LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,861
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,525
Yahaghi, Effat. (1403). Estimation of Tissue Permeability in MRI Images by Empirical Mode Decomposition Method. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(5), 469-476. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2203-1472
Effat Yahaghi. "Estimation of Tissue Permeability in MRI Images by Empirical Mode Decomposition Method". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 5, 1403, 469-476. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2203-1472
Yahaghi, Effat. (1403). 'Estimation of Tissue Permeability in MRI Images by Empirical Mode Decomposition Method', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(5), pp. 469-476. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2203-1472
Yahaghi, Effat. Estimation of Tissue Permeability in MRI Images by Empirical Mode Decomposition Method. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 14(5): 469-476. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2203-1472

Estimation of Tissue Permeability in MRI Images by Empirical Mode Decomposition Method

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 14، شماره 5، دی 2024، صفحه 469-476    اصل مقاله (1.74 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2203-1472
نویسنده
Effat Yahaghi*
Department of Physics, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده
Background: The precise evaluation of tissue permeability using the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) method requires high-quality images. Due to noisy acquired dynamic MRI images, some methods of processing are required to obtain the imaging detail of interest.
Objective: This study aimed to implement Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) to the Lock-Locker (LL) images to improve the permeability of the normal tissue and tumor region, evaluated by the Quantitative Autoradiography (QAR) method.
Material and Methods: In this experimental and analytical study, the EMD method was used to improve the tissue permeability from the LL- MRI images of the rat brain. The EMD components were extracted from LL images, and the resulting components were combined using different weighting factors. The tissue permeability was derived by extracting the information of each pixel from the LL image series and fitting curves to the data.
Results: The optimum weighted combination factors images were 0.7 for the middle and low-frequency components and 1 for the high-frequency component. The calculated tissue permeability was between 0.0023-0.0043 (ml.min-1.g-1) for abnormal tissue. 
Conclusion: The estimation of the permeability of tumors in the rat brain with the LL images and the processed LL images by the EMD method shows that the EMD method and the weighted combination of frequency components can improve the permeability calculation in the LL images for the rat brain. The results of permeability estimation by EMD due to noise reduction of LL images are closer to the values obtained from the Quantitative Autoradiography (QAR).

تازه های تحقیق

Effat Yahaghi (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Blood-Brain Barrier؛ Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)؛ Contrast Media؛ Tissue Permeability؛ Lock-Locker (LL) Method؛ Magnetic Resonance Imaging
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(3):735-45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22861. PubMed PMID: 21384424.
  2. Varatharaj A, Liljeroth M, Darekar A, Larsson HBW, Galea I, Cramer SP. Blood-brain barrier permeability measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a validation study. J Physiol. 2019;597(3):699-709. doi: 10.1113/JP276887. PubMed PMID: 30417928. PubMed PMCID: PMC6355631.
  3. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17(2):357-67. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910170208. PubMed PMID: 2062210.
  4. Ha IH, Lim C, Kim Y, Moon Y, Han SH, Moon WJ. Regional Differences in Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Cognitively Normal Elderly Subjects: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Based Study. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22(7):1152-62. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0816. PubMed PMID: 33739632. PubMed PMCID: PMC8236362.
  5. Chen BT, Jin T, Ye N, Mambetsariev I, Daniel E, Wang T, et al. Radiomic prediction of mutation status based on MR imaging of lung cancer brain metastases. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;69:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.03.002. PubMed PMID: 32179095. PubMed PMCID: PMC7237274.
  6. Yahaghi E, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Shahriari M, Fatouraee N, Ewing JR. Estimation of contrast agent concentration in intra- and extra-vascular spaces of brain tissue. Math Biosci. 2006;204(1):102-18. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.07.002. PubMed PMID: 16978665.
  7. Look DC, Locker DR. Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1970;41(2):250-1. doi: 10.1063/1.1684482.
  8. Henderson E, McKinnon G, Lee TY, Rutt BK. A fast 3D look-locker method for volumetric T1 mapping. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17(8):1163-71. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00025-9. PubMed PMID: 10499678.
  9. Linderhed A. Image empirical mode decomposition: A new tool for image processing. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis. 2009;1(2):265-94. doi: 10.1142/S1793536909000138.
  10. Linderhed A. Compression by image empirical mode decomposition. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; Genova, Italy: IEEE; 2005.
  11. Cicone A. Nonstationary signal decomposition for dummies. In: Singh VK, Gao D, Fischer A, editors. Advances in Mathematical Methods and High-Performance Computing. New York: Springer; 2019. p. 69-82.
  12. Stallone A, Cicone A, Materassi M. New insights and best practices for the successful use of Empirical Mode Decomposition, Iterative Filtering and derived algorithms. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72193-2. PubMed PMID: 32939024. PubMed PMCID: PMC7495475.
  13. Paudyal R, Ewing JR, Nagaraja TN, Bagher-Ebadian H, Knight RA, Panda S, et al. The concordance of MRI and quantitative autoradiography estimates of the transvascular transfer rate constant of albumin in a rat brain tumor model. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(5):1422-31. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22914. PubMed PMID: 21630343. PubMed PMCID: PMC3166445.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 161,983
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 327


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب