LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,999
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,658,220
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,329,833
Aljobouri, Hadeel K. (1402). Independent Component Analysis with Functional Neuroscience Data Analysis. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), 169-180. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1436
Hadeel K Aljobouri. "Independent Component Analysis with Functional Neuroscience Data Analysis". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 2, 1402, 169-180. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1436
Aljobouri, Hadeel K. (1402). 'Independent Component Analysis with Functional Neuroscience Data Analysis', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), pp. 169-180. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1436
Aljobouri, Hadeel K. Independent Component Analysis with Functional Neuroscience Data Analysis. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(2): 169-180. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1436

Independent Component Analysis with Functional Neuroscience Data Analysis

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 13، شماره 2، خرداد و تیر 2023، صفحه 169-180    اصل مقاله (2.2 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2111-1436
نویسنده
Hadeel K Aljobouri*
Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, IRAQ
چکیده
Background: Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is the most common and standard technique used in functional neuroscience data analysis. 
Objective: In this study, two of the significant functional brain techniques are introduced as a model for neuroscience data analysis.
Material and Methods: In this experimental and analytical study, Electroencephalography (EEG) signal and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) were analyzed and managed by the developed tool. The introduced package combines Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to recognize significant dimensions of the data in neuroscience. This study combines EEG and fMRI in the same package for analysis and comparison results. 
Results: The findings of this study indicated the performance of the ICA, which can be dealt with the presented easy-to-use and learn intuitive toolbox. The user can deal with EEG and fMRI data in the same module. Thus, all outputs were analyzed and compared at the same time; the users can then import the neurofunctional datasets easily and select the desired portions of the functional biosignal for further processing using the ICA method.  
Conclusion: A new toolbox and functional graphical user interface, running in cross-platform MATLAB, was presented and applied to biomedical engineering research centers.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Electroencephalogram؛ Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)؛ Graphical User Interface (GUI)؛ Independent Component Analysis (ICA)؛ Functional Neuroscience
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Cerutti S, Marchesi C. Advanced methods of biomedical signal processing. Wiley-IEEE Press; 2011.
  2. Semmlow JL. Biosignal and biomedical image processing: MATLAB-based applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004.
  3. Theis FJ, Meyer-Bäse A. Biomedical signal analysis: contemporary methods and applications. MIT Press; 2010.
  4. AL-Jobouri HK, Çankaya İ, Karal O. From biomedical signal processing techniques to fMRI Parcellation. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2015;12(2):1115-38. doi: 10.13005/bbra/1764.
  5. Subha DP, Joseph PK, Acharya U R, Lim CM. EEG signal analysis: a survey. Journal of Medical Systems. 2010;34(2):195-212. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9231-z.
  6. AlJobouri HK, Ali FE. Brain-Computer Interface Based on VEP and FMRI Package. Am J Biomed Sci. 2019;11(1):36-43. doi: 10.5099/aj190100036.
  7. Aljobouri HK, Jaber HA, Kocak OM, Algin O, Cankaya I. Clustering fMRI data with a robust unsupervised learning algorithm for neuroscience data mining. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2018;299:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.02.007.
  8. Ashby FG. Statistical analysis of fMRI data. MIT Press; 2011.
  9. Jung TP, Makeig S, McKeown MJ, Bell AJ, Lee TW, Sejnowski TJ. Imaging Brain Dynamics Using Independent Component Analysis. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2001;89(7):1107-22. doi: 10.1109/5.939827. PubMed PMID: 20824156. PubMed PMCID: PMC2932458.
  10. Plank M. Independent Component Analysis– demystified. 2014. Available from: https://www.brainproducts.com/files/public/products/brochures_material/pr_articles/1402_ST_ICA.pdf.
  11. Ungureanu M, Bigan C, Strungaru R, Lazarescu V. Independent component analysis applied in biomedical signal processing. Measurement Science Review. 2004;4(2):18.
  12. Sun L, Liu Y, Beadle PJ. Independent component analysis of EEG signals. In Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Workshop on VLSI Design and Video Technology; Suzhou, China: IEEE; 2005. p. 219-22.
  13. Winkler I, Haufe S, Tangermann M. Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-7-30. PubMed PMID: 21810266. PubMed PMCID: PMC3175453.
  14. Hyvärinen A, Oja E. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 2000;13(4-5):411-30. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5. PubMed PMID: 10946390.
  15. Naik GR, Kumar DK. An overview of independent component analysis and its applications. Informatica. 2011;35(1):68-82.
  16. Raimondo F, Kamienkowski JE, Sigman M, Fernandez Slezak D. CUDAICA: GPU optimization of Infomax-ICA EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2012;2012:206972. doi: 10.1155/2012/206972. PubMed PMID: 22811699. PubMed PMCID: PMC3395116.
  17. Rejer I, Gorski P. Benefits of ICA in the Case of a Few Channel EEG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:7434-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320110. PubMed PMID: 26738010.
  18. Calhoun VD, Adali T, Pearlson GD, Pekar JJ. A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;14(3):140-51. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1048. PubMed PMID: 11559959. PubMed PMCID: PMC6871952.
  19. Calhoun VD, Adalı T. Multisubject independent component analysis of fMRI: a decade of intrinsic networks, default mode, and neurodiagnostic discovery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:60-73. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2012.2211076. PubMed PMID: 23231989. PubMed PMCID: PMC4433055.
  20. Chen Z, Calhoun VD. Task-evoked brain functional magnetic susceptibility mapping by independent component analysis (χICA). J Neurosci Methods. 2016;261:161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.01.007. PubMed PMID: 26778607.
  21. Moritz CH, Haughton VM, Cordes D, Quigley M, Meyerand ME. Whole-brain functional MR imaging activation from a finger-tapping task examined with independent component analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(9):1629-35. PubMed PMID: 11039341. PubMed PMCID: PMC8174873.
  22. Calhoun VD, Adali T, Pearlson GD, van Zijl PC, Pekar JJ. Independent component analysis of fMRI data in the complex domain. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(1):180-92. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10202. PubMed PMID: 12111945.
  23. Bi XA, Sun Q, Zhao J, Xu Q, Wang L. Non-linear ICA Analysis of Resting-State fMRI in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:413. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00413. PubMed PMID: 29970984. PubMed PMCID: PMC6018085.
  24. Song XW, Dong ZY, Long XY, Li SF, Zuo XN, Zhu CZ, et al. REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025031. PubMed PMID: 21949842. PubMed PMCID: PMC3176805.
  25. Jaber HA, Aljobouri HK, Çankaya İ, Koçak OM, Algin O. Preparing fMRI data for postprocessing: Conversion modalities, preprocessing pipeline, and parametric and nonparametric approaches. IEEE Access. 2019;7:122864-77. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937482.
  26. Jaber H, Aljobouri H, Kocak O, Algin O, Çankaya I. VCfMRI: A Matlab Toolbox for Visualization and Conversion of fMRI Data Modalities. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2021.1694.1.
  27. Aljobouri HK. A Virtual EMG Signal Control and Analysis for Optimal Hardware Design. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering. 2022;18(2):154-66. doi: 10.3991/IJOE.V18I02.27047.
  28. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. PubMed PMID: 15102499.
  29. Aguera PE, Jerbi K, Caclin A, Bertrand O. ELAN: a software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:158970.
  30. Abou-loukh SJ, Ibrahim AK. Speech denoising using mixed transform. Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences. 2013;16(1):1-8.
  31. Statistical Parametric Mapping. 1991. Available from: https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/.
  32. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. Fsl. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):782-90.
  33. Bidgood WD Jr, Horii SC, Prior FW, Van Syckle DE. Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):199-212. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040199. PubMed PMID: 9147339. PubMed PMCID: PMC61235.
  34. Robb RA, Hanson DP, Karwoski RA, Larson AG, Workman EL, Stacy MC. Analyze: a comprehensive, operator-interactive software package for multidimensional medical image display and analysis. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1989;13(6):433-54. doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(89)90285-1. PubMed PMID: 2688869.
  35. Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative. 2003 [accessed 2021 Mar 10]. Available from: https://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/.
  36. Single subject epoch (block) auditory fMRI activation data. 2003. Available from: https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/data/auditory/.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 15,285
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 285


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب