LinkedIn

آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها995
تعداد مقالات9,123
تعداد مشاهده مقاله10,702,765
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,167,628
Adibi, Afsoun, Sobhnamayan, Fereshteh, Ostovar Zijerdi, Nazafarin, Tajik, Mohammad, Paknahad, Maryam. (1401). Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(4), 445-451. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91056.1548
Afsoun Adibi; Fereshteh Sobhnamayan; Nazafarin Ostovar Zijerdi; Mohammad Tajik; Maryam Paknahad. "Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23, 4, 1401, 445-451. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91056.1548
Adibi, Afsoun, Sobhnamayan, Fereshteh, Ostovar Zijerdi, Nazafarin, Tajik, Mohammad, Paknahad, Maryam. (1401). 'Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(4), pp. 445-451. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91056.1548
Adibi, Afsoun, Sobhnamayan, Fereshteh, Ostovar Zijerdi, Nazafarin, Tajik, Mohammad, Paknahad, Maryam. Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 23(4): 445-451. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91056.1548

Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 3، دوره 23، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 77، اسفند 2022، صفحه 445-451  XML اصل مقاله (559.21 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91056.1548
نویسندگان
Afsoun Adibiorcid 1؛ Fereshteh Sobhnamayan2؛ Nazafarin Ostovar Zijerdi3؛ Mohammad Tajik4؛ Maryam Paknahad email orcid 5
1Dentist, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
2Dept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
3Student of Research Committee, Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
4Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
5Oral and Dental Disease Research Center Dept. of Oral and maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Perforation within external root resorption (ERR) lesions dramatically affects the prognosis of the involved roots. Failure to diagnose perforation undermines treatment; therefore, early detection of these lesions is of great importance. The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and electronic apex locators (EAL) are reliably used to detect root perforations.
Purpose: In this in vitro study, we compared the EAL findings with the results obtained by the CBCT images for the detection of perforations within ERR lesions.
Materials and Method: This cross sectional study included 160 extracted anterior human teeth. The teeth were categorized into four groups including teeth with intact root, teeth with ERR, teeth with ERR and 0.5 mm perforation, and teeth with ERR with 1 mm perforation. The presence of perforations was compared by CBCT images and root EAL.
Results: The sensitivity of CBCT scans in detecting 0.5 mm and 1 mm root perforations was 100% and 97.5%, respectively, while the sensitivity of the EAL was 10% and 27.5% in detecting 0.5 mm and 1 mm root perforations, respectively( with the ±0.5mm range of error). For detecting intact and teeth with ERR, the specificity of CBCT scans was 100% and 95%, respectively, and for EAL, it was 100% for both. Poor agreement was found between the two techniques (kappa=-0.025).
Conclusion: CBCT scans were more sensitive and specific than EAL scans for detecting perforations in non-obturated root canals in this study. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography؛ Dental pulp cavity؛ Tooth Preparation؛ Tooth Resorption
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Maseratt V, Ebrahimi HS, Saberi EA, Pirhaji A, Khosravil N. Diagnostic accuracy of two cone-beam computed tomography systems for detection of strip perforation in the mesial root of mandibular molars. G Ital Endod. 2020; 34: 63-68.
  • Shokri A, Eskandarloo A, Noruzi-Gangachin M, Khajeh S. Detection of root perforations using conventional and digital intraoral radiography, multidetector computed mography and cone beam computed tomography. Rest Dent Endod. 2015; 40: 58-67.
  • Haghanifar S, Moudi E, Mesgarani A, Bijani A, Abbaszadeh N. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography in detecting mandibular molars root perforations. Imag Sci Dent. 2014; 44: 115.
  • Corrêa ACP, Silva EJNLd, Ferreira CMA, Magalhães KM, Coutinho-Filho TdS. Efficacy of apex locators in the identification of different diameters perforations. RFO UPF. 2011; 16: 161-165.
  • Kaufman A, Fuss Z, Keila S, Waxenberg S. Reliability of different electronic apex locators to detect root perforations in vitro. Int Endo J. 1997; 30: 403-407.
  • Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus Dimensions Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2017; 62: 395-398.
  • Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Abbaszade H. Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types. J Orofac Orthop. 2016; 77: 350-356.
  • D'Assunção FLC, Sousa JCN, Felinto KCA, de*Medeiros TC, Leite DT, de*Lucena RB, et al. Accuracy and repeatability of 3 apex locators in locating root canal perforations: an ex vivo J Endo. 2014; 40: 1241-1244.
  • Marroquín BB, Fernández CC, Schmidtmann I, Willershausen B, Goldberg F. Accuracy of electronic apex locators to detect root canal perforations with inserted metallic posts: an ex vivo Head Face Med. 2014;10: 1-5.
  • Ren H, Chen J, Deng F, Zheng L, Liu X, Dong Y. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013;83:189-195.
  • Lima T, Gamba TdO, Zaia AA, Soares AdJ. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of root resorption. Australian Dent J. 2016; 61: 425-431.
  • Khojastepour L, Moazami F, Babaei M, Forghani M. Assessment of root perforation within simulated internal resorption cavities using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endo. 2015; 41: 1520-1523.
  • Eskandarloo A, Mirshekari A, Poorolajal J, Mohammadi Z, Shokri A. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radio. 2012; 114: e54-e61.
  • Tsesis I, Rosenberg E, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Katz M, Rosen E. Prevalence and associated periodontal status of teeth with root perforation: a retrospective study of 2,002 patients' medical records. J Endo. 2010; 36: 797-800.
  • Afkhami F, Ghoncheh Z, Khadiv F, Kaviani H, Shamshiri AR. How Does Voxel Size of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Effect Accurate Detection of Root Strip Perforations. Iran Endo J. 2021; 16: 43-48.
  • Takeshita WM, Chicarelli M, Iwaki LCV. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography. Indian J Dent Res. 2015; 26: 619.
  • Alves RAA, Souza JB, Alencar AHG, Pécora JD, Estrela C. Detection of procedural errors with stainless steel and NiTi instruments by undergraduate students using conventional radiograph and cone beam computed tomography. Iranian Endo J. 2013; 8: 160.
  • Shemesh H, Cristescu RC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endo. 2011; 37: 513-516.
  • Tsesis I, Fuss Z. Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root perforations. Endo Top. 2006; 13: 95-107.
  • Kamburoğlu K, Yeta EN, Yılmaz F. An ex vivo comparison of diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the detection of furcal perforations. J Endo. 2015; 41: 696-702.
  • Adel M, Tofangchiha M, Yeganeh LAB, Javadi A, Khojasteh AA, Majd NM. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography in detecting strip root perforations. J Int Oral Health. 2016; 8: 75.
  • Bechara B, Alex*McMahan C, Moore W, Noujeim M, Teixeira F, Geha H. Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radio. 2013; 42: 20120245.
  • Tanimoto H, Arai Y. The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radio. 2009; 25: 149-153.
  • Marroquín BB, Fernández CC, Schmidtmann I, Willershausen B, Goldberg F. Accuracy of electronic apex locators to detect root canal perforations with inserted metallic posts: an ex vivo Head face Med. 2014; 10: 57.
  • Venskutonis T, Juodzbalys G, Nackaerts O, Mickevicienė L. Influence of voxel size on the diagnostic ability of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate simulated root perforations. Oral Radio. 2013; 29: 151-159.
  • Da*Silveira P, Fontana M, Oliveira H, Vizzotto M, Montagner F, Silveira H, et al. CBCT‐based volume of simulated root resorption–influence of FOV and voxel size. Int Endo J. 2015; 48: 959-965.
  • Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho. 1971; 32: 271-275.
  • Shin HS, Yang WK, Kim MR, Ko HJ, Cho KM, Park SH, et al. Accuracy of Root ZX in teeth with simulated root perforation in the presence of gel or liquid type endodontic irrigant. Rest Dent Endo. 2012; 37: 149-154.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 297
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 265


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب