LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,152
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,871
Armanmehr, Vajihe, Banafshe, Elahe, Hashemizadeh, Haydeh, Alami, Ali, Khajavi, Abdoljavad. (1402). Midwives’ Perception Regarding Conditions Influencing the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program in Iran: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), 135-148. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97165.2169
Vajihe Armanmehr; Elahe Banafshe; Haydeh Hashemizadeh; Ali Alami; Abdoljavad Khajavi. "Midwives’ Perception Regarding Conditions Influencing the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program in Iran: A Qualitative Study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 2, 1402, 135-148. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97165.2169
Armanmehr, Vajihe, Banafshe, Elahe, Hashemizadeh, Haydeh, Alami, Ali, Khajavi, Abdoljavad. (1402). 'Midwives’ Perception Regarding Conditions Influencing the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program in Iran: A Qualitative Study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), pp. 135-148. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97165.2169
Armanmehr, Vajihe, Banafshe, Elahe, Hashemizadeh, Haydeh, Alami, Ali, Khajavi, Abdoljavad. Midwives’ Perception Regarding Conditions Influencing the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program in Iran: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(2): 135-148. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97165.2169

Midwives’ Perception Regarding Conditions Influencing the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program in Iran: A Qualitative Study

International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery
مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 42، تیر 2023، صفحه 135-148    اصل مقاله (396.1 K)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97165.2169
نویسندگان
Vajihe Armanmehr1؛ Elahe Banafshe2؛ Haydeh Hashemizadeh3؛ Ali Alami4؛ Abdoljavad Khajavi* 4
1Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Science, Gonabad, Iran;
2Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran;
3Department of Nursing, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran;
4Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
چکیده
Background: In Iran, the Natural Childbirth Promotion Program (NCPP) has been implemented as a component of the Health Transformation Plan (HTP) since 2014 and as an attempt to encourage natural childbirth practices and reduce cesarean section rates. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the perceptions of midwives about conditions influencing the implementation of NCPP.
Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected through 21 in-depth semi-structured individual interviews with expert midwives who were selected using purposive sampling mainly from one medical university in Eastern Iran from October 2019 to February 2020. Based on the framework method as a thematic analysis approach, the data were analyzed manually. To enhance the rigor of the study, we followed Lincoln and Guba’s criteria.
Results: Data analysis yielded 546 open codes. After the codes were reviewed and similar codes were removed, there remained 195 codes. Further analysis led to extraction of 81 sub-sub themes, 19 sub-themes, and eight main themes. These themes included: Responsive staff; Characteristics of the parturient; Recognition of midwifery role; Teamwork; The birthing environment; Effective management; Institutional and social context; and Social education.
Conclusion: Based on the perceptions of the studied midwives, the success of the NCPP is guaranteed by a set of conditions identified in this study. In practice, these conditions are complementary and interrelated, and they cover a wide range of staff and parturient characteristics to the social context. It seems that effective implementation of the NCPP also calls for the accountability of all stakeholders, from policymakers to maternity care providers.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Health plan implementation؛ Iran؛ Midwifery؛ Natural childbirth؛ Qualitative research
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
 

  1. Hoffmann L, Banse R. Psychological aspects of childbirth: Evidence for a birth‐related mindset. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2021;51:124-51.
  2. Wójtowicz-Wcisło M. The Shift in the Childbirth Paradigm in Latin America and its Socio-Political Implications. Ameryka Łacińska. 2021;3-4:59-74.
  3. Toohill J, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, et al. Factors influencing midwives’ use of an evidenced based Normal Birth Guideline. Women and Birth. 2017;30:415-23.
  4. Dahlberg U, Persen J, Skogås AK, et al. How can midwives promote a normal birth and a positive birth experience? The experience of first-time Norwegian mothers. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2016;7:2-7.
  5. He J, Wan L, Luo B. Intentions and influencing factors regarding natural childbirth among urban pregnant women in China, based on the theory of reasoned action and structural equation modeling. Journal of International Medical Research. 2019;47:4482-91.
  6. Mosadeghrad AM, Tajvar M, Janbabai G, et al. Effect of Iran’s normal delivery promotion plan on the cesarean delivery rates: An interrupted time series study. Hayat. 2020;26:144-62. [In Persian]
  7. Chen H, Tan D. Cesarean section or natural childbirth? cesarean birth may damage your health. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:351.
  8. McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, et al. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65-79.
  9. Sakala C, Yang YT, Corry MP. Maternity care and liability: pressing problems, substantive solutions. Women’s Health Issues. 2013;23:e7-13.
  10. Babaei F, Aghajani M, Estambolichi L, et al. Study of the promotion of normal delivery program in government hospitals in line with the health transformation plan and its achievements. Hakim Research Journal. 2017;20:44-53. [In Persian]
  11. Jabbari A, Yarmohamadian MH, Hadian M. Iran’s struggling health system: an increase in natural childbirth: a case study. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2018;9:47.
  12. Shams M, Mousavizadeh A, Parhizkar S, et al. Development a tailored intervention to promote normal vaginal delivery among primigravida women: a formative research. Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2016;19:9-25. [In Persian]
  13. Zandian H, Tourani S, Moradi F, Zahirian Moghadam T. Effect of health sector evolution plan on the prevalence and costs of caesarean section and natural childbirth. Payesh. 2017;16:411-9. [In Persian]
  14. Dehnavieh R, Ghorbani Nia R, Nazeri Z. The challenges and achievements in the implementation of the natural childbirth instruction program: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2020;25:502-13.
  15. Hashemi Z, Zaboli R, Khalesi N, Fakhr-Movahedi A. Designing a Model for Effective Implementation of Promoting Natural Childbirth Program: A Mixed Study. Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal. 2020;9:e113127.
  16. World Health Organization. Midwives voices, midwives realities. Findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
  17. Khosravi S, Babaey F, Abedi P, et al. Strategies to improve the quality of midwifery care and developing midwife-centered care in Iran: analyzing the attitudes of midwifery experts. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2022;22:40.
  18. Durlak J, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008;41:327-50.
  19. Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 2017;36:253-63.
  20. Vincent C, Carthey J, Macrae C, Amalberti R. Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation. Implementation Science. 2017;12:151.
  21. Goldsmith LJ. Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report. 2021;26:2061-76.
  22. Moshki M, Khajavi A, Minaee S, et al. Perceived benefits of the disease: A qualitative study of patients’ experiences of heart failure. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2020;22:464-71.
  23. Lotfi R, Ramezani TF, Torkestani F, et al. Health system management and strategies to decrease elective cesarean section: a qualitative study. Payesh. 2015;14:59-71. [In Persian]
  24. Makvandi S, Mirzaiinajmabadi K, Tehranian N. The challenges of the physiologic childbirth program from the perspective of service providers: a qualitative approach. Hayat. 2018;24:245-60. [In Persian]
  25. van Helmond I, Korstjens I, Mesman J, et al. What makes for good collaboration and communication in maternity care? A scoping study. International Journal of Childbirth. 2015;5:210-23.
  26. McLeish J, Redshaw M. Maternity experiences of mothers with multiple disadvantages in England: a qualitative study. Women and Birth. 2019;32:178-84.
  27. Pietrzak J, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska W, Tomaszek L, Grzybowska ME. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19:1741.
  28. Behruzi R, Hatem M, Fraser W, et al. Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10:25.
  29. Johnson KM, Simon RM, Liddell JL, Kington S. Feeding the Cesarean Cycle? Examining the Role of Childbirth Education Classes. In: Mitchell Armstrong E. Reproduction, Health, and Medicine (Advances in Medical Sociology). UK:‎ Emerald Publishing; 2019. p. 241-60.
  30. Nilsson C, Hessman E, Sjöblom H, et al. Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018;18:28.
  31. Perdok H, Jans S, Verhoeven C, et al. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16:188.
  32. Kennedy HP, Doig E, Tillman S, et al. Perspectives on promoting hospital primary vaginal birth: A qualitative study. Birth. 2016;43:336-45.
  33. Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, et al. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;3:CD009514.
  34. Zakerihamidi M, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Merghati Khoei E. Vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section: a focused ethnographic study of women’s perceptions in the north of Iran. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery. 2015;3:39-50.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,611
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,437


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب