LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,124
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,840
Moradi Haghgoo, Janet, Khoshhal, Masoumeh, Sharifi, Shahram, Khodadadi, Iraj, Ghadidmi Pour, Hamidreza, Seif Rabie, Mohammad Ali, Rabienejad, Nazli. (1402). Determination of Osteoblast Cell Viability and Histological Changes of Samples Obtained from Different Implant Drills during Osteotomy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(2), 220-225. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.91439.1579
Janet Moradi Haghgoo; Masoumeh Khoshhal; Shahram Sharifi; Iraj Khodadadi; Hamidreza Ghadidmi Pour; Mohammad Ali Seif Rabie; Nazli Rabienejad. "Determination of Osteoblast Cell Viability and Histological Changes of Samples Obtained from Different Implant Drills during Osteotomy". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, 2, 1402, 220-225. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.91439.1579
Moradi Haghgoo, Janet, Khoshhal, Masoumeh, Sharifi, Shahram, Khodadadi, Iraj, Ghadidmi Pour, Hamidreza, Seif Rabie, Mohammad Ali, Rabienejad, Nazli. (1402). 'Determination of Osteoblast Cell Viability and Histological Changes of Samples Obtained from Different Implant Drills during Osteotomy', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(2), pp. 220-225. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.91439.1579
Moradi Haghgoo, Janet, Khoshhal, Masoumeh, Sharifi, Shahram, Khodadadi, Iraj, Ghadidmi Pour, Hamidreza, Seif Rabie, Mohammad Ali, Rabienejad, Nazli. Determination of Osteoblast Cell Viability and Histological Changes of Samples Obtained from Different Implant Drills during Osteotomy. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 24(2): 220-225. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.91439.1579

Determination of Osteoblast Cell Viability and Histological Changes of Samples Obtained from Different Implant Drills during Osteotomy

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 14، دوره 24، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 79، شهریور 2023، صفحه 220-225    اصل مقاله (320.95 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2022.91439.1579
نویسندگان
Janet Moradi Haghgoo1؛ Masoumeh Khoshhal2؛ Shahram Sharifi2؛ Iraj Khodadadi3؛ Hamidreza Ghadidmi Pour4؛ Mohammad Ali Seif Rabie5؛ Nazli Rabienejad* 1
1Dept. of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
2Periodontist, Hamadan, Iran.
3Dept. of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
4Dept. of Pathology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
5Dept. of Sociable Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: The bone particles collected during osteotomy could be used as autogenous bone graft materials for dental implant surgery. Different factors such as drill design may influence its clinical viability.
Purpose: This study examined the effect of drill design on the osteoblast viability and histopathology parameters of bone collected during the preparation of dental implant site.
Materials and Method: In this experimental study, 90 samples were obtained from three different bone drilling systems including Bego, Implantium, and Dio during fixture installation in patients requiring treatment at the Department of Periodontology, Dentistry University Hamedan. The MTT (3-4,5-Dimethylthiazol2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was used to determine percentage of cell viability. Samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for histological evaluation. Then, they were kept in 10% EDTA solution for 4 weeks for decalcification. The provided slides were evaluated regarding bone structure and osteocytes counts for assessment of viability. Tukey test and SPPS 21 software were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The result showed the viability of osteoblast obtained by Dio (0.45±0.04) was significantly better than Bego (0.37±0.05) and Implantium (0.37±0.04) systems. In histopathological evaluation, the grafting material obtained by Dio presented the best osteoblast morphology.
Conclusion: It might be concluded that drill geometry has significantly influenced the viability of bone particles collected during the preparation of implant sites .Moreover, characteristic geometry alone cannot represent the performance of a particular drill, and several geometric features should be concerned. The results of this study showed that the geometry of the Dio drill was the best considering the viability and histopathological evaluations.

تازه های تحقیق

Janet Moradi Haghgoo Google Scholar

Nazli Rabienejad Google Scholar

کلیدواژه‌ها
Autogenous bone graft؛ Bone collection؛ Particle size؛ Drill geometry
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Nikzad S, Azari A. An introduction to Computer Guided Implantology; literature review, historical background and basic concepts. JDM. 2010; 23: 49-60.
  • Mishra SK, Chowdhary N, Chowdhary R. Dental implants in growing children. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent. 2013; 31: 3-9.
  • Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2009; 24 Suppl: 237-259.
  • Hitti RA, Kerns DG. Guided bone regeneration in the oral cavity: a review. Open Pathol J. 2011; 5: 33-45.
  • Eriksson AR, Albrektson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat -induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosth Dent. 1983; 50: 101-107.
  • Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1999; 14: 127-36.
  • Jianxin D, Xing A. Wear behavior and mechanisms of alumina-based ceramic tools in machining of ferrous and non-ferrous alloys. Tribo Int. 1997; 30: 807-813.
  • Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquère D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau J. A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tool Manufac. 2004; 44: 439-456.
  • Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Lee HJ, Moss ME, Graser GN. The influence of drill wear on cutting efficiency and heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2004; 19: 335-349.
  • Gruber R, Baron M, Busenlechner D, Kandler B, Fuerst G, Watzek G. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of cells from cortical bone cylinders, bone particles from mill, and drilling dust. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official. J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 238-243.
  • Pradel W, Tenbieg P, Lauer G. Influence of harvesting technique and donor site location on in vitro growth of osteoblastlike cells from facial bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2005; 20: 860-866.
  • Queiroz TP, Souza FA, Okamoto R, Margonar R, Pereira-Filho VA, Garcia Júnior IR, et al Evaluation of immediate bone-cell viability and of drill wear after implant osteotomies: immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 1233-1240. 
  • Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Perio. 2002; 29 Suppl 3: 226-231.
  • Reddi AH, Wientroub S, Muthukumaran N. Biologic principles of bone induction. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987; 18: 207-212.
  • Misch CE. Generic root from component terminology in: Misch C. 3rd ed. St Louis: Missouri; 2008. p. 3- 28.
  • Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 1993; 2:158-167.
  • Blay A, Tunchel S, Sendyk WR. Viability of autogenous bone grafts obtained by using bone collectors: histological and microbiological study. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17: 234-240. 
  • Coradazzi LF, Garcia IR Jr, Manfrin TM. Evaluation of autogenous bone grafts, particulate or collected during osteotomy with implant burs: histologic and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 201-207. 
  • Widmark G, Ivanoff CJ. Augmentation of exposed implant threads with autogenous bone chips: prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 2000; 2: 178-183.
  • Pallesen L, Schou S, Aaboe M, Hjorting-Hansen E, Nattestad A, Melsen F. Influence of particle size of autogenous bone grafts on the early stages of bone regeneration: a histologic and stereologic study in rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2002; 17: 498-506.
  • Shapoff CA, Bowers GM, Levy B, Mellonig JT, Yukna RA. The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogeneic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. J Perio. 1980; 51: 625-630.
  • Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965; 150: 893-899. 
  • Park SY, Shin SY, Yang SM, Kye SB. Effect of implant drill design on the particle size of the bone collected during osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 1007-1011.
  • Marzook HAM, Yousef EA, Denewar M, Farahat MRL. In vitro assessment of bone viability with different implant drill speeds. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 58: e301-e306.
  • Bernabeu-Mira JC, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Camacho-Alonso F, Rivas-Ballester R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Low-speed drilling without irrigation versus conventional drilling for dental implant osteotomy preparation: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 4251-4267.
  • Stephenson DA, Agapiou JS. Metal cutting theory and practice. 3rd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2018. p. 156-380.
  • Chen CH, Pei X, Tulu US, Aghvami M, Chen CT, Gaudillière D, et al. A comparative assessment of implant site viability in humans and rats. J Dent Res. 2018; 97:451-459.
  • Pereira CCS, Batista FRS, Jacob RGM, Nogueira LM, Carvalho ACGS, Gealh WC, et al. Comparative evaluation of cell viability immediately after osteotomy for implants with drills and piezosurgery: immunohistochemistry analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29: 1578-1582.
  • Chen CH, Coyac BR, Arioka M, Leahy B, Tulu US, Aghvami M, et al. A novel osteotomy preparation technique to preserve implant site viability and enhance osteogenesis. J Clin Med. 2019; 8: 170.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 776
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 348


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب