LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,415,989
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,641
Momeni, Nastaran, Broomand, Mohammad Ali, Roozmand, Zahra, Hamzian, Nima. (1402). Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(5), 411-420. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554
Nastaran Momeni; Mohammad Ali Broomand; Zahra Roozmand; Nima Hamzian. "Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 5, 1402, 411-420. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554
Momeni, Nastaran, Broomand, Mohammad Ali, Roozmand, Zahra, Hamzian, Nima. (1402). 'Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(5), pp. 411-420. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554
Momeni, Nastaran, Broomand, Mohammad Ali, Roozmand, Zahra, Hamzian, Nima. Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(5): 411-420. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554

Estimating the Dose-Response Relationship for Ocular Pain after Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancers and Skull Base Tumors based on the LKB Radiobiological Model

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 13، شماره 5، دی 2023، صفحه 411-420    اصل مقاله (1.07 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1554
نویسندگان
Nastaran Momeni1؛ Mohammad Ali Broomand2؛ Zahra Roozmand1؛ Nima Hamzian* 1
1Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2Department of Clinical Oncology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
چکیده
Background: Radiotherapy is considered a compromise between the amount of killed tumor cells and the damage caused to the healthy tissue. Regarding this, radiobiological modeling is performed to individualize and optimize treatment strategies.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of acute ocular pain following radiotherapy.
Material and Methods: In this prospective observational study, the clinical data were collected from 45 patients with head and neck cancers and skull-base tumors, and dosimetric data were recorded after contouring the eye globe. Acute ocular pain was prospectively assessed with a three-month follow-up. The Lyman-Kutcher-Berman (LKB) parameters were estimated using the Area Under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) maximization and Maximum Likelihood (MLH) methods, and the NTCP of acute ocular pain was then determined using generalized LKB radiobiological model. The model performance was evaluated with AUC, Brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests.
Results: Six out of 45 (13.33%) patients developed acute ocular pain (grade 1 or more). LKB model showed a weak dose-volume effect (n=0.09), tolerance dose for a 50% complication (TD50) of 27.54 Gy, and slope parameter (m) of 0.38. The LKB model showed high prediction performance. The LKB model predicted that NTCP would be less than 25% if the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) was kept below 20 Gy. 
Conclusion: The LKB model showed a high performance in determining the NTCP of ocular pain so that the probability of ocular pain will be less than 25% if the eye globe mean dose is kept below 12 Gy.

تازه های تحقیق

Nastaran Momeni (Google Scholar)

Nima Hamzian (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Normal Tissue Complication Probability؛ Dose-Response؛ Radiotherapy؛ Lyman-Kutcher-Burman؛ Ocular Pain
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Boyer AL, Yu CX. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with dynamic multileaf collimators (MLC). Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999;9(1):48-59. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(99)80054-X. PubMed PMID: 10196398.
  2. Cardoso CC, Giordani AJ, Wolosker AM, Souhami L, Manso PG, Dias RS, et al. Protracted hypofractionated radiotherapy for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: a pilot study of clinical and radiologic response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(3):1285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.015. PubMed PMID: 21550180.
  3. Jeganathan VS, Wirth A, MacManus MP. Ocular risks from orbital and periorbital radiation therapy: a critical review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(3):650-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.056. PubMed PMID: 21281895.
  4. Bhandare N, Moiseenko V, Song WY, Morris CG, Bhatti MT, Mendenhall WM. Severe dry eye syndrome after radiotherapy for head-and-neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(4):1501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.026. PubMed PMID: 21764525.
  5. Beasley M, Driver D, Dobbs HJ. Complications of radiotherapy: improving the therapeutic index. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5(1):78-84. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0012. PubMed PMID: 16154824. PubMed PMCID: PMC1665228.
  6. Faiz MKh, John PG, Paul WS. Khan’s Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2021.
  7. Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee DE, Altman DG. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ. 2009;23;338:b375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b375. PubMed PMID: 19237405.
  8. Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y. Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. 2009;338:b604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b604. PubMed PMID: 19336487.
  9. Van Den Bosch L, Schuit E, Van Der Laan HP, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM, Steenbakkers RJHM, et al. Key challenges in normal tissue complication probability model development and validation: towards a comprehensive strategy. Radiother Oncol. 2020;148:151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.012. PubMed PMID: 32388149.
  10. Niemierko A, Goitein M. Calculation of normal tissue complication probability and dose-volume histogram reduction schemes for tissues with a critical element architecture. Radiother Oncol. 1991;20(3):166-76. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(91)90093-v. PubMed PMID: 1852908.
  11. Semenenko VA, Li XA. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model parameters for radiation pneumonitis and xerostomia based on combined analysis of published clinical data. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(3):737-55. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/014. PubMed PMID: 18199912.
  12. Dutz A, Lühr A, Agolli L, Troost EGC, Krause M, Baumann M, et al. Development and validation of NTCP models for acute side-effects resulting from proton beam therapy of brain tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2019;130:164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.036. PubMed PMID: 30033385.
  13. Wu YL, Li WF, Yang KB, Chen L, Shi JR, Chen FP, et al. Long-Term Evaluation and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Models for Predicting Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy after Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Study in China. J Oncol. 2022;2022:3647462. doi: 10.1155/2022/3647462. PubMed PMID: 35251172. PubMed PMCID: PMC8890878.
  14. Gordon KB, Char DH, Sagerman RH. Late effects of radiation on the eye and ocular adnexa. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1123-39. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00062-4. PubMed PMID: 7713778.
  15. Mosleh-Shirazi MA, Amraee A, Mohaghegh F. Dose-response relationship and normal-tissue complication probability of conductive hearing loss in patients undergoing head-and-neck or cranial radiotherapy: A prospective study including 70 ears. Phys Med. 2019;61:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.003. PubMed PMID: 31151581.
  16. Chen AP, Setser A, Anadkat MJ, Cotliar J, Olsen EA, Garden BC, Lacouture ME. Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(5):1025-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.010. PubMed PMID: 22502948.
  17. De Marzi L, Feuvret L, Boulé T, Habrand JL, Martin F, Calugaru V, et al. Use of gEUD for predicting ear and pituitary gland damage following proton and photon radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1048):20140413. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140413. PubMed PMID: 25671247. PubMed PMCID: PMC4651261.
  18. Boulé TP, Gallardo Fuentes MI, Roselló JV, Arrans Lara R, Torrecilla JL, Plaza AL. Clinical comparative study of dose-volume and equivalent uniform dose based predictions in post radiotherapy acute complications. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(7):1044-53. doi: 10.1080/02841860903078513. PubMed PMID: 19575313.
  19. Cella L, D’Avino V, Palma G, Conson M, Liuzzi R, Picardi M, et al. Modeling the risk of radiation-induced lung fibrosis: Irradiated heart tissue is as important as irradiated lung. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.051. PubMed PMID: 26277435.
  20. Palma G, Taffelli A, Fellin F, D’Avino V, Scartoni D, Tommasino F, et al. Modelling the risk of radiation induced alopecia in brain tumor patients treated with scanned proton beams. Radiother Oncol. 2020;144:127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.013 PubMed PMID: 31805517.
  21. Venzon DJ, Moolgavkar SH. A method for computing profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics). 1988;37(1):87-94. doi: 10.2307/2347496.
  22. Niemierko A. A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). Med Phys. 1999;26(6):1100.
  23. Fowler JF. Brief summary of radiobiological principles in fractionated radiotherapy. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 1992;2(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(05)80045-1.
  24. Fowler JF. Sensitivity analysis of parameters in linear-quadratic radiobiologic modeling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(5):1532-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.039. PubMed PMID: 19306749.
  25. Hu B, Palta M, Shao J. Properties of R(2) statistics for logistic regression. Stat Med. 2006;25(8):1383-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.2300. PubMed PMID: 16059870.
  26. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(9):882-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh101. PubMed PMID: 15105181.
  27. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies. 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics; 2017.
  28. Su TS, Luo R, Liang P, Cheng T, Zhou Y, Huang Y. A prospective cohort study of hepatic toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.031. PubMed PMID: 29548558.
  29. Claus F, Boterberg T, Ost P, De Neve W. Short term toxicity profile for 32 sinonasal cancer patients treated with IMRT. Can we avoid dry eye syndrome? Radiother Oncol. 2002;64(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00172-x. PubMed PMID: 12242131.
  30. Mavroidis P, Pearlstein KA, Moon DH, Xu V, Royce TJ, Weiner AA, et al. NTCP modeling and dose-volume correlations for acute xerostomia and dry eye after whole brain radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01786-6. PubMed PMID: 33743773. PubMed PMCID: PMC7981795.
  31. Köthe A, Van Luijk P, Safai S, Kountouri M, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Fattori G. Combining Clinical and Dosimetric Features in a PBS Proton Therapy Cohort to Develop a NTCP Model for Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;110(2):587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.052. PubMed PMID: 33421557.
  32. Källman P, Agren A, Brahme A. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;62(2):249-62. doi: 10.1080/09553009214552071. PubMed PMID: 1355519.
  33. Burman C, Kutcher GJ, Emami B, Goitein M. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z. PubMed PMID: 2032883.
  34. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):109-22. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y. PubMed PMID: 2032882.
  35. Mayo C, Martel MK, Marks LB, Flickinger J, Nam J, Kirkpatrick J. Radiation dose-volume effects of optic nerves and chiasm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1753. PubMed PMID: 20171514.
  36. Bradley JD, Hope A, El Naqa I, Apte A, Lindsay PE, Bosch W, et al. A nomogram to predict radiation pneumonitis, derived from a combined analysis of RTOG 9311 and institutional data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(4):985-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.077. PubMed PMID: 17689035. PubMed PMCID: PMC2196217.
  37. Tsougos I, Nilsson P, Theodorou K, Kjellén E, Ewers SB, Jarlman O, et al. NTCP modelling and pulmonary function tests evaluation for the prediction of radiation induced pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(4):1055-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/013. PubMed PMID: 17264370.
  38. Yorke ED, Jackson A, Rosenzweig KE, Braban L, Leibel SA, Ling CC. Correlation of dosimetric factors and radiation pneumonitis for non-small-cell lung cancer patients in a recently completed dose escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(3):672-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.026. PubMed PMID: 15939548.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 20,435
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 353


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب