LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,091
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,771
Delavari, Somayeh, Pourahmadi, Mohammadreza, Barzkar, Farzaneh. (1402). What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(3), 229-231. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.98401.3038
Somayeh Delavari; Mohammadreza Pourahmadi; Farzaneh Barzkar. "What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48, 3, 1402, 229-231. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.98401.3038
Delavari, Somayeh, Pourahmadi, Mohammadreza, Barzkar, Farzaneh. (1402). 'What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(3), pp. 229-231. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.98401.3038
Delavari, Somayeh, Pourahmadi, Mohammadreza, Barzkar, Farzaneh. What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 48(3): 229-231. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.98401.3038

What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
مقاله 1، دوره 48، شماره 3، مرداد 2023، صفحه 229-231    اصل مقاله (126.4 K)
نوع مقاله: Editorial
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijms.2023.98401.3038
نویسندگان
Somayeh Delavari1؛ Mohammadreza Pourahmadi2؛ Farzaneh Barzkar* 1
1Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
The rapid growth in medical research has popularized systematic reviews as comprehensive, accurate, reliable, and concise summaries of the best available information on a particular topic.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Systematic review؛ Quality appraisal؛ Quality of reporting؛ Risk of bias؛ Rating the certainty of evidence
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Lasserson TJ, Thomas J, Higgins JP. Starting a review. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019:1-12. doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.ch1.
  2. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42. PubMed PMID: 11440947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1120670.
  3. Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Hooton N, Krebs Seida J, et al. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4012. PubMed PMID: 19841007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2764034.
  4. Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan SS, Doi SA. Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;129:172-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044. PubMed PMID: 33422267.
  5. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.
  6. Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020. 
  7. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M, Editorial Board CBRG. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f. PubMed PMID: 19680101.
  8. Murad MH, Mustafa RA, Schunemann HJ, Sultan S, Santesso N. Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. Evid Based Med. 2017;22:85-7. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668. PubMed PMID: 28320705; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5502230.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,896
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,860


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب