LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات10,007
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,729,537
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,338,044
Rezaeian, Nahid, Hosseini, Leila, Samiei, Niloufar, Azimian, Maryam, Rashidinejad, Alireza, Toloueitabar, Yaser, Hemmati Komasi, Mohammad Mehdi, Shayan, Leila, Asadian, Sanaz. (1402). Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(4), 370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590
Nahid Rezaeian; Leila Hosseini; Niloufar Samiei; Maryam Azimian; Alireza Rashidinejad; Yaser Toloueitabar; Mohammad Mehdi Hemmati Komasi; Leila Shayan; Sanaz Asadian. "Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48, 4, 1402, 370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590
Rezaeian, Nahid, Hosseini, Leila, Samiei, Niloufar, Azimian, Maryam, Rashidinejad, Alireza, Toloueitabar, Yaser, Hemmati Komasi, Mohammad Mehdi, Shayan, Leila, Asadian, Sanaz. (1402). 'Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(4), pp. 370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590
Rezaeian, Nahid, Hosseini, Leila, Samiei, Niloufar, Azimian, Maryam, Rashidinejad, Alireza, Toloueitabar, Yaser, Hemmati Komasi, Mohammad Mehdi, Shayan, Leila, Asadian, Sanaz. Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 48(4): 370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590

Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
مقاله 3، دوره 48، شماره 4، مهر 2023، صفحه 370-378    اصل مقاله (1.08 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article(s)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590
نویسندگان
Nahid Rezaeian1؛ Leila Hosseini2؛ Niloufar Samiei3؛ Maryam Azimian4؛ Alireza Rashidinejad5؛ Yaser Toloueitabar6؛ Mohammad Mehdi Hemmati Komasi4؛ Leila Shayan7؛ Sanaz Asadian* 1
1Department of Radiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Echocardiography, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Heart Valves Disease Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Department of Interventional Cardiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7Trauma Research Center, Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the recommended imaging technique for the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, in cases with inconclusive findings, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) planimetry is used to grade AS severity. This study aimed to compare the results derived from TTE and CMR in patients with severe AS with normal left ventricular (LV) function.
Methods: In a prospective study, 20 patients with severe AS were recruited and data derived from TTE and CMR modalities were compared with the archived records of 28 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The data included aortic valve area (AVA), MRI-derived biventricular global strains, and TTE-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS). SPSS software was used to analyze the data with independent samples t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Pearson correlation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: An excellent agreement was found in AVA values derived from CMR and TTE with an average ICC of 0.932 (95% CI=0.829-0.973). There was a significant difference in LV-GLS, LV global radial strain (GRS), right ventricular (RV) GRS, and RV global circumferential strain between the groups. A good correlation was found between CMR- and TTE-derived GLS with an average ICC of 0.721 (95% C=0.255-0.896). The mean aortic valve pressure gradient in TTE had a significant inverse linear correlation with LV-GRS in CMR (r=-0.537). All P values were <0.05.
Conclusion: There was a good agreement between AVA and strain values derived from cardiac MRI and TTE. The myocardial strain was impaired in patients with severe AS and normal LV function and correlated with disease severity.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Aortic valve stenosis؛ Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)؛ Echocardiography؛ Ventricular function
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Marciniak A, Glover K, Sharma R. Cohort profile: prevalence of valvular heart disease in community patients with suspected heart failure in UK. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e012240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012240. PubMed PMID: 28131996; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5278264.
  2. Ng ACT, Prihadi EA, Antoni ML, Bertini M, Ewe SH, Ajmone Marsan N, et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is predictive of all-cause mortality independent of aortic stenosis severity and ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:859-67. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex189. PubMed PMID: 28950306.
  3. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8. PubMed PMID: 16980116.
  4. Mihaljevic T, Nowicki ER, Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH, Lagazzi L, Thomas J, et al. Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1270-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.042. PubMed PMID: 18544369.
  5. Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Razzouk A. Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1781-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.008. PubMed PMID: 19021976.
  6. Salcedo EE, Gill EA. Clinical Applications of Strain Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease. Advances in Complex Valvular Disease. 2020. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.93341.
  7. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, Belohlavek M, Cardim NM, Derumeaux G, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:277-313. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015. PubMed PMID: 21338865.
  8. Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick TH, Houle H, Baumann R, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1-11. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu184. PubMed PMID: 25525063.
  9. Jafari F, Safaei AM, Hosseini L, Asadian S, Kamangar TM, Zadehbagheri F, et al. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and monitoring of cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer after treatment: a comprehensive review. Heart Fail Rev. 2021;26:679-97. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-10028-y. PubMed PMID: 33029698.
  10. Cannon SR, Richards KL, Crawford MH, Folland ED, Pierpont G, Sethi GK, et al. Inadequacy of the Gorlin formula for predicting prosthetic valve area. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:113-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91374-4. PubMed PMID: 3381730.
  11. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, 3rd, Guyton RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440-92. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029. PubMed PMID: 24589852.
  12. Yoon YE, Hong YJ, Kim HK, Kim JA, Na JO, Yang DH, et al. 2014 Korean guidelines for appropriate utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a joint report of the Korean Society of Cardiology and the Korean Society of Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:659-88. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.659. PubMed PMID: 25469078; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4248622.
  13. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart. 2004;90:893-901. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.022376. PubMed PMID: 15253962; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1768383.
  14. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, et al. Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:372-92. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009. PubMed PMID: 28385280.
  15. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230-68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl428. PubMed PMID: 17259184.
  16. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of C, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451-96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109. PubMed PMID: 22922415.
  17. Sondergaard L, Hildebrandt P, Lindvig K, Thomsen C, Stahlberg F, Kassis E, et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1156-64. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-z. PubMed PMID: 8237760.
  18. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, Gutersohn A, Buck T, Bartel T, et al. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology. 2008;109:126-34. doi: 10.1159/000105554. PubMed PMID: 17713328.
  19. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1220-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-z. PubMed PMID: 8459080.
  20. Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, Gown AM, O’Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90:844-53. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.844. PubMed PMID: 7519131.
  21. Obokata M, Nagata Y, Wu VC, Kado Y, Kurabayashi M, Otsuji Y, et al. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and 2D/3D echocardiography speckle tracking for evaluation of global left ventricular strain. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:525-32. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev227. PubMed PMID: 26377901.
  22. Onishi T, Saha SK, Delgado-Montero A, Ludwig DR, Onishi T, Schelbert EB, et al. Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.018. PubMed PMID: 25577185.
  23. Asadian S, Rezaeian N, Hosseini L, Toloueitabar Y, Komasi MMH, Shayan L. How does iron deposition modify the myocardium? A feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37:3269-77. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02305-0. PubMed PMID: 34105082.
  24. Chimura M, Onishi T, Tsukishiro Y, Sawada T, Kiuchi K, Shimane A, et al. Longitudinal strain combined with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2017;103:679-86. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309746. PubMed PMID: 27799316.
  25. Safaei AM, Kamangar TM, Asadian S, Rezaeian N, Esmati E, Kolahdouzan K, et al. Detection of the Early Cardiotoxic Effects of Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with Breast Cancer through Novel Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Short-term Follow-up. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2021;11:33. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_58_2021. PubMed PMID: 34221642; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8247694.
  26. Dahl JS, Videbaek L, Poulsen MK, Rudbaek TR, Pellikka PA, Moller JE. Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:613-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973834. PubMed PMID: 22869821.
  27. Hwang JW, Kim SM, Park SJ, Cho EJ, Kim EK, Chang SA, et al. Assessment of reverse remodeling predicted by myocardial deformation on tissue tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:80. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0392-0. PubMed PMID: 29061184; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5654100.
  28. Ozawa K, Funabashi N, Kobayashi Y. Left ventricular myocardial strain gradient using a novel multi-layer transthoracic echocardiography technique positively correlates with severity of aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.275. PubMed PMID: 27404678.
  29. Vollema E, Ng A, Ajmone Marsan N, Delgado V, Bax J. P6127Progression of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal. 2017;38.
  30. Kearney LG, Lu K, Ord M, Patel SK, Profitis K, Matalanis G, et al. Global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:827-33. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes115. PubMed PMID: 22736713.
  31. Klaeboe LG, Haland TF, Leren IS, Ter Bekke RMA, Brekke PH, Rosjo H, et al. Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Deformation Parameters in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Pilot Study of the Usefulness of Strain Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:727-35. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.04.009. PubMed PMID: 28599826.
  32. Kusunose K, Goodman A, Parikh R, Barr T, Agarwal S, Popovic ZB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:938-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002041. PubMed PMID: 25320287.
  33. Ng AC, Delgado V, Bertini M, Antoni ML, van Bommel RJ, van Rijnsoever EP, et al. Alterations in multidirectional myocardial functions in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction: a two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1542-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr084. PubMed PMID: 21447510.
  34. Stokke TM, Hasselberg NE, Smedsrud MK, Sarvari SI, Haugaa KH, Smiseth OA, et al. Geometry as a Confounder When Assessing Ventricular Systolic Function: Comparison Between Ejection Fraction and Strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:942-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.046. PubMed PMID: 28818204.
  35. Vollema EM, Sugimoto T, Shen M, Tastet L, Ng ACT, Abou R, et al. Association of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Natural Course and Prognostic Value. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:839-47. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2288. PubMed PMID: 30140889; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6233650
  36. Miyazaki S, Daimon M, Miyazaki T, Onishi Y, Koiso Y, Nishizaki Y, et al. Global longitudinal strain in relation to the severity of aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Echocardiography. 2011;28:703-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01419.x. PubMed PMID: 21564277.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 540
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 329


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب