LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,965
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,606
Zahediannasb, Roohollah, Nami, Mohammad, Hosseini, Maryam, Abolhasani Foroughi, Amin, Ghodsinejad, Amirsaeed, Aligholi, Hadi. (1403). The Effect of Frontopolar Cortical Cooling on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(4), 221-227. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2023.100307.1431
Roohollah Zahediannasb; Mohammad Nami; Maryam Hosseini; Amin Abolhasani Foroughi; Amirsaeed Ghodsinejad; Hadi Aligholi. "The Effect of Frontopolar Cortical Cooling on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 4, 1403, 221-227. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2023.100307.1431
Zahediannasb, Roohollah, Nami, Mohammad, Hosseini, Maryam, Abolhasani Foroughi, Amin, Ghodsinejad, Amirsaeed, Aligholi, Hadi. (1403). 'The Effect of Frontopolar Cortical Cooling on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(4), pp. 221-227. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2023.100307.1431
Zahediannasb, Roohollah, Nami, Mohammad, Hosseini, Maryam, Abolhasani Foroughi, Amin, Ghodsinejad, Amirsaeed, Aligholi, Hadi. The Effect of Frontopolar Cortical Cooling on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 11(4): 221-227. doi: 10.30476/jrsr.2023.100307.1431

The Effect of Frontopolar Cortical Cooling on Working Memory Capacity in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
دوره 11، شماره 4، اسفند 2024، صفحه 221-227    اصل مقاله (1.31 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Articles
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jrsr.2023.100307.1431
نویسندگان
Roohollah Zahediannasb1، 2، 3؛ Mohammad Nami4؛ Maryam Hosseini1، 2، 3؛ Amin Abolhasani Foroughi5؛ Amirsaeed Ghodsinejad3؛ Hadi Aligholi* 1، 2
1Department of Neuroscience, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Neuroscience Laboratory (Brain, Cognition and Behavior), Department of Neuroscience, School of
3DANA Brain Health Institute, Iranian Neuroscience Society, Fars Branch, Shiraz, Iran
4Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Unit, Department of Social Sciences, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
5Medical Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Namazee Hospital, Shiraz University
چکیده
Background: Since brain temperature fluctuations are related to cognitive disorders, regulating brain temperature has become a key focus in cognitive studies. This study examined the effect of frontopolar cortical cooling on working memory using a cortical thermal stimulation device (CTSD).
 Methods: This phase II, randomized, controlled trial included twenty participants randomly divided into two groups to receive 30 minutes of frontopolar cortical cooling across four sessions. The control group received sham cooling, while the intervention group received real cooling. Spatial working memory tests were recorded from both groups before and after the first and after the fourth sessions. The cortical thermal stimulation device used for cooling operates through the flow of water and alcohol in a closed loop.
Results: After four sessions of frontopolar cortical cooling, a significant improvement in working memory was observed. The analysis of working memory results, based on an ANCOVA test, showed an improvement in the Spatial Working Memory (SWM) test in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Considering the positive effect of frontopolar cortical cooling on working memory capacity, the results suggest that using an appropriate tool for cooling the cerebral cortex could become a practical approach in cognitive rehabilitation.
 

تازه های تحقیق
کلیدواژه‌ها
Brain؛ Cognitive Training؛ Humans؛ Memory؛ Temperature
مراجع
  1. McLeod SA. Stages of memory-encoding storage and retrieval. Retrieved. 2007;21:2015.
  2. Cowan N. Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational psychology review. 2014;26:197-223.
  3. Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience. 2001;24(1):167-202.
  4. Haber SN, Liu H, Seidlitz J, Bullmore E. Prefrontal connectomics: from anatomy to human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):20-40.
  5. D’Ardenne K, Eshel N, Luka J, Lenartowicz A, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. Role of prefrontal cortex and the midbrain dopamine system in working memory updating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(49):19900-9.
  6. Eriksson J, Vogel EK, Lansner A, Bergström F, Nyberg L. Neurocognitive architecture of working memory. Neuron. 2015;88(1):33-46.
  7. Annweiler C, Allali G, Allain P, Bridenbaugh S, Schott AM, Kressig RW, et al. Vitamin D and cognitive performance in adults: a systematic review. European Journal of Neurology. 2009;16(10):1083-9.
  8. Hausmann M. Why sex hormones matter for neuroscience: A very short review on sex, sex hormones, and functional brain asymmetries. Journal of neuroscience research. 2017;95(1-2):40-9.
  9. Bherer L, Erickson KI, Liu-Ambrose T. A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. Journal of aging research. 2013;2013.
  10. Wright Jr KP, Hull JT, Czeisler CA. Relationship between alertness, performance, and body temperature in humans. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2002;283(6):R1370-R7.
  11. Papo D. Brain temperature: what it means and what it can do for (cognitive) neuroscientists. arXiv preprint arXiv:13102906. 2013.
  12. Khan VR, Brown IR. The effect of hyperthermia on the induction of cell death in brain, testis, and thymus of the adult and developing rat. Cell stress & chaperones. 2002;7(1):73.
  13. Fazel Bakhsheshi M, Keenliside L, Lee T-Y. A novel selective cooling system for the brain: feasibility study in rabbits vs piglets. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. 2018;6:1-12.
  14. Walter EJ, Carraretto M. The neurological and cognitive consequences of hyperthermia. Critical Care. 2016;20(1):199.
  15. Xue Y, Li L, Qian S, Liu K, Zhou XJ, Li B, et al. The effects of head-cooling on brain function during passive hyperthermia: an fMRI study. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2018;34(7):1010-9.
  16. Racinais S, Gaoua N, Grantham J. Hyperthermia impairs short‐term memory and peripheral motor drive transmission. The Journal of physiology. 2008;586(19):4751-62.
  17. Gaoua N, Racinais S, Grantham J, El Massioui F. Alterations in cognitive performance during passive hyperthermia are task dependent. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2011;27(1):1-9.
  18. Walter EJ, Carraretto M. The neurological and cognitive consequences of hyperthermia. Critical Care. 2016;20:1-8.
  19. Carpenter PA, Just MA, Reichle ED. Working memory and executive function: Evidence from neuroimaging. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2000;10(2):195-9.
  20. Ozen NE, Rezaki M. Prefrontal Cortex: Implications of Memory Functions and Dementia. TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI. 2007;18(3):262.
  21. Jia X, Fan W, Wang Z, Liu Y, Li Y, Li H, et al. Progressive Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease With Probable REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2022;13:750767.
  22. Neuhaus M, Calabrese P, Annoni J-M. Decision-making in multiple sclerosis patients: a systematic review. Multiple sclerosis international. 2018;2018.
  23. Smith CJ, Xiong G, Elkind JA, Putnam B, Cohen AS. Brain injury impairs working memory and prefrontal circuit function. Frontiers in neurology. 2015;6:240.
  24. Pizzagalli DA, Roberts AC. Prefrontal cortex and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):225-46.
  25. Maas DA, Vallès A, Martens GJ. Oxidative stress, prefrontal cortex hypomyelination and cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia. Translational psychiatry. 2017;7(7):e1171-e.
  26. Lara AH, Wallis JD. The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory: a mini review. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2015;9:173.
  27. Yulug B, Velioglu HA, Sayman D, Cankaya S, Hanoglu L. Brain temperature in healthy and diseased conditions: A review on the special implications of MRS for monitoring brain temperature. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2023;160:114287.
  28. Imai E, Katagiri Y, Hosaka H, Itao K. Individual Differences in Cognitive Performance Regulated by Deep-Brain Activity during Mild Passive Hyperthermia and Neck Cooling. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science. 2016;6(08):305.
  29. Jackson K, Rubin R, Van Hoeck N, Hauert T, Lana V, Wang H. The effect of selective head-neck cooling on physiological and cognitive functions in healthy volunteers. Translational Neuroscience. 2015;1(open-issue).
  30. Bouchefra S, Azeroual A, Boudassamout H, Ahaji K, Ech-Chaouy A, Bour A. Association between Non-Verbal Intelligence and Academic Performance of Schoolchildren from Taza, Eastern Morocco. Journal of Intelligence. 2022;10(3):60.
  31. Roque DT, Teixeira RAA, Zachi EC, Ventura DF. The use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) in neuropsychological assessment: application in Brazilian research with control children and adults with neurological disorders. Psychology & Neuroscience. 2011;4(2):255-65.
  32. J. Fray P, W. Robbins T, J. Sahakian B. Neuorpsychiatyric applications of CANTAB. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 1996;11(4):329-36.
  33. Wang H, Wang B, Normoyle KP, Jackson K, Spitler K, Sharrock MF, et al. Brain temperature and its fundamental properties: a review for clinical neuroscientists. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2014;8:307.
  34. Shibasaki M, Namba M, Oshiro M, Kakigi R, Nakata H. Suppression of cognitive function in hyperthermia; From the viewpoint of executive and inhibitive cognitive processing. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):43528.
  35. Mazalan NS, Landers GJ, Wallman KE, Ecker U. A combination of ice ingestion and head cooling enhances cognitive performance during endurance exercise in the heat. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2022;21(1):23.
  36. Mohsenian S, Kouhnavard B, Nami M, Mehdizadeh A, Seif M, Zamanian Z. Effect of temperature reduction of the prefrontal area on accuracy of visual sustained attention. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2022:1-8.
  37. Story GM. The emerging role of TRP channels in mechanisms of temperature and pain sensation. Current neuropharmacology. 2006;4(3):183-96.
  38. Beauchamp MS, Beurlot MR, Fava E, Nath AR, Parikh NA, Saad ZS, et al. The developmental trajectory of brain-scalp distance from birth through childhood: implications for functional neuroimaging. PloS one. 2011;6(9):e24981.
  39. Robbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 1994;5(5):266-81.
  40. Sahakian BJ, Owen A. Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry using CANTAB: discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1992;85(7):399.
  41. Liu S, Poh JH, Koh HL, Ng KK, Loke YM, Lim JKW, et al. Carrying the past to the future: Distinct brain networks underlie individual differences in human spatial working memory capacity. NeuroImage. 2018;176:1-10.
  42. Chai WJ, Abd Hamid AI, Abdullah JM. Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: a review. Frontiers in psychology. 2018;9:401.
  43. Hahn LA, Rose J. Working memory as an indicator for comparative cognition–detecting qualitative and quantitative differences. Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:1954.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 357
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب