DCAs and BMRPs differs in the estimation of TCP and NTCP. DCAs have a stronger influence on TCP calculation, providing more effective results. On the other hand, BMRPs are more effective in estimating NTCP. Consequently, parameters for radiobiological indices should be cautiously used s to ensure the appropriate consideration of both DCAs and BMRPs.

تازه های تحقیق

Ahad Zeinali (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Breast Neoplasms؛ Radiotherapy؛ Tumor Control Probability؛ Normal Tissue Complications Probability؛ Dose Calculation Algorithm؛ Models, Biological
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Xie Y, Bourgeois D, Guo B, Zhang R. Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques. Med Dosim. 2020;45(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.04.005. PubMed PMID: 31129035. PubMed PMCID: PMC6874719.
  2. Cozzi L, Buffa FM, Fogliata A. Comparative analysis of dose volume histogram reduction algorithms for normal tissue complication probability calculations. Acta Oncol. 2000;39(2):165-71. doi: 10.1080/028418600430725. PubMed PMID: 10859006.
  3. Newhauser WD, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Schulte R, Lee C. A Review of Radiotherapy-Induced Late Effects Research after Advanced Technology Treatments. Front Oncol. 2016;6:13. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00013. PubMed PMID: 26904500. PubMed PMCID: PMC4748041.
  4. Ojala JJ, Kapanen MK, Hyödynmaa SJ, Wigren TK, Pitkänen MA. Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(2):4-18. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4662. PubMed PMID: 24710454. PubMed PMCID: PMC5875463.
  5. Warkentin B, Stavrev P, Stavreva N, Field C, Fallone BG. A TCP-NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2004;5(1):50-63. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1970. PubMed PMID: 15753933. PubMed PMCID: PMC5723441.
  6. Bufacchi A, Nardiello B, Capparella R, Begnozzi L. Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8(1):164. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-164. PubMed PMID: 23826854. PubMed PMCID: PMC3750611.
  7. Petillion S, Swinnen A, Defraene G, Verhoeven K, Weltens C, Van Den Heuvel F. The photon dose calculation algorithm used in breast radiotherapy has significant impact on the parameters of radiobiological models. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(4):259-69. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4853. PubMed PMID: 25207416. PubMed PMCID: PMC5875495.
  8. Allen Li X, Alber M, Deasy JO, Jackson A, Ken Jee KW, Marks LB, et al. The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2012;39(3):1386-409. doi: 10.1118/1.3685447. PubMed PMID: 22380372.
  9. Chaikh A, Docquière N, Bondiau PY, Balosso J. Impact of dose calculation models on radiotherapy outcomes and quality adjusted life years for lung cancer treatment: do we need to measure radiotherapy outcomes to tune the radiobiological parameters of a normal tissue complication probability model? Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5(6):673-80. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.11.04. PubMed PMID: 28149761. PubMed PMCID: PMC5233866.
  10. Kaneko A, Sumida I, Mizuno H, Isohashi F, Suzuki O, Seo Y, et al. Comparison of gamma index based on dosimetric error and clinically relevant dose-volume index based on three-dimensional dose prediction in breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1233-0. PubMed PMID: 30808377. PubMed PMCID: PMC6390354.
  11. Bufacchi A, Caspiani O, Rambaldi G, Marmiroli L, Giovinazzo G, Polsoni M. Clinical implication in the use of the AAA algorithm versus the AXB in nasopharyngeal carcinomas by comparison of TCP and NTCP values. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01591-7. PubMed PMID: 32532351. PubMed PMCID: PMC7291676.
  12. Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J. Report No. 50: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements; Washington, DC: ICRU; 1993.
  13. Nielsen MH, Berg M, Pedersen AN, Andersen K, Glavicic V, Jakobsen EH, et al. Delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer: national guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(4):703-10. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.765064. PubMed PMID: 23421926.
  14. Rana S, Greco K, Samuel EJJ, Bennouna J. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(8):36-46. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12676. PubMed PMID: 31343826. PubMed PMCID: PMC6698765.
  15. Owen JR, Ashton A, Bliss JM, Homewood J, Harper C, Hanson J, et al. Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early-stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(6):467-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70699-4. PubMed PMID: 16750496.
  16. Okunieff P, Morgan D, Niemierko A, Suit HD. Radiation dose-response of human tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32(4):1227-37. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00475-z. PubMed PMID: 7607946.
  17. Martel MK, Sahijdak WM, Ten Haken RK, Kessler ML, Turrisi AT. Fraction size and dose parameters related to the incidence of pericardial effusions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00584-1. PubMed PMID: 9422572.
  18. Gagliardi G, Lax I, Ottolenghi A, Rutqvist LE. Long-term cardiac mortality after radiotherapy of breast cancer--application of the relative seriality model. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(825):839-46. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-825-839. PubMed PMID: 8983588.
  19. Gagliardi G, Constine LS, Moiseenko V, Correa C, Pierce LJ, Allen AM, Marks LB. Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.093. PubMed PMID: 20171522.
  20. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):109-22. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y. PubMed PMID: 2032882.
  21. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, Goitein M. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z. PubMed PMID: 2032883.
  22. Kwa SL, Lebesque JV, Theuws JC, Marks LB, Munley MT, Bentel G, et al. Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: an analysis of pooled data of 540 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00196-5. PubMed PMID: 9747813.
  23. Seppenwoolde Y, Lebesque JV, De Jaeger K, Belderbos JS, Boersma LJ, Schilstra C, et al. Comparing different NTCP models that predict the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. Normal tissue complication probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(3):724-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03986-x. PubMed PMID: 12573760.
  24. Gagliardi G, Bjöhle J, Lax I, Ottolenghi A, Eriksson F, Liedberg A, et al. Radiation pneumonitis after breast cancer irradiation: analysis of the complication probability using the relative seriality model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46(2):373-81. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00420-4. PubMed PMID: 10661344.
  25. Ågren Cronqvist A-K. Quantification of the response of heterogeneous tumours and organized normal tissues to fractionated radiotherapy. Stockholm University; 1995.
  26. Barry MA, Hussein M, Schettino G. Evaluating the Propagation of Uncertainties in Biologically Based Treatment Planning Parameters. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1058. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01058. PubMed PMID: 32793468. PubMed PMCID: PMC7386327.
  27. Liang X, Penagaricano J, Zheng D, Morrill S, Zhang X, Corry P, et al. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:1-11. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0578-2. PubMed PMID: 26800883. PubMed PMCID: PMC4724090.
  28. Chetty IJ, Devpura S, Liu D, Chen D, Li H, Wen NW, et al. Correlation of dose computed using different algorithms with local control following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109(3):498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.012. PubMed PMID: 24231237.
  29. Liu MB, Eclov NC, Trakul N, Murphy J, Diehn M, Le QT, et al. Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3(4):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.003. PubMed PMID: 24674401.
  30. Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL, Kappas C, Klein E, Mackie TR. Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for mega voltage photon beams. AAPM Report No. 85; Madison, WI, USA: American Asociation of Physicists in Medicine by Medical Physics Publishing; 2004.
  31. Chaikh A, Khamphan C, Kumar T, Garcia R, Balosso J. What should we know about photon dose calculation algorithms used for radiotherapy? Their impact on dose distribution and medical decisions based on TCP/NTCP. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2016;4(4):4418. doi: 10.14319/ijcto.44.18.
  32. Molazadeh M, Robatjazi M, Geraily G, Rezaeejam H, Zeinali A, Shirazi A. Three-dimensional IMRT QA of Monte Carlo and full scatter convolution algorithms based on 3D film dosimetry. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2021;186:109528. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109528.
  33. Molazadeh M, Zeinali A, Robatjazi M, Shirazi A, Geraily G. Dosimetric characteristics of LinaTech DMLC H multi leaf collimator: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(2):113-24. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12055. PubMed PMID: 28300380. PubMed PMCID: PMC5689964.
  34. Nisbet A, Beange I, Vollmar HS, Irvine C, Morgan A, Thwaites DI. Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone algorithm in simulated clinical situations. Radiother Oncol. 2004;73(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.06.007. PubMed PMID: 15465150.
  35. Lu L, Yembi-Goma G, Wang JZ, Gupta N, Huang Z, Lo SS, et al. A practical method to evaluate and verify dose calculation algorithms in the treatment planning system of radiation therapy. Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol. 2013;2(3):76. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2013.23011.
  36. Elcim Y, Dirican B, Yavas O. Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(5):616-24. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12426. PubMed PMID: 30079474. PubMed PMCID: PMC6123106.
  37. Zhuang T, Djemil T, Qi P, Magnelli A, Stephans K, Videtic G, Xia P. Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(2):38-51. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4011. PubMed PMID: 23470930. PubMed PMCID: PMC5714368.
  38. Liu H, Zhuang T, Stephans K, Videtic G, Raithel S, Djemil T, Xia P. Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(6):91-9. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5514. PubMed PMID: 26699560. PubMed PMCID: PMC5690987.
  39. Lu L. Dose calculation algorithms in external beam photon radiation therapy. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2014;1(2):01025. doi: 10.14319/ijcto.0102.5.
  40. Suchorska WM. Radiobiological models in prediction of radiation cardiotoxicity. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020;25(1):46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.001. PubMed PMID: 31889920. PubMed PMCID: PMC6931197.
  41. Nielsen TB, Wieslander E, Fogliata A, Nielsen M, Hansen O, Brink C. Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the predicted dose distribution and NTCP values for NSCLC patients. Med Phys. 2011;38(5):2412-8. doi: 10.1118/1.3575418. PubMed PMID: 21776775.
  42. Chaikh A, Ojala J, Khamphan C, Garcia R, Giraud JY, Thariat J, Balosso J. Dosimetrical and radiobiological approach to manage the dosimetric shift in the transition of dose calculation algorithm in radiation oncology: how to improve high quality treatment and avoid unexpected outcomes? Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1005-2. PubMed PMID: 29615079. PubMed PMCID: PMC5883266.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 70,337
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 342


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب