LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,995
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,369,605
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,277,223
Hesami, Samaneh, Ghasemi, Davood, Shahriari, Shahriar. (1401). Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(4), 438-444. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91093.1558
Samaneh Hesami; Davood Ghasemi; Shahriar Shahriari. "Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23, 4, 1401, 438-444. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91093.1558
Hesami, Samaneh, Ghasemi, Davood, Shahriari, Shahriar. (1401). 'Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(4), pp. 438-444. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91093.1558
Hesami, Samaneh, Ghasemi, Davood, Shahriari, Shahriar. Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 23(4): 438-444. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91093.1558

Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 2، دوره 23، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 77، اسفند 2022، صفحه 438-444    اصل مقاله (503.08 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2021.91093.1558
نویسندگان
Samaneh Hesami1؛ Davood Ghasemi* 2؛ Shahriar Shahriari3
1Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
3Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Sealants are placed to prevent carious lesion initiation and to arrest caries progression by providing a physical barrier that inhibits microorganisms and food particles from collecting in pit and fissures .The two most common materials used for sealing pits and fissures are resins and glass-ionomers. Ionoseal is a light curing GI composite cement.The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength and microleakage of Ionoseal with different surface pretreatment.

Materials and Methods:This in vitro ,an experimental study was conducted on 95 sound human premolar in 5 groups(in each group 5 teeth for microtensile test and 14 teeth for microleakage test).A :35% phosphoric acid + total etch adhesive + Ionoseal ,B :universal adhesive + Ionoseal ,C: 35% phosphoric acid + Ionoseal,D: Ionoseal, E: 35% phosphoric acid + Embrace fissure sealant. On the prepared buccal enamel of each tooth, a 5 mm block of the sealing material was created and underwent thermocycling .By serially cutting, specimens about1×1mm in cross section were obtained and loaded in tensile (0.5 mm/min) until failure occurred .For microleakage test,sealing material was placed into the prepared occlusal fissures and teeth were thermocycled and then immersed in methylene blue 5% .An incision was made buccolingually. The dye penetration rate was measured based on Williams and winter criteria under stereomicroscope.

Results: Mean microtensile bond strength was significantly different between groups (P
کلیدواژه‌ها
Fissure sealant؛ Composite؛ Microleakage
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, Mabry TR, Townsend JA, Wells M. Pediatric dentistry : infancy through adolescence. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 461-462.
  • McMurphy A, Xu X, Fournier S, Cehreli ZC, Sherman K, Tremmel C, et al. Effect of cured versus uncured adhesive inclusion on the microtensile bond strength of sealants. J Dent Child. 2017; 84: 58-64.
  • Haznedaroğlu E, Güner Ş, Duman C, Menteş A. A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:532-538.
  • Jumanca D, Galuscan A, Popescu LA, Ghiorghe A, Andrian S, Sinescu C. Comparative study on available sealing materials. Rev Chim(Bucharest). 2016;67:241-244.
  • Almuhaiza M. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry: a critical appraisal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17: 331-336.
  • Khodadadi E, GhAhmadi Zenouz G, Pachenari N, Khafri S. Comparative evaluation of surface hardness of different resin-modified glass ionomers and a compomer. J Dentomaxillofac Radiol Pathol Surg. 1970;4: 1-9.
  • Nahvi A, Razavian A, Abedi H, Charati JY. A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. Eur J Dent. 2018; 12: 242-246.
  • Pouyanfar H, Tabaii ES, Aghazadeh S, Nobari SPTN, Imani MM. Microtensile bond strength of composite to enamel using universal adhesive with/without acid etching compared to etch and rinse and self-etch bonding agents. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6: 2186-2192.
  • Ak AT, Alpoz AR. Effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of three different pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11: 93-96.
  • Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent. 2005; 33: 459-467.
  • Feigal R, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 1850-1856.
  • Autio-Gold J. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 325-329.
  • Bagheri M, Pilecki P, Sauro S, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Hosey MT. An in vitro investigation of pre‐treatment effects before fissure sealing. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 27: 514-522.
  • Panigrahi A, Srilatha K, Panigrahi RG, Mohanty S, Bhuyan SK, Bardhan D. Microtensile bond strength of embrace wetbond hydrophilic sealant in different moisture contamination: an in vitro J Clin Diag Res. 2015; 9: ZC23-ZC25.
  • Hannig M, Gräfe A, Atalay S, Bott B. Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. J Dent. 2004; 32: 75-81.
  • Khodadadi E, Esmaeili B, Karimian N, Khafri S. Evaluation of microleakage of Ionoseal filling material as a fissure sealant agent. Caspian J Dent Res. 2014; 3: 39-45.
  • Ludlow S, Farmer S, Donaldson M, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations with selective enamel etching. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: E154-E159.
  • Urquía*Morales MdC, Brasca N, Girardi M, Bonnin C, Ríos M. In vitro study of microleakage of fissure sealant with different previous treatments. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2011; 24: 150-154.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 737
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 494


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب