LinkedIn

آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها995
تعداد مقالات9,123
تعداد مشاهده مقاله10,702,862
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,167,731
Fayyazi, Anahita, Habibi, Leila, Heidari, Bijan, Tavakolizadeh, Sara. (1401). Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(1), 34-40. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92053.1619
Anahita Fayyazi; Leila Habibi; Bijan Heidari; Sara Tavakolizadeh. "Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, 1, 1401, 34-40. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92053.1619
Fayyazi, Anahita, Habibi, Leila, Heidari, Bijan, Tavakolizadeh, Sara. (1401). 'Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(1), pp. 34-40. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92053.1619
Fayyazi, Anahita, Habibi, Leila, Heidari, Bijan, Tavakolizadeh, Sara. Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 24(1): 34-40. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92053.1619

Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 6، دوره 24، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 78، خرداد 2023، صفحه 34-40  XML اصل مقاله (534.79 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92053.1619
نویسندگان
Anahita Fayyaziorcid 1؛ Leila Habibiorcid 1؛ Bijan Heidariorcid 2؛ Sara Tavakolizadeh email orcid 2
1Post Graduate Student of Prosthodontics, Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Dept. of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: By development of adhesive dentistry and noble mechanical strength of ceramics, reconstruction of posterior teeth with partial coverage restorations such as ceramic endocrowns is possible. Different ceramics may show different mechanical properties which should be investigated.
Purpose: The aim of this experimental in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strength of endocrowns made by CAD-CAM using 3 types of ceramics.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, 30 fresh extracted human molars were prepared to evaluate the tensile bond strength of endocrowns made by IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity, and Vita Enamic blocks (n=10). The specimens were mounted and endodontically treated. Standard preparations were done with 4.5±0.5 mm intracoronal extensions into the pulp chamber and the restorations were designed and milled by CAD-CAM technique. All specimens were cemented with a dual polymerizing resin cement according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were incubated for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 5000 cycles at 5-55°C and underwent the tensile strength test by universal testing machine (UTM). Shapiro-Wilk and one-way ANOVA test were used to statistically analyzed (α= 0.05).
Results: The highest tensile bond strength values were achieved in IPS e.max CAD (216.39 ±22.67N) and Vita Enamic (216.22±17.72N) followed by Vita Suprinity (211.54±20.01N). There was no significant statistical difference between retention of endocrowns made by CAD-CAM technique among ceramic blocks (p= 0.832).
Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, there was no significant difference between retention of endocrowns made by IPS e.max CAD, Vita Enamic, and Vita Suprinity as ceramic blocks. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Tensile bond Strength؛ Dental restoration؛ Ceramics؛ CAD-CAM؛ Resin cement
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Kanat-erturk B, Sariday S, Koseler E, Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD-CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2018; 37: 256-265.
  • El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 201-210.
  • Sun J, Ruan W, He J, Lin X, Ci B, Yin S, et al. Clinical efficacy of different marginal forms of endocrowns: study protocol for a randomized controlled trail. Trials. 2019; 20: 454.
  • Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013; 25: 383-390.
  • Al-Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125: 415.
  • Hassanzadeh M, Sahebi M, Zarrati S, Payaminia L, Alikhasi M. Comparative of evaluation of the internal and marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM endocrowns and crowns fabricated form three different materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34: 341-347.
  • Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Poncet A, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading. Odontology. 2016; 104: 220-232.
  • Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28: 227-235.
  • Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic material, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6: 1742-1755.
  • Sen N, Olcer Us Y. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 593-599.
  • He LH, Swain M. A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 527-534.
  • Zheng Z, He Y, Ruan W, Ling Z, Zheng Ch, Gai Y, et al. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125: 890-899.
  • Bellan MC, Cunha P, Tavares JG, Spohr AM, Mota EG. Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to dentin under different adhesive strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: e109.
  • Homaei E, Farhangdoost K, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Pow EHN. Static and fatigue mechanical behavior of three dental CAD/CAM ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 59: 304-313.
  • Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013; 29: 419-426.
  • El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 575-583.
  • Al-Harbi FA, Ayad NM, Khan ZA, Mahrous AA, Morgano SM. In vitro shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramics to different core materials with the use of three primer/resin cement systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 84-89.
  • Ataol AS, Ergun G. Effects of surface treatments on repair bond strength of a new CAD/CAM ZLS glass ceramic and two different types of CAD/CAM ceramics. J Oral Sci. 2018; 60: 201-211.
  • Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: e147-e162.
  • Mokhtarpour F, Alaghehmand H, Khafri S. Effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics. Electron Physician. 2017; 9: 5487-5493.
  • Puppin-Rontani J, Sundfeld D, Costa AR, Correr AB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Borges GA, et al. Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Concentration and Etching Time on Bond Strength to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 606-615.
  • Lee Y, Kim JH, Woo JS, Yi YA, Hwang JY, Seo DG. Analysis of Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Microshear Bond Strength on Leucite-Reinforced Glass-Ceramic with/without Pure Silane Primer or Universal Adhesive Surface Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 361893.
  • Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016; 35: 796-802.
  • Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater J. 2012; 28: 467-477.
  • Özcan M, Volpato CA. Surface Conditioning Protocol for the Adhesion of Resin-based Materials to Glassy Matrix Ceramics: How to Condition and Why? J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17: 292-293.
  • Kawaguchi A, Matsumoto M, Higashi M, Miura J, Minamino T, Kabetani T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 2: Effect of ultrasonic and acid cleaning. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35: 29-36.
  • Burgess JO, Ghuman T, Cakir D. Self-adhesive resin cements. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010; 22: 412-409.
  • Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements-chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38:295-314.
  • Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013; 79: d140.
  • Jing L, Chen JW, Roggenkamp C, Suprono MS. Effect of crown preparation height on retention of a prefabricated primary posterior zirconia crown. Pediatr Dent. 2019; 41: 229-233.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 137
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 195


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب