LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,113
تعداد مقالات10,208
تعداد مشاهده مقاله40,780,114
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,803,918
Rezaei, Bahareh, Khorrami Banaraki, Anahita, Yadegari, Fariba, Mazdeh, Mehrdokht. (1402). Comparison of the Effect of Four Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Configurations on Picture-Naming Improvement in Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(3), 292-301. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94867.2619
Bahareh Rezaei; Anahita Khorrami Banaraki; Fariba Yadegari; Mehrdokht Mazdeh. "Comparison of the Effect of Four Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Configurations on Picture-Naming Improvement in Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48, 3, 1402, 292-301. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94867.2619
Rezaei, Bahareh, Khorrami Banaraki, Anahita, Yadegari, Fariba, Mazdeh, Mehrdokht. (1402). 'Comparison of the Effect of Four Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Configurations on Picture-Naming Improvement in Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 48(3), pp. 292-301. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94867.2619
Rezaei, Bahareh, Khorrami Banaraki, Anahita, Yadegari, Fariba, Mazdeh, Mehrdokht. Comparison of the Effect of Four Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Configurations on Picture-Naming Improvement in Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 48(3): 292-301. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94867.2619

Comparison of the Effect of Four Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Configurations on Picture-Naming Improvement in Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
مقاله 7، دوره 48، شماره 3، مرداد 2023، صفحه 292-301    اصل مقاله (1.47 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article(s)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/ijms.2022.94867.2619
نویسندگان
Bahareh Rezaei* 1؛ Anahita Khorrami Banaraki2، 3؛ Fariba Yadegari4؛ Mehrdokht Mazdeh5
1Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran
3Brain and Cognition Clinic, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
چکیده
Background: Anomia is a language disorder that negatively affects communication abilities in people with aphasia (PWA). We aimed to compare the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) on the picture-naming accuracy and reaction time in PWA.
Methods: A randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial was conducted in 2021 at Mobasher Kashani Clinic, Hamadan, Iran. Sixteen patients received both five days of real-tDCS (1 mA for 20 minutes) and five days of sham-tDCS with a seven-day washout period in between. Using the Persian aphasia naming test, picture-naming accuracy and reaction time on 50 images were assessed at baseline, real-tDCS, and sham-tDCS stages. The data were analyzed using STATA software, version 11.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Sixteen non-fluent PWA participated in the study. Of all patients, 64% benefited from tDCS over the STG and 18% over the IFG. The results showed that real-tDCS had a significant effect on the picture-naming accuracy (P=0.003) and the Persian-Western aphasia battery-one score (P=0.01), whereas sham-tDCS had no noticeable effects. Both the real- and sham-tDCS had no significant effect on the reaction time (P=0.28).
Conclusion: Five sessions of individualized tDCS protocol (1 mA for 20 minutes) were adequate to improve picture-naming accuracy in patients with chronic aphasia. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Transcranial direct current stimulation؛ Aphasia؛ Anomia؛ Reaction time
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Maher LM, Raymer AM. Management of anomia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:10-21. doi: 10.1310/318R-RMD5-055J-PQ40. PubMed PMID: 14872396.
  2. Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41:1229-36. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785. PubMed PMID: 20395612; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2876210.
  3. Cotelli M, Fertonani A, Miozzo A, Rosini S, Manenti R, Padovani A, et al. Anomia training and brain stimulation in chronic aphasia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:717-41. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.621275. PubMed PMID: 22011016.
  4. Fiori V, Coccia M, Marinelli CV, Vecchi V, Bonifazi S, Ceravolo MG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23:2309-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21579. PubMed PMID: 20946060.
  5. Jung IY, Lim JY, Kang EK, Sohn HM, Paik NJ. The Factors Associated with Good Responses to Speech Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Aphasic Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35:460-9. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.460. PubMed PMID: 22506160; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3309227.
  6. Talimkhani A, Abdollahi I, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mazdeh M, Rezaei B. Evaluation and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Motor Learning Process in Chronic Unilateral Stroke Patients. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2022;16:530-49. doi: 10.32598/sija.2020.2946.1.
  7. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x. PubMed PMID: 10990547; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2270099.
  8. Talimkhani A, Rezaei B. Transcranial direct current stimulation and its application in rehabilitation sciences. Tehran: Setayesh Hasti; 2022.
  9. Fiori V, Cipollari S, Di Paola M, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Marangolo P. tDCS stimulation segregates words in the brain: evidence from aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:269. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00269. PubMed PMID: 23785323; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3682157.
  10. Volpato C, Cavinato M, Piccione F, Garzon M, Meneghello F, Birbaumer N. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Broca’s area in chronic aphasia: a controlled outcome study. Behav Brain Res. 2013;247:211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.03.029. PubMed PMID: 23538068.
  11. Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Baker JM, Moser D, Rorden C. Activity in preserved left hemisphere regions predicts anomia severity in aphasia. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:1013-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp160. PubMed PMID: 19687294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2852500.
  12. Wu D, Wang J, Yuan Y. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on naming and cortical excitability in stroke patients with aphasia. Neurosci Lett. 2015;589:115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.01.045. PubMed PMID: 25603474.
  13. Kang EK, Kim YK, Sohn HM, Cohen LG, Paik NJ. Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29:141-52. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0587. PubMed PMID: 21586821; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4886370.
  14. Spielmann K, van de Sandt-Koenderman WM, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Ribbers GM. Comparison of two configurations of transcranial direct current stimulation for aphasia treatment. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:527-33. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2338. PubMed PMID: 29736552.
  15. Silva FRD, Mac-Kay A, Chao JC, Santos MDD, Gagliadi RJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a study on naming performance in aphasic individuals. Codas. 2018;30:e20170242. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017242. PubMed PMID: 30184007.
  16. Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:530-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.122457. PubMed PMID: 17846113.
  17. Watila MM, Balarabe SA. Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery. J Neurol Sci. 2015;352:12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.020. PubMed PMID: 25888529.
  18. Ansaldo AI, Arguin M, Roch Lecours A. The contribution of the right cerebral hemisphere to the recovery from aphasia: a single longitudinal case study. Brain Lang. 2002;82:206-22. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00017-2. PubMed PMID: 12096877.
  19. You DS, Kim DY, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang. 2011;119:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.002. PubMed PMID: 21641021.
  20. Basat ALB, Gvion A, Vatine J-J, Mashal N. Transcranial direct current stimulation to improve naming abilities of persons with chronic aphasia: A preliminary study using individualized based protocol. Journal of neurolinguistics. 2016;38:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.09.004.
  21. Sibbald B, Roberts C. Understanding controlled trials. Crossover trials. BMJ. 1998;316:1719. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1719. PubMed PMID: 9614025; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1113275.
  22. Siyasinghe N, Sooriyarachchi M. Guidelines for calculating sample size in 2x2 crossover trials: a simulation study. Journal of The National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka. 2011;39:77-89. doi: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v39i1.2929.
  23. Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Baker JM, Rorden C. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke. 2011;42:819-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600288. PubMed PMID: 21233468; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8210639.
  24. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. PubMed PMID: 5146491.
  25. Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr. 2003;16:95-9. doi: 10.1023/b:brat.0000006333.93597.9d. PubMed PMID: 14977202.
  26. Nilipour R, Pourshahbaz A, Ghoreyshi ZS. Reliability and Validity of Bedside Version of Persian WAB (P-WAB-1). Basic Clin Neurosci. 2014;5:253-8. PubMed PMID: 27284389; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4656930.
  27. Ghasisin L, Yadegari F, Rahgozar M, Nazari A, Rastegarianzade N. A new set of 272 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: Persian norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47:1148-58. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0537-0. PubMed PMID: 25425392.
  28. Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature. 1996;380:499-505. doi: 10.1038/380499a0. PubMed PMID: 8606767.
  29. Damasio H, Tranel D, Grabowski T, Adolphs R, Damasio A. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition. 2004;92:179-229. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.07.001. PubMed PMID: 15037130.
  30. Friederici AD, Gierhan SM. The language network. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.10.002. PubMed PMID: 23146876.
  31. Hagoort P. Nodes and networks in the neural architecture for language: Broca’s region and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;28:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.013. PubMed PMID: 25062474.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 840
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 549


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب