LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,113
تعداد مقالات10,208
تعداد مشاهده مقاله40,777,382
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,802,845
Tabrizi, Reza, Mohajerani, Hassan, Moslemi, Hamidreza, Shafiei, Shervin, Majdi, Shobeir. (1402). Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(2), 200-205. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641
Reza Tabrizi; Hassan Mohajerani; Hamidreza Moslemi; Shervin Shafiei; Shobeir Majdi. "Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, 2, 1402, 200-205. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641
Tabrizi, Reza, Mohajerani, Hassan, Moslemi, Hamidreza, Shafiei, Shervin, Majdi, Shobeir. (1402). 'Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(2), pp. 200-205. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641
Tabrizi, Reza, Mohajerani, Hassan, Moslemi, Hamidreza, Shafiei, Shervin, Majdi, Shobeir. Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 24(2): 200-205. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641

Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss in Simultaneous Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Lateral Ramus Bone Block

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 4، دوره 24، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 79، شهریور 2023، صفحه 200-205    اصل مقاله (452.51 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92419.1641
نویسندگان
Reza Tabrizi1؛ Hassan Mohajerani1؛ Hamidreza Moslemi2؛ Shervin Shafiei3؛ Shobeir Majdi* 4
1Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Postgraduate student of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3Postgraduate student of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction may interfere with optimal dental implant placement.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) and thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site in simultaneous versus delayed implant placement following lateral ramus horizontal ridge augmentation in the posterior mandible.
Materials and Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted on patients who required horizontal bone augmentation of the posterior mandible using lateral ramus autogenous bone graft. Patients were divided into two groups of simultaneous implant placement (group 1) and delayed implant placement (group 2). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before augmentation, at the time of implant placement, and 10 months later (6 months after implant loading). MBL and thickness of the buccal aspect were evaluated over time.
Results: There were 18 patients in the group 1 and 16 patients in the group 2. Analysis of the CBCT scans demonstrated that the mean MBL was 1.21±0.35mm in the group 1 and 1.08±0.19mm in the group 2, with no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.19). Thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented site at the time of implant placement was 1.85±0.20mm in the group 1 and 2.16±0.29 mm in the group 2, with a significant difference (p< 0.001). However, data analysis regarding changes in the buccal plate thickness showed no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.36).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference in M-BL and post-operative changes in the thickness of the buccal aspect of the augmented sites with onlay lateral ramus bone blocks between simultaneous and delayed implant placement.

تازه های تحقیق

Reza Tabrizi Google Scholar

Shobeir Majdi Google Scholar

کلیدواژه‌ها
Alveolar ridge augmentation؛ Autogenous bone grafts؛ Dental implants
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 219-237.
  • Tabrizi R, Pourdanesh F, Zare S, Daneste H, Zeini N. Do angulated implants increase the amount of bone loss around implants in the anterior maxilla? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71: 272-277.
  • Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(Suppl): 49-70.
  • Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 173-202.
  • Acocella A, Bertolai R, Colafranceschi M, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometric evaluation of the healing of mandibular ramus bone block grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010; 38: 222-230.
  • Misch CM. Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. Oral Implantol. 2000; 26: 42-49.
  • Gultekin BA, Bedeloglu E, Kose TE, Mijiritsky E. Comparison of bone resorption rates after intraoral block bone and guided bone regeneration augmentation for the reconstruction of horizontally deficient maxillary alveolar ridges. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 16: 4987437.
  • Peñarrocha-Diago M, Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Calvo Guirado JL, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts: simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 846-853.
  • Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M. The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e251.
  • Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single‐tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12‐month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 152-162.
  • Chappuis V, Cavusoglu Y, Buser D, von Arx T. Lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and guided bone regeneration: A 10‐year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 85-96.
  • Cordaro L, Amadè DS, Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 103-111.
  • Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Cho IH, Sennerby L. The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts: a histologic and biomechanic study in the rabbit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 28: 224-231.
  • Boronat A, Carrillo C, Peñarrocha M, Peñarrocha M. Dental implants placed simultaneously with bone grafts in horizontal defects: a clinical retrospective study with 37 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 189-196.
  • Corinaldesi G, Pieri F, Sapigni L, Marchetti C. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: a 3-to 8-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 1119-1128.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 666
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 389


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب