- Berndt J, Leone P, King G. Using teledentistry to provide interceptive orthodontic services to disadvantaged children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134: 700-706.
- Husin MH, Lim YK. InWalker: smart white cane for the blind. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020; 15: 701-707.
- Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23: 40.e1-40.e10.
- Shen L, He F, Zhang C, Jiang H, Wang J. Prevalence of malocclusion in primary dentition in mainland China, 1988-2017: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 4716.
- Balachandran P, Janakiram C. Prevalence of malocclusion among 8-15 years old children, India - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021; 11: 192-199.
- Nasir M, Ramadhany YF. Tele-orthodontic as a recent solution in malocclusion treatment. Makassar Dent J. 2020; 9: 78-81.
- Alogaibi YA, Murshid ZA, Alsulimani FF, Linjawi AI, Almotairi M, Alghamdi M, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among young adults in Jeddah city. J Orthod Sci. 2020; 9: 3.
- Eslamipour F, Afshari Z, Najimi A. Prevalence of malocclusion in permanent dentition of Iranian population: A review article. Iran J Public Health. 2018; 47: 178-187.
- Bustati N, Rajeh N. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients receiving orthodontic treatment: An online questionnaire cross-sectional study. J World Fed Orthod. 2020; 9: 159-163.
- Tella AJ, Olanloye OM, Ibiyemi O. Potential of teledentistry in the delivery of oral health services in developing countries. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2019; 17: 115-123.
- Daniel SJ, Kumar S. Teledentistry: a key component in access to care. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014; 14 Suppl: 201-208.
- Maspero C, Abate A, Cavagnetto D, El Morsi M, Fama A, Farronato M. Available technologies, applications and benefits of teleorthodontics: A literature review and possible applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 1891.
- Dalessandri D, Sangalli L, Tonni I, Laffranchi L, Bonetti S, Visconti L, et al. Attitude towards telemonitoring in orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Dent J (Basel). 2021; 9: 47.
- Martina S, Amato A, Rongo R, Caggiano M, Amato M. The perception of COVID-19 among Italian dentists: an orthodontic point of view. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 4384.
- Stokel-Walker C. Why telemedicine is here to stay. BMJ. 2020; 371: m3603.
- Kotantoula G, Haisraeli-Shalish M, Jerrold L. Teleorthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 219-221.
- Saccomanno S, Quinzi V, Sarhan S, Laganà D, Marzo G. Perspectives of tele-orthodontics in the COVID-19 emergency and as a future tool in daily practice. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020; 21: 157-162.
- Estai M, Kanagasingam Y, Tennant M, Bunt S. A systematic review of the research evidence for the benefits of teledentistry. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24: 147-156.
- Jacox LA, Mihas P, Cho C, Lin FC, Ko CC. Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: A qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 432-442.
- Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 43: 159-172.
- Chuttur MY. Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. 1th ed. Working Papers on Information Systems: Indiana University, USA. Sprouts: 2009. p. 37.
- Godoe P, Johansen T. Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. J European Psychology Students. 2012; 3: 38-52.
- Mortenson MJ, Vidgen R. A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management. 2016; 36: 1248-1259.
- Shachak A, Kuziemsky C, Petersen C. Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. J Biomed Inform. 2019; 100: 103315.
- Klaic M, Galea MP. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Identify Factors That Predict Likelihood to Adopt Tele-Neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 580832.
- Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences. 2008; 39: 273-315.
- Chang SJ, Im EO. A path analysis of Internet health information seeking behaviors among older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2014; 35: 137-141.
- Ebnehoseini Z, Tara M, Tabesh H, Dindar FH, Hasibian S. Understanding key factors affecting on hospital electronic health record (EHR) adoption. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9: 4348-4352.
- Sridhar A, Drahota A, Walsworth K. Facilitators and barriers to the utilization of the ACT SMART Implementation Toolkit in community-based organizations: a qualitative study. Implement Sci Commun. 2021; 2: 55.
- Usmanova G, Gresh A, Cohen MA, Kim YM, Srivastava A, Joshi CS, et al. Acceptability and Barriers to Use of the ASMAN Provider-Facing Electronic Platform for Peripartum Care in Public Facilities in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, India: A Qualitative Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model-3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 8333.
- Zhu M, Zhang Y. Medical and public health instructors' perceptions of online teaching: A qualitative study using the Technology Acceptance Model 2. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022; 27: 2385-2405.
- Zhang H, Cocosila M, Archer N. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010; 28: 49-56.
- Su YY, Huang ST, Wu YH, Chen CM. Factors Affecting Patients' Acceptance of and Satisfaction with Cloud-Based Telehealth for Chronic Disease Management: A Case Study in the Workplace. Appl Clin Inform. 2020; 11: 286-294.
- De Angelis G, Brosseau L, Davies B, King J, Wells GA. The use of information and communication technologies by arthritis health professionals to disseminate a self-management program to patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial protocol. Digit Health. 2018; 4: 2055207618819571.
- Lee SS, Tay SM, Balakrishnan A, Yeo SP, Samarasekera DD. Mobile learning in clinical settings: unveiling the paradox. Korean J Med Educ. 2021; 33: 349-367.
- Chen CK, Tsai TH, Lin YC, Lin CC, Hsu SC, Chung CY, Pei YC, Wong AMK. Acceptance of different design exergames in elders. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0200185.
- Nadri H, Rahimi B, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Samadbeik M, Garavand A. Factors Affecting Acceptance of Hospital Information Systems Based on Extended Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study in Three Paraclinical Departments. Appl Clin Inform. 2018; 9: 238-247.
- Ebrahimi S, Mehdipour Y, Karimi A, Khammarnia M, Alipour J. Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for mobile health services in healthcare settings. Health Manag Inform Sci. 2018; 5: 9-15.
- Domingos C, Costa P, Santos NC, Pêgo JM. Usability, Acceptability, and Satisfaction of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Older Adults: Observational Study in a Real-Life Context in Northern Portugal. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24: e26652.
- Ho KF, Chang PC, Kurniasari MD, Susanty S, Chung MH. Determining factors affecting nurses' acceptance of a care plan system using a modified technology acceptance model 3: structural equation model with cross-sectional data. JMIR Med Inform. 2020; 8: e15686.
- Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 2000; 11: 342-365.
- Cengiz E, Bakırtaş H. Technology acceptance model 3 in understanding employee's cloud computing technology. Global Business Review. 2020: 0972150920957173.
- Isernia S, Pagliari C, Jonsdottir J, Castiglioni C, Gindri P, Gramigna C, et al. HEAD study group. Efficiency and patient-reported outcome measures from clinic to home: The human empowerment aging and disability program for digital-health rehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2019; 10: 1206.
- Mansourzadeh M, Mahmoodi F, Hamdollah H. Investigating the effective factors on acceptance of ICT among students based on technology acceptance Model 3. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2016; 9: 357-370.
|