LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,113
تعداد مقالات10,208
تعداد مشاهده مقاله40,770,307
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,800,113
Mohammadi, Solmaz, Shojaei, Kobra, Maraghi, Elham, Motaghi, Zahra. (1402). Care Providers’ Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), 122-134. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97603.2192
Solmaz Mohammadi; Kobra Shojaei; Elham Maraghi; Zahra Motaghi. "Care Providers’ Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 2, 1402, 122-134. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97603.2192
Mohammadi, Solmaz, Shojaei, Kobra, Maraghi, Elham, Motaghi, Zahra. (1402). 'Care Providers’ Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(2), pp. 122-134. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97603.2192
Mohammadi, Solmaz, Shojaei, Kobra, Maraghi, Elham, Motaghi, Zahra. Care Providers’ Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(2): 122-134. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97603.2192

Care Providers’ Perspectives on Quality Prenatal Care in High-risk Pregnancies: A Qualitative Study

International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 42، تیر 2023، صفحه 122-134    اصل مقاله (375.14 K)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijcbnm.2023.97603.2192
نویسندگان
Solmaz Mohammadi1؛ Kobra Shojaei2؛ Elham Maraghi3؛ Zahra Motaghi* 4
1Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran;
2Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran;
3Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran;
4Department of Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
چکیده
Background: A high-risk pregnancy (HRP) is adversely affects the health of the mother, baby, or both. Most prenatal care research, rather than quality concepts, focuses on the adequacy of prenatal care and describes the emotional-psychological experiences of women with HRP. The main purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding the quality of prenatal care for women with HRP.
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in three university hospitals and 12 comprehensive health centers in Ahvaz (Iran) from December 2020 to May 2021. In the present study, 10 midwives, 2 executive directors, and 7 specialists were purposefully selected with maximum diversity. In-depth semi-structured individual interviews were used to collect the data. Data were analyzed concurrently using Elo and Kinga’s content analysis. The MAXQDA software version 10 was used for data analysis.
Results: During data analysis, the 6 main categories “infrastructure for care provision”, “optimal clinical care”, “organizing referrals”, “preconception care”, “risk assessment”, and “family-centered care” and 14 subcategories were identified.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that professional groups focused on the technical aspects of caring. The findings from this study highlight several conditions that can affect the quality of prenatal care for women with HRP. Healthcare providers can use these factors to effectively manage HRPs, thereby improving pregnancy outcomes among women with HRPs.
کلیدواژه‌ها
High-risk pregnancy؛ Qualitative research؛ Prenatal care؛ Perspective
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Zhou H, Wang A, Huang X, et al. Quality antenatal care protects against low birth weight in 42 poor counties of Western China. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210393.
  2. Leal MdC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Viellas EF, et al. Prenatal care in the Brazilian public health services. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2020;54:08.
  3. Makate M, Makate C. The impact of prenatal care quality on neonatal, infant and child mortality in Zimbabwe: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Health Policy and Planning. 2017;32:395-404.
  4. Moazzeni MS. Maternal mortality in the Islamic Republic of Iran: on track and in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2013;17:577-80.
  5. Mirzaee K, Oladi Ghadikolaee S, Taghi Shakeri M, Mousavi Bazzaz M. Maternal knowledge on postpartum care in healthcare centers of Mashhad, Iran in 2013. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2015;3:456-64.
  6. Azmoude E, Aradmehr M, Dehghani F. Midwives’ attitude and barriers of evidence based practice in maternity care. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;25:120-8.
  7. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015;122:1045-9.
  8. Ghaffari F, Jahani Shourab N, Jafarnejad F, Esmaily H. Application of Donabedian quality-of-care framework to assess the outcomes of preconception care in urban health centers, Mashhad, Iran in 2012. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2014;2:50-9.
  9. Bahri N, Arabnejad BA, Bahri N, et al. Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation for assessment of the quality of practice of health practitioners during preconception, prenatal and postnatal cares. Koomesh. 2015;17:45-53. [In Persian]
  10. Karimian Z, Sarafraz N, Sadat Z, et al. Evaluation Of Midwifery Care Quality And Satisfaction Of Its In Labor And Delivery Units In Kashan University Of Medical Sciences Hospitals In 2011. Nursing And Midwifery Journal. 2014;12:858-65. [In Persian]
  11. Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17:329.
  12. Olander EK, Aquino MRJR, Bryar R. Three perspectives on the co-location of maternity services: qualitative interviews with mothers, midwives and health visitors. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020. [Online]. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1712338.
  13. Brown AF, Ma GX, Miranda J, et al. Structural interventions to reduce and eliminate health disparities. American Journal of Public Health. 2019;109:S72-8.
  14. Janighorban M, Heidari Z, Dadkhah A, Mohammadi F. Women’s needs on bed rest during high-risk pregnancy and postpartum period: A qualitative study. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2018;6:1336-44.
  15. Shojaeian Z, Khadivzadeh T, Sahebi A, et al. Knowledge Valuation by Iranian Women with High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Content Analysis. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery. 2020;8:243-52.
  16. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62:107-15.
  17. Cope DG. Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2014;41:89-91.
  18. Nikoloski Z, Mossialos E. Corruption, inequality and population perception of healthcare quality in Europe. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13:472.
  19. Sword W, Heaman MI, Brooks S, et al. Women’s and care providers’ perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12:29.
  20. Akyüz E, Erdemir F. Surgical patients’ and nurses’ opinions and expectations about privacy in care. Nursing Ethics. 2013;20:660-71.
  21. Ejigu T, Woldie M, Kifle Y. Quality of antenatal care services at public health facilities of Bahir-Dar special zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13:443.
  22. Janssen MAP, van Achterberg T, Adriaansen MJ, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of the guideline triage in emergency departments: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2012;21:437-47.
  23. Sengane M. Mothers’ expectations of midwives’ care during labour in a public hospital in Gauteng. Curationis. 2013;36:E1-9.
  24. Ahmadi Z. Evaluation of the effect of continuous midwifery support on pain intensity in labor and delivery. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2010;9:293-304. [In Persian]
  25. Behruzi R, Klam S, Dehertog M, et al. Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17:200.
  26. Gheibizadeh M, Abedi HA, Mohammadi E, Abedi P. Iranian women and care providers’ perceptions of equitable prenatal care: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics. 2016;23:465-77.
  27. Singh S, Doyle P, Campbell OM, et al. Referrals between public sector health institutions for women with obstetric high risk, complications, or emergencies in India-A systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159793.
  28. Raj SS, Manthri S, Sahoo PK. Emergency referral transport for maternal complication: lessons from the community based maternal death audits in Unnao district, Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2015;4:99-106.
  29. Chaturvedi S, Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. Quality of obstetric referral services in India’s JSY cash transfer programme for institutional births: a study from Madhya Pradesh province. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96773.
  30. Hussein J, Kanguru L, Astin M, Munjanja S. The effectiveness of emergency obstetric referral interventions in developing country settings: a systematic review. PLoS Medicine. 2012;9:e1001264.
  31. Mason E, Chandra-Mouli V, Baltag V, et al. Preconception care: advancing from ‘important to do and can be done’to ‘is being done and is making a difference’. Reproductive Health. 2014;11:S8.
  32. Hemsing N, Greaves L, Poole N. Preconception health care interventions: a scoping review. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2017;14:24-32.
  33. Farahi N, Zolotor A. Recommendations for preconception counseling and care. American Family Physician. 2013;88:499-506.
  34. Tuomainen H, Cross-Bardell L, Bhoday M, et al. Opportunities and challenges for enhancing preconception health in primary care: qualitative study with women from ethnically diverse communities. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002977.
  35. Schetter CD, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2012;25:141-8.
  36. Cené CW, Haymore LB, Lin FC, et al. Family member accompaniment to routine medical visits is associated with better self-care in heart failure patients. Chronic Illness. 2015;11:21-32.
  37. Rosland AM, Piette JD, Choi H, Heisler M. Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences. Medical Care. 2011;49:37-45.
  38. Andrades M, Kausar S, Ambreen A. Role and influence of the patient’s companion in family medicine consultations:“The Patient’s Perspective”. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2013;2:283-7.
  39. Igel LH, Lerner BH. Moving past individual and “pure” autonomy: the rise of family-centered patient care. AMA Journal of Ethics. 2016;18:56-62.
  40. Rimmer A. Can patients use family members as non-professional interpreters in consultations? BMJ. 2020;368:m447.
  41. Whitehead L, Jacob E, Towell A, et al. The role of the family in supporting the self‐management of chronic conditions: A qualitative systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2018;27:22-30.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,510
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 885


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب