Usability and Quality Evaluation of the “E- Midwife” Mobile Application for Nurse- Midwives in Obstetric Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial

1.    Bangal VB, Borawake SK, Gavhane SP, Aher KH. Use of mobile phone for improvement in maternal health : a randomized control trial. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;6:5458-63. 
2.    Mathur P, Chande SV. Usability Testing Methods for Mobile Learning Applications. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Applications. 2017;5:1-9. 
3.    Laing SS, Alsayid M, Ocampo C, Baugh S. Mobile Health Technology Knowledge and Practices Among Patients of Safety-Net Health Systems in Washington State and Washington, DC. Journal of Patient-centered Research and Reviews. 2018;5:204-17 
4.    Sun Sh. Smartphone penetration rate in India from 2009 to 2023, with estimates until 2040. Germany: Statista; 2023. [Cited 20 Sep 2023]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1229799/india-smartphone-penetration-rate/
5.    Nørgaard SK, Nichum VL, Barfred C, et al. Use of the smartphone application “Pregnant with Diabetes”. Danish Medical Journal. 2017;64:A5417. 
6.    Braüner Klokkenga CM, Enemark U, Adanu R, et al. The effect of smartphone training of Ghanaian midwives by the Safe Delivery application on the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage : A cluster randomised controlled trial. Cogent Medicine. 2019;6:1632016.
7.    Shorey S, Lau YY, Dennis CL, et al. A randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of the ‘Home-but not Alone’ mobile health application educational programme on parental outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017;73:2103-17. 
8.    Skar JB, Garnweidner-Holme LM, Lukasse M, Terragni L. Women’s experiences with using a smartphone app (the Pregnant+ app) to manage gestational diabetes mellitus in a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2018;58:102-8. 
9.    Zhang C, Ran L, Chai Z, et al. The design, development and usability testing of a smartphone-based mobile system for management of children’s oral health. Health Informatics Journal. 2022;28:14604582221113432. 
10.    Costa Souza FML, Dos Santos WN, da Costa Santos RS, et al. Effectiveness of mobile applications in pregnant women ’ s adherence to prenatal consultations : randomized clinical trial. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74:e20190599. 
11.    Mramba BP, Kaijage SF. Design of an interacive mobile application for maternal, neonatal and Infant care support for Tanzania. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. 2018;11:569-84. 
12.    Matthews S, Atkins B, Walton N, et al. Development and Use of a Cardiac Clinical Guideline Mobile App in Australia : Acceptability and Multi-Methods Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6:e35599. 
13.    Alturki R, Gay V. Usability Attributes for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review. In: Jan M, Khan F, Alam M, eds. Recent Trends and Advances in Wireless and IoT-enabled Networks. Switzerland: Springer, Cham; 2019. p. 53-62. 
14.    Borgen I, Småstuen MC, Jacobsen AF, et al. Effect of the Pregnant+ smartphone application in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomised controlled trial in Norway. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030884. 
15.    World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
16.    Tuyishime E, Park PH, Rouleau D, et al. Implementing the World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist in a district Hospital in Rwanda: a pre- and post-intervention study. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology. 2018;4:7. 
17.    Yusoff MSB. ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11:49-54.
18.    Jackson J, Leziak K, Niznik CM, Yee LM. Health Care Providers’ Utilization of and Perspectives on Mobile Health Technology for Diabetes and Pregnancy Support. Diabetes Spectrum. 2021;34:257-67. 
19.    Internet World Stats. World Internet Users and Population Statistics. US: Miniwatts Marketing Group; 2023. [Cited 21 Sep 2023]. Available from: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
20.    Seyyedi N, Rahmatnezhad L, Mesgarzadeh M, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone-based educational intervention to improve breastfeeding. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2021;16:70. 
21.    Benski AC, Stancanelli G, Scaringella S, et al. Usability and feasibility of a mobile health system to provide comprehensive antenatal care in low-income countries : PANDA mHealth pilot study in Madagascar. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;23:536-43. 
22.    Gilbert S, Mehl A, Baluch A, et al. How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040269. 
23.    Behboudi F, Pouralizadeh M, Yeganeh MR, Khoshrang H. Designing and evaluating an educational mobile application for prevention of foreign body aspiration and measure to open airways of children. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2021;15:100313. 
24.    Lacroze E, Frühauf A, Nordmann K, et al. Usability and acceptance of a mobile health wallet for pregnancy-related healthcare: A mixed methods study on stakeholders’ perceptions in central Madagascar. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0279880. 
25.    Vuong AM, Huber JC, Bolin JN, et al. Factors affecting acceptability and usability of technological approaches to diabetes self-management: A case study. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2012;14:1178-82. 
26.    Muhamat NA, Hasan R, Saddki N, et al. Development and usability testing of mobile application on diet and oral health. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0257035. 
27.    Cho H, Yen PY, Dowding D, et al. A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2018;86:79-89.