LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,155
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,884
Arab-Nozari, Milad, Zamani, Ehsan, Evazalipour, Mehdi, Soleimani, Banafsheh, Jorbonian, Ali, Nahvi, Azam. (1401). Histocompatibility of Light-Curing Composites Used in Pediatric Dentistry in Human Oral Fibroblast Cells. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(Supplement-March-2023), 112-117. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92358.1631
Milad Arab-Nozari; Ehsan Zamani; Mehdi Evazalipour; Banafsheh Soleimani; Ali Jorbonian; Azam Nahvi. "Histocompatibility of Light-Curing Composites Used in Pediatric Dentistry in Human Oral Fibroblast Cells". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, Supplement-March-2023, 1401, 112-117. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92358.1631
Arab-Nozari, Milad, Zamani, Ehsan, Evazalipour, Mehdi, Soleimani, Banafsheh, Jorbonian, Ali, Nahvi, Azam. (1401). 'Histocompatibility of Light-Curing Composites Used in Pediatric Dentistry in Human Oral Fibroblast Cells', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(Supplement-March-2023), pp. 112-117. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92358.1631
Arab-Nozari, Milad, Zamani, Ehsan, Evazalipour, Mehdi, Soleimani, Banafsheh, Jorbonian, Ali, Nahvi, Azam. Histocompatibility of Light-Curing Composites Used in Pediatric Dentistry in Human Oral Fibroblast Cells. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 24(Supplement-March-2023): 112-117. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92358.1631

Histocompatibility of Light-Curing Composites Used in Pediatric Dentistry in Human Oral Fibroblast Cells

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 5، دوره 24، Supplement-March-2023 - شماره پیاپی 1، خرداد 2023، صفحه 112-117    اصل مقاله (518.17 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92358.1631
نویسندگان
Milad Arab-Nozari1؛ Ehsan Zamani2؛ Mehdi Evazalipour3؛ Banafsheh Soleimani4؛ Ali Jorbonian4؛ Azam Nahvi* 5
1Dept. of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.
2Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
3Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
4Dental Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. Dept. of Pediatrics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
5Dentistry Student, Dental Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Tooth-colored composites are used to repair caries lesions and other dental defects, particularly in anterior regions in children. Although a wide range of composites is using, little attention has been paid to the important indicators such as biological profiles or products released from these materials.
Purpose: The current study aimed to compare the histocompatibility and cytotoxicity of light-curing resin used to repair children's teeth with different brands (3M, DenFil, and Opallis) in curing times of 20 and 40 seconds in human oral fibroblast cells (HGF1).
Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, Three types of flow composites (3M, Opallis, and DenFil), all at A2 shade, were used. The composites were at 4×2mm with separate exposure times of 20 and 40 seconds. MTT test was used to determine the cytotoxicity of composites on oral fibroblast cells. This test is based on the conversion of tetrazolium bromide to a purple compound known as formazan that its color intensity can be evaluated using the ELISA. The higher intensity of the color reveals the higher survival rate of the mitochondria, which indicates less toxicity. One-way variance analysis and unpaired t-test were used to compare the cytotoxicity of each brand in two conditions of 20 and 40 seconds of curing. Statistical significance was considered when p< 0.05.
Results: 3M and Opallis composites were significantly reduced vitality of cells compared to control group in both 20s and 40s curing status. While DenFil brand did not show marked cytotoxicity. In each brand, there are no significant deference between 20s and 40s curing times.
Conclusion: Histocompatibility depends on the type of composite resin. In the current study, DenFil brand showed the highest histocompatibility, followed by 3M and Opallis.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Composite؛ Gingival fibroblast cells؛ MTT test
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Szep S, Kunkel A, Ronge K, Heidemann D. Cytotoxicity of modern dentin adhesives in vitro testing on gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63: 53-60.
  • Hebling J, Giro EMA, de*Souza*Costa CA. Biocompatibility of an adhesive system applied to exposed human dental pulp. J Endo. 1999; 25: 676-682.
  • Yoshii E. Cytotoxic effects of acrylates and methacrylates: relationships of monomer structures and cytotoxicity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997; 37: 517-524.
  • Thompson L, Miller E, Bowles W. Materials science: leaching of unpolymerized materials from orthodontic bonding resin. J Dental Res. 1982; 61: 989-992.
  • De*Souza*Costa CA, Hebling J, Hanks CT. Effects of light-curing time on the cytotoxicity of a restorative resin composite applied to an immortalized odontoblast-cell line. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 365-370.
  • Madhyastha PS, Naik DG, Kotian R, Padma D, Srikant N, Bhat KM. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of silorane and methacrylate based dental composites using human gingival fibroblasts. J Clin Diagnos Res: 2015; 9: ZC05.
  • Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immuno Methods. 1983; 65: 55-63.
  • Ismail N, Ab*Ghani N, Rusli S, Abdullah N, Awang R. Cytotoxicity assessment of zirconia-reinforced experimental nanohybrid dental composite using MTT assay. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol. 2021; 2021: 14878-14886.
  • Bationo R, Rouamba A, Diarra A, Beugré‐Kouassi MLA, Beugré JB, Jordana F. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental and orthodontic light‐cured composite resins. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021; 7: 40-48. 
  • Franz A, König F, Anglmayer M, Rausch-Fan X, Gille G, Rausch WD, et al. Cytotoxic effects of packable and nonpackable dental composites. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 382-392.
  • Tang AT, Liu Y, Björkman L, Ekstrand J. In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding resins on human oral fibroblasts. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop. 1999;116:132-138.
  • Beltrami R, Colombo M, Rizzo K, Di Cristofaro A, Poggio C, Pietrocola G. Cytotoxicity of Different Composite Resins on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Lines. Biomimetics. 2021; 6: 26.
  • Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT, Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosth Dent. 1990; 63: 513-521.
  • Sadeghian S, Nasresfahani MH, Vatani M. In vitro biocompatibility of three orthodontic composite resins on human oral fibroblasts. J Shaeed Sdoughi Univ Med Sci Yazd. 2007; 15: 31-38.
  • Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000; 11: 333-355.
  • Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Invest. 2008; 12: 1-8.
  • Bean TA, Zhuang WC, Tong PY, Eick JD, Chappelow CC, Yourtee DM. Comparison of tetrazolium colorimetric and 51Cr release assays for cytotoxicity determination of dental biomaterials. Dent Mater. 1995; 11: 327-331.
  • Terhune WF, Sydiskis RJ, Davidson WM. In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding materials. Am J Ortho. 1983; 83: 501-506.
  • Tell RT, Sydiskis RJ, Isaacs RD, Davidson WM. Long-term cytotoxicity of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop. 1988; 93: 419-422.
  • Gioka C, Bourauel C, Hiskia A, Kletsas D, Eliades T, Eliades G. Light-cured or chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins? A selection based on the degree of cure, monomer leaching, and cytotoxicity. Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop. 2005; 127: 413-419.
  • Schweikl H, Hiller K-A, Bolay C, Kreissl M, Kreismann W, Nusser A, et al. Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of dental composite materials. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 1713 -1719.
  • Schedle A, Franz A, Rausch-Fan X, Spittler A, Lucas T, Samorapoompichit P, et al. Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements. Dent Mat. 1998; 14: 429-440.
  • Freshney R. Freshney’s Culture of animal cell-a multimedia guide. 8th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: New York; 1999. p. 173-180.
  • Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials-e-book. 13th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences: USA; 2012. p. 245-252.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 718
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 396


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب