LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,154
تعداد مقالات10,540
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,759,883
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,367,245
Gedam, Varsha Raghunathji, Pradhan, Anirudh. (1403). Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), 335-346. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1549
Varsha Raghunathji Gedam; Anirudh Pradhan. "Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 4, 1403, 335-346. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1549
Gedam, Varsha Raghunathji, Pradhan, Anirudh. (1403). 'Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), pp. 335-346. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1549
Gedam, Varsha Raghunathji, Pradhan, Anirudh. Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 14(4): 335-346. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1549

Comparison of three Radiotherapy Techniques Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Variable and Constant Dose Rate and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for the Irradiation of Five Cancer Sites

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 14، شماره 4، آبان 2024، صفحه 335-346    اصل مقاله (1.54 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1549
نویسندگان
Varsha Raghunathji Gedam* 1، 2؛ Anirudh Pradhan3
1Department of Medical Physics, Delhi State Cancer Institute, Dilshad Garden-110095, Delhi, India
2Department of Physics, GLA University, Mathura-281406, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Centre for Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Space Science, GLA University, Mathura-281406, Uttar Pradesh, India
چکیده
Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is mostly considered due to its superior tumor coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) with shorter treatment delivery time.
Objective: This study aimed to explore the feasibility and potential benefits of VMAT with a constant dose rate (CDR).
Material and Methods: In this analytical study, 75 cancer patients (15 from each cancer) were selected. Step and shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (S&S IMRT), CDR, and VDR VMAT (variable dose rate VMAT) plans were generated for each patient using the Monte Carlo algorithm on the Monaco treatment planning system for 6 MV photon energy. For dosimetric comparison, some variables were compared, including doses to the planning target volume (PTV), OAR, homogeneity index, conformity index (CI), treatment delivery time, and monitor units.
Results: CI was higher in CDR and VDR VMAT plans compared to IMRT without any significant variation for PTV coverage V95 and PTV mean dose. In the sparing of OAR, no significant variation was found between CDR, VDR, and IMRT for the brain, head-neck, oesophagus, lung, and prostate. The treatment delivery time was reduced more, i.e., by up to 72-80% in the CDR VMAT technique compared to IMRT. 
Conclusion: CDR VMAT technique generates a clinically acceptable plan in terms of PTV coverage, dose conformity, and OAR sparing as IMRT and VDR VMAT in all five cancer sites.

تازه های تحقیق

Anirudh Pradhan (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Radiotherapy؛ Head and Neck؛ Brain؛ Prostate؛ Esophagus؛ Lung
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Chandra A, Guerrero TM, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Liao Z, Wang X, et al. Feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy to improve lung sparing in treatment planning for distal esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.017. PubMed PMID: 16298001.
  2. Gupta T, Sinha S, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, Mummudi N, Swain M, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: long-term and mature outcomes of a prospective randomized trial. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01666-5. PubMed PMID: 32938468. PubMed PMCID: PMC7493335.
  3. Ding M, Newman F, Chen C, Stuhr K, Gaspar LE. Dosimetric comparison between 3DCRT and IMRT using different multileaf collimators in the treatment of brain tumors. Med Dosim. 2009;34(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.001. PubMed PMID: 19181248.
  4. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35(1):310-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2818738. PubMed PMID: 18293586.
  5. Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1007):967-96. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22373346. PubMed PMID: 22011829. PubMed PMCID: PMC3473700.
  6. Rana SB. Volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy in lung cancer: Current literature review. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2013;2(1):9-13. doi: 10.4103/2278-0513.110758.
  7. Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, Bieker M, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(1):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.033. PubMed PMID: 19362244.
  8. Yoo S, Wu QJ, Lee WR, Yin FF. Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1677. PubMed PMID: 20044214.
  9. Popescu CC, Olivotto IA, Beckham WA, Ansbacher W, Zavgorodni S, Shaffer R, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy improves dosimetry and reduces treatment time compared to conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer and internal mammary nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(1):287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.038. PubMed PMID: 19775832.
  10. Iori M, Cattaneo GM, Cagni E, Fiorino C, Borasi G, Riccardo C, et al. Dose-volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.03.003. PubMed PMID: 18395811.
  11. Didona A, Lancellotta V, Zucchetti C, Panizza BM, Frattegiani A, Iacco M, et al. Is volumetric modulated arc therapy with constant dose rate a valid option in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23(3):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.007. PubMed PMID: 29765265. PubMed PMCID: PMC5948416.
  12. Yu W, Shang H, Xie C, Han C, Yi J, Zhou Y, Jin X. Feasibility of constant dose rate VMAT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:235. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0235-1. PubMed PMID: 25366034. PubMed PMCID: PMC4222390.
  13. McGarry CK, McMahon SJ, Craft D, O’Sullivan JM, Prise KM, Hounsell AR. Inverse planned constant dose rate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as an efficient alternative to five-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate. J Radiother Pract. 2014;13(1):68-78. doi: 10.1017/S1460396913000083.
  14. Hatanaka S, Tamaki S, Endo H, Mizuno N, Nakamura N. Utility of Smart Arc CDR for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Radiat Res. 2014;55(4):774-9. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt232. PubMed PMID: 24522268. PubMed PMCID: PMC4099990.
  15. Palma D, Vollans E, James K, Nakano S, Moiseenko V, Shaffer R, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(4):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.047. PubMed PMID: 18455326.
  16. Yang R, Wang J, Xu F, Li H, Zhang X. Feasibility study of volumetric modulated arc therapy with constant dose rate for endometrial cancer. Med Dosim. 2013;38(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.04.001. PubMed PMID: 23669454.
  17. De Ornelas-Couto M, Mihaylov I, Dogan N. Assessment of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy for Constant and Variable Dose Rates. J Med Phys. 2017;42(4):199-205. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_65_17. PubMed PMID: 29296033. PubMed PMCID: PMC5744447.
  18. Gedam VR, Pradhan A. Dosimetric comparison of constant dose rate volumetric modulated arc therapy (CDR-VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gallbladder cancer. J Radiother Pract. 2022;21(2):228-33. doi: 10.1017/S1460396920001132.
  19. Paddick I. A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(Suppl 3):219-22. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement. PubMed PMID: 11143252.
  20. Lin JC, Tsai JT, Chang CC, Jen YM, Li MH, Liu WH. Comparing treatment plan in all locations of esophageal cancer: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(17):e750. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000750. PubMed PMID: 25929910. PubMed PMCID: PMC4603071.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 162,195
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 631


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب