LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,083
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,752
Hamilton, Emma, McLaughlin, Karen, Mollart, Lyndall. (1402). Factors that Influence Women’s Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), 152-168. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97229.2171
Emma L Hamilton; Karen McLaughlin; Lyndall Mollart. "Factors that Influence Women’s Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 3, 1402, 152-168. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97229.2171
Hamilton, Emma, McLaughlin, Karen, Mollart, Lyndall. (1402). 'Factors that Influence Women’s Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(3), pp. 152-168. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97229.2171
Hamilton, Emma, McLaughlin, Karen, Mollart, Lyndall. Factors that Influence Women’s Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(3): 152-168. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97229.2171

Factors that Influence Women’s Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section: A Meta-ethnography

International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery
مقاله 1، دوره 11، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 43، مهر 2023، صفحه 152-168    اصل مقاله (505.7 K)
نوع مقاله: Review article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97229.2171
نویسندگان
Emma L Hamilton* 1؛ Karen McLaughlin2؛ Lyndall Mollart2
1BMid (hons), School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
2The College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Nursing and Midwifery (SONM) University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
چکیده
Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are continuing to rise worldwide. Elective repeat CS (ERCS) greatly contribute to the rising rate which increases unnecessary risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women; however, uptake remains low. Our objective is to find the factors that influence women’s decision-making to support informed choices for the mode of next birth after caesarean section (NBAC).
Methods: A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, Embase, EmCare, Cochrane Library and Medline databases. Primary, qualitative, peer reviewed, English language research articles were assessed according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were systematically assessed for inclusion or exclusion. Included studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative studies checklist, Noblit and Hare’s seven-step meta-ethnography approach synthesised themes.
Results: Fourteen primary research articles were included. Six studies on 287 women focused on VBAC, and eight studies examined both VBAC and ERCS with 1861 women and 311 blogs. Thematic analysis yielded four primary themes: Influence of health professionals, impact of previous birth experience, optimal experience, and being in control.
Conclusion: This meta-ethnography highlights health professionals’ influence on women’s decision making. To assist in decision-making, women need supportive health professionals who provide the current evidence-informed information about risks and benefits of each mode of birth. Health professionals need skills to provide supportive shared decision-making, debrief women regarding indications for their primary caesarean, and address issues of safety, fear, and expectations of childbirth.

تازه های تحقیق

Emma L Hamilton (Google Scholar) (PubMed)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Obstetric labour complications؛ Health personnel؛ Midwifery؛ Qualitative research
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. World Health Organisation. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2015.
  2. Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2018;15:e1002494.
  3. Caughey AB. The cesarean epidemic: Are we too quick to cut? Contemporary Ob/Gyn. 2016;61:14-8.
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;133:e110-27.
  5. Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Hirsch A, et al. The use of absorbable adhesion barriers to reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020;302:101-8.
  6. Dunning T, Martin H, McGrath Y. Vaginal birth after caesarean: how NICE guidelines can inform midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery. 2019;27:689-93.
  7. Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Grace Dahlen H. The journey from pain to power: A meta-ethnography on women’s experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean. Women and Birth. 2018;31:69-79.
  8. Sattar R, Lawton R, Panagioti M, Johnson J. Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21:50.
  9. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Counterpoints, JSTOR. 1999;44:93-123.
  10. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP (Qualitative Studies Checklist). UK: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; 2018. [Cited 22 April 2023]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
  11. Akgun M, Boz I. Women’s decision-making processes and experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean birth: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2019;25:e12780.
  12. Attanasio LB, Kozhimannil KB, Kjerulff KH. Women’s preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. Birth. 2019;46:51-60.
  13. Basile Ibrahim B, Knobf MT, Shorten A, et al. “I had to fight for my VBAC”: A mixed methods exploration of women’s experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States. Birth. 2021;48:164-77.
  14. Chan MH, Hauck Y, Kuliukas L, Lewis L. Women’s experiences of their involvement around care decisions during a subsequent pregnancy after a previous caesarean birth in Western Australia. Women and Birth. 2021;34:e442-50.
  15. Chen MM, McKellar L, Pincombe J. Influences on vaginal birth after caesarean section: A qualitative study of Taiwanese women. Women and Birth. 2017;30:e132-9.
  16. Chen SW, Hutchinson AM, Nagle C, Bucknall TK. Women’s decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018;18:31.
  17. Dahlen HG, Homer CSE. ‘Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery. 2013;29:167-73.
  18. Davis DS, Homer C, Clack D, et al. Choosing vaginal birth after caesarean section: Motivating factors. Midwifery. 2020;88:102766.
  19. Konheim-Kalkstein YL, Kirk CP, Berish K, Galotti KM. Owning the birth experience: what factors influence women’s vaginal birth after caesarean decision? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2017;35:410-22.
  20. McGrath P, Phillips E, Vaughan G. Vaginal birth after Caesarean risk decision-making: Australian findings on the mothers’ perspective. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2010;16:274-81.
  21. Munro S, Janssen P, Corbett K, et al. Seeking control in the midst of uncertainty: Women’s experiences of choosing mode of birth after caesarean. Women and Birth. 2017;30:129-36.
  22. Nilsson C, Lalor J, Begley C, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women and Birth. 2017;30:481-90.
  23. Nilsson C, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lundgren I. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Views of Women From Countries With High VBAC Rates. Qualitative Health Research. 2017;27:325-40.
  24. Simeone S, Stile F, Assunta G, et al. Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Perinatal Education. 2019;28:131-41.
  25. Benton M, Salter A, Tape N, et al. Women’s psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19:535.
  26. Storksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013;92:318-24.
  27. Weaver J, Browne J, Aras-Payne A, Magill-Cuerden J. A comprehensive systematic review of the impact of planned interventions offered to pregnant women who have requested a caesarean section as a result of tokophobia (fear of childbirth). JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2013;11:70-122.
  28. Kelly MP, Barker M. Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public Health. 2016;136:109-16.
  29. Watson K, White C, Hall H, Hewitt A. Women’s experiences of birth trauma: A scoping review. Women and Birth. 2021;34:417-24.
  30. Edwards A, Trevena L. What you need to know as a clinician about risk communication. In: Elwyn G, Edwards A, Thompson R, editors. Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Achieving evidence-based patient choice. 3rd ed. UK: Oxford University Press; 2016.
  31. Atchan M, Foureur M, Davis D. The decision not to initiate breastfeeding - women’s reasons, attitudes and influencing factors - a review of the literature. Breastfeeding Review. 2011;19:9-17.
  32. Jonas K, Kalichman M, Kalichman S, et al. Factors affecting men’s support for the use of the contraceptive implant by their female intimate partners. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 2020;5:36.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,225
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,786


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب