LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,673
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,463
Agrawal, Ishita, Katge, Farhin, Pol, Sanmati, Patil, Devendra, Chimata, Vamsi, Pradhan, Debapriya. (1403). Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 25(3), 203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006
Ishita Agrawal; Farhin Katge; Sanmati Pol; Devendra Patil; Vamsi Krishna Chimata; Debapriya Pradhan. "Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 25, 3, 1403, 203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006
Agrawal, Ishita, Katge, Farhin, Pol, Sanmati, Patil, Devendra, Chimata, Vamsi, Pradhan, Debapriya. (1403). 'Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 25(3), pp. 203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006
Agrawal, Ishita, Katge, Farhin, Pol, Sanmati, Patil, Devendra, Chimata, Vamsi, Pradhan, Debapriya. Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 25(3): 203-214. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006

Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locator and Digital Radiography for Working Length Determination in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 3، دوره 25، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 84، آذر 2024، صفحه 203-214    اصل مقاله (584.42 K)
نوع مقاله: Systematic Review
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2023.97323.2006
نویسندگان
Ishita Agrawal1؛ Farhin Katge* 2؛ Sanmati Pol3؛ Devendra Patil3؛ Vamsi Krishna Chimata4؛ Debapriya Pradhan2
1Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Sector-22, Nerul West, Navi-Mumbai, India.
2Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Sector-22, Nerul West, Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
3Lecturer, Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Sector-22, Nerul West, Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
4Reader, Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Sector-22, Nerul West, Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: It is challenging to perform a pulpectomy procedure in primary tooth because of its physiological root resorption and variation in root morphology. Working length measurement is considered to be one of the critical steps, as it determines the extent of obturation and apical seal.
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL) and digital radiography (DR) for working length determination in primary teeth.
Materials and Method: In this systematic review, electronic databases and grey literature were searched from 1st January 2005 to 1st January 2023 for randomized control trial, non- randomized control trial, in vitro studies, ex vivo studies that compared accuracy of EAL and DR in primary teeth. Two reviewers independently identified studies, retrieved data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised and validated MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria.
Results: Ten studies were included in qualitative analysis. Seven out of ten studies showed low risk of bias whereas other three studies showed high risk of bias. In view of methodological heterogeneity of the findings, a meta-analysis was not conducted.
Conclusion: Available evidence suggests a moderate quality of evidence in this systematic review. Analyzing the ten studies included in this systematic review, the majority of studies showed statistically insignificant difference between EAL and DR. However, EAL was closer to actual WL as compared to DR. Based on the evidence that is currently available; EAL can be considered as an alternative for working length measurement in primary teeth. 

تازه های تحقیق

Farhin Katge (google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Dental Radiovisiography؛ Digital Dental Radiography؛ Primary Dentitions؛ Milk Tooth
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RA, Rafini MS. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 317–321.
  • American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of endodontic terms. American Association of Endodontists; 2003. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/glossary-of-endodontic-terms/oclc/54406300
  • Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Rani ST, Rajesh A. Clinical evaluation of conventional radiography, radiovisiography, and an electronic apex locator in determining the working length in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016; 38: 37-41.
  • Wankhade AD, Kumar R, Singh RK, Chandra A. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35: 38-42.
  • Odabaş ME, Bodur H, Tulunoğlu O, Alaçam A. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator: A clinical evaluation in primary molars with and without resorption. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011; 35: 255-258.
  • Neena IE, Ananthraj A, Praveen P, Karthik V, Rani P. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011; 29: 300-304.
  • Shearer AC, Horner K, Wilson NH. Digital radiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Quint Int. 1990; 21: 789-794.
  • Ghaemmaghamis S, Eberie J, Duperon D. Evaluation of Root ZX apex locator in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2008; 30: 496–498.
  • Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: an in vivo and ex vivo Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 402-406.
  • Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372.
  • Chokkalingam A, Scherer R, Dickersin K. Agreement of data in abstracts compared to full publications. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: S61–S62.
  • Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716.
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46.
  • Shanmugaraj M, Nivedha R, Mathan R, Balagopal S. Evaluation of working length determination methods: an in vivo/ ex vivo Indian J Dent Res. 2007; 18: 60-62.
  • Krajczár K, Marada G, Gyulai G, Tóth V. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106: e90-e93.
  • Krajczár K, Soltész MZ, Gyulai G, Marada G, Szabó G, Tóth V. ProPex apexlokátorral és radiológiai módszerrel végzett munkahossz-meghatározás összehasonlítása in vitro direkt eljárással [Direct comparison of working length determination by ProPex electronic apex locator and radiographic method--an in vitro study]. Fogorv Sz. 2008; 101: 107-111.
  • Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1753-1756.
  • Cianconi L, Angotti V, Felici R, Conte G, Mancini M. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: an ex vivo J Endod. 2010; 36: 2003-2007.
  • Real DG, Davidowicz H, Moura-Netto C, Zenkner Cde L, Pagliarin CM, Barletta FB, de Moura AA. Accuracy of working length determination using 3 electronic apex locators and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111: e44-e49.
  • Parekh V, Taluja C. Comparative study of periapical radiographic techniques with apex locator for endodontic working length estimation: an ex vivo J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011; 12: 131-134.
  • Vieyra JP, Acosta J, Mondaca JM. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 16-20.
  • Vieyra JP, Acosta J. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 510-518.
  • Saritha S, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Chandra Sekhar R, Rao VV. Clinical evaluation of Root ZX II electronic apex locator in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012; 13: 32-35.
  • Singh SV, Nikhil V, Singh AV, Yadav S. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators. Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23: 359-362.
  • Kishor KM. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012; 13: 550-553.
  • Mandlik J, Shah N, Pawar K, Gupta P, Singh S, Shaik SA. An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14: 644-648.
  • Oznurhan F, Ünal M, Kapdan A, Ozturk C, Aksoy S. Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015; 25: 199-203.
  • Basso MD, Jeremias F, Cordeiro RC, Santos-Pinto L. Digital radiography for determination of primary tooth length: in vivo and ex vivo Sci World J. 2015; 2015; 939045.
  • Singh D, Tyagi SP, Gupta S, Jain A. Comparative evaluation of adequacy of final working length after using Raypex5 or radiography: an in vivo J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015; 33: 208-212.
  • Carneiro JA, de Carvalho FM, Marques AA, Junior EC, Garcia LD, Goncalves LC. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator and manual method - ex vivo Dent Med Res. 2016; 4: 39-43.
  • Dutta K, Desai PD, Das UK, Sarkar S. Comparative evaluation of three methods to measure working length - Manual tactile sensation, digital radiograph, and multidetector computed tomography: Anin vitro  J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20: 76-80. 
  • Khateeb SU, Kaul K, Kaul R, Jeri SY, Ahmad R. Comparative study for determination of root canal working length accuracy by different methods: an in vivo/ in vitro IP Annals Prosth Rest Dent. 2017; 3: 88-93
  • Adriano LZ, Barasuol JC, Cardoso M, Bolan M. In vitro comparison between apex locators, direct and radiographic techniques for determining the root canal length in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019; 20: 403-408.
  • Rathore K, Tandon S, Sharma M, Kalia G, Shekhawat T, Chundawat Y. Comparison of Accuracy of Apex Locator with Tactile and Conventional Radiographic Method for Working Length Determination in Primary and Permanent Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020; 13: 235-239.
  • Davalbhakta RN, Gokhale NS, Hugar SM, Badakar CM, Gowtham A, Soneta SP. Comparative evaluation of root ZX Mini® apex locator and radiovisiography in determining the working length of primary molars: An in vivo J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021; 11: 257-262.
  • Goel T, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sardana D, Chawla M. Comparative evaluation of working length using conventional radiographic method, radiovisiography, and apex locator in single-rooted permanent teeth. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2021; 15: 49–54.
  • Mousavi SA, Zahedinejad A, Kowsari B, Kolahdouzan E, Mousavi SI, Saeidian S. Comparative evaluation of root canal working length determination with three methods: conventional radiography, digital radiography and raypex6 apex locator: an experimental study.J Dent Mater Techniq. 2021; 10: 87-93. 
  • Singh AK, Rathod A, Reddy A, Moyin S, Punathil S, Shah A. Evaluation of the efficacy of different systems in determination of root canal working length: A comparative study. World J Dent. 2021; 12: 399–402.
  • Ramezani M, Bolbolian M, Aliakbari M, Alizadeh A, Tofangchiha M, Faegh SM, et al. Accuracy of three types of apex locators versus digital periapical radiography for working length determination in maxillary premolars: An in vitro Clin Pract. 2022; 12: 1043-1053.
  • Cardoso ML, Lugo de Langhe CD, Diaz NG. In vitro determination of working length in primary teeth. Univ Odontol. Available at: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/files-articulos/UO/41(2022)/231273734003/index.html
  • Shibin J, Gs P, M S, S N, Adimoulame S, M K. Evaluation of the working length determination accuracy by cone-beam computed tomography in primary teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022; 15(Suppl 1): S92-S96.
  • Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005; 23: 124–125.
  • Sherif B. El Tawil. An in vitro comparison of root canal Length measurements of primary teeth using different techniques. J Am Sci. 2012; 8: 541-547.
  • Sahni A, Kapoor R, Gandhi K, Kumar D, Datta G, Malhotra R. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of electronic apex locator, digital radiography, and conventional radiographic method for root canal working length determination in primary teeth: An in vitro Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020; 13: 523-528.
  • Kayabasi M, Oznurhan F. Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone-beam computed tomography, and digital radiography in primary teeth: An in vitro Microsc Res Tech. 2020; 83: 1330-1335.
  • Pol SD, Katge FA, Poojari MS, Shetty SK, Patil DP. Accuracy of working length determination using three different methods: An in vitro Nair hospital dental college J Contemp Dent.2021; 1: 3-8.
  • Mello-Moura AC, Moura Netto C, Araki AT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Mendes FM. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 142-147.
  • Khan SA, Khanna R, Navit S, Jabeen S, Grover N, Pramanik S. Comparison of Radiovisiography, an Apex Locator and an Integrated Endomotor-inbuilt Apex Locator in Primary Teeth Endometrics. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022; 15(Suppl 1): S18-S21.
  • American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Reference manual 2009-2010. Pediatr Dent. 2009; 33: 212-219.
  • Hassanien E, Hashem A, Chalfin H. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: an attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiographic methods to various positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod. 2008; 34: 408–412.
  • Hör D, Krusy S, Attin T. Ex vivo comparison of two electronic apex locators with different scales and frequencies. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 855-859.
  • Haffner C, Folwaczny M, Galler K, Hickel R. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length an in vivo J Dent. 2005; 33: 619–25.
  • Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993; 15: 403-407.
  • Loushine RJ, Weller N, Kimbrough WF, Potter BJ. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images. J Endod. 2001; 27: 779-781.
  • Kim-Park MA, Baughan IW, Hartwell GR. Working length determination in palatal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod. 2003; 29: 58-61.
  • Nasiri K, Wrbas KT. Accuracy of different generations of apex locators in determining working length; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2022; 34: 11-20.
  • Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and tomography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J. 1984; 17: 192-198.
  • Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, et al. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 94–100.
  • Berman LH, Fleischman SB. Evaluation of the accuracy of the Neosono-D electronic apex locator. J Endod 1984; 10: 164-167.
  • Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review. Pediatr Dent. 1983; 5: 33-37.
  • Shabahang S, Goon WWY, Gluskin AH. An in vivo evaluation of root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod. 1996; 22: 616–618.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,018
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 482


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب