LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,095
تعداد مقالات10,041
تعداد مشاهده مقاله27,977,040
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,793,158
Yarelahi, Mahsa, Pirzadeh, Nasim, Nazari, Mahin, Asadollahi, Abdolrahim. (1401). Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, and Cut-Off Points of Persian Version of Widowhood Resilience Scale (WRS, 25-Items) among Iranian Widows. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(4), 480-487. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2021.91999.1277
Mahsa Yarelahi; Nasim Pirzadeh; Mahin Nazari; Abdolrahim Asadollahi. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, and Cut-Off Points of Persian Version of Widowhood Resilience Scale (WRS, 25-Items) among Iranian Widows". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10, 4, 1401, 480-487. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2021.91999.1277
Yarelahi, Mahsa, Pirzadeh, Nasim, Nazari, Mahin, Asadollahi, Abdolrahim. (1401). 'Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, and Cut-Off Points of Persian Version of Widowhood Resilience Scale (WRS, 25-Items) among Iranian Widows', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 10(4), pp. 480-487. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2021.91999.1277
Yarelahi, Mahsa, Pirzadeh, Nasim, Nazari, Mahin, Asadollahi, Abdolrahim. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, and Cut-Off Points of Persian Version of Widowhood Resilience Scale (WRS, 25-Items) among Iranian Widows. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 10(4): 480-487. doi: 10.30476/jhsss.2021.91999.1277

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, Reliability, and Cut-Off Points of Persian Version of Widowhood Resilience Scale (WRS, 25-Items) among Iranian Widows

Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System
دوره 10، شماره 4، دی 2022، صفحه 480-487    اصل مقاله (877.74 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/jhsss.2021.91999.1277
نویسندگان
Mahsa Yarelahi1، 2؛ Nasim Pirzadeh2؛ Mahin Nazari3؛ Abdolrahim Asadollahi* 4، 5
1Department of Gerontology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Health Promotion and Gerontology, Faculty of Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4Department of Health Promotion and Gerontology, Faculty of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5Middle East Longevity Institute in Abyad Medical Centre, Azmi Street, Abdo Center, Tripoli, Lebanon
چکیده
Background: Widowhood is an unwonted stage after married life accompanied by emotional and physical stress. Resilience plays an important role in coping with widowhood, but there is no appropriate instrument to help measure resilience among the Iranian population. Hence, the objective of the present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the widowhood resilience scale (WRS, 25-Items).
Methods: In a psychometric study, 352 Iranian widows were randomly selected; then, the WRS, Loneliness, general resilience, and demographic questionnaire were used to gather data. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to extract the factors using IBM-SPSS version 24 and AMOS version 24.
Results: The mean ages of 352 participants were 65.7±9.8, and the highest frequency of education level was no formal schooling (42.6%). The construct validity of WRS based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the six subscales explained a total of 85.35 % of the variance. The convergent validity of the WRS 25-items was compared to Iranian versions of UCLA-Loneliness (0.71) and CD‐RISC (0.78) as well (P<0.01). The WRS scale demonstrated excellent reliability and Cronbach’s alpha obtained 0.94 for the entire scale (P<0.001). The optimal cut-off point that best differentiates between resilient and non-resilient widows was 55, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 74.4%.
Conclusion: Based on the results, the Persian version of the WRS is a valid and reliable tool that can be utilized to measure widows’ resilience. However, further investigations are suggested.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Middle Aged, Psychological, Psychometrics, Resilience, Widowhood؛  
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Khosravan S, Salehi S, Ahmadi F, Mansoorian MR. The experience of widowed head of the family during role transition: A qualitative study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2013;2(1):62-75.
  2. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of psychosomatic research. 1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4
  3. O’Rourke N. Psychological resilience and the well-being of widowed women. Ageing International. 2004;29(3):267-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-996-1002-x
  4. Bennett KM, Morselli D, Spahni S, Perrig-Chiello P. Trajectories of resilience among widows: a latent transition model. Aging & Mental Health. 2019:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1647129
  5. Bennett KM, Soulsby LK. Wellbeing in bereavement and widowhood. Illness, Crisis & Loss. 2012;20(4):321-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/IL.20.4.b
  6. Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Nesse RM. Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and aging. 2004;19(2):260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.260
  7. Schaefer JA, Moos RH. Bereavement experiences and personal growth. Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 145-67. DOI: 10.1037/10436-006
  8. Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Lehman DR, Tweed RG, Haring M, Sonnega J, et al. Resilience to loss and chronic grief: a prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002;83(5):1150. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1150
  9. Kessler RC, Price RH, Wortman CB. Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology. 1985;36:531-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002531.
  10. Hendrickson ZM, Kim J, Tol WA, Shrestha A, Kafle HM, Luitel NP, et al. Resilience among Nepali widows after the death of a spouse:“That was my past and now I have to see my present”. Qualitative health research. 2018;28(3):466-78. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317739265
  11. Mohammed E. Resilience of Nigerian Widows in the Face of Harmful Widowhood Practices in Southwest Nigeria: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. 2018.
  12. West CL, Dreeben SJ, Busing K. The Development of the Widowhood Resilience Scale. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. 2019 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222819873489
  13. Alikarami K, Maleki A, Abdollahyan H, Rezaei M. Phenomenology of the lived Experiences of Lonely aged Women from Abandonment and Rejection. Social Welfare. 2021;21(80):231-60. http://dx.doi.org/1037/10436-006
  14. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015.
  15. Hintze J. PASS 11. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. 2011.
  16. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/da.10113
  17. Asadollahi A, Bahadori F, Arastoo A. Effectiveness of group logo therapy on life expectancy & loneliness of minority aged community in Southwest Iran. MOJ Gerontol Ger. 2017;2(3):237-9. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojgg.2017.02.00049
  18. Ahangarzadeh Rezaei S, Rasouli M. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF" CONNER-DAVIDSON RESILIENCE SCALE" IN ADOLESCENTS WITH CANCER. The Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty. 2015;13(9):739-47. URL: http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-2369-en.html
  19. SPSS for Windows 24.0 [Computer software]. (2016). Chicago ISI.
  20. AMOS for Windows 24.0 [Computer software]. (2016). Chicago ISI.
  21. Furr M. Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011. ISBN: 9781446287866. https://doi.org/4135/9781446287866.
  22. Anders Kallner F, in Anders Kallner, ed. Laboratory Statistics (Second Edition). Elsevier. 2018:1-140ISBN:9780124169715
  23. Stevens J, Stevens J. Chapter 11. exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 1986:385-470.
  24. Santos JRA. Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of extension. 1999;37(2):1-5. https://www.joe.org/joe/1999april/tt3.php?vm=r
  25. King BM, Carr DC, Taylor MG. Depressive symptoms and the buffering effect of resilience on widowhood by gender. The Gerontologist. 2019;59(6):1122-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny115.
  26. Powers SM, Bisconti TL, Bergeman C. Trajectories of social support and well-being across the first two years of widowhood. Death studies. 2014;38(8):499-509. .https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2013.846436
  27. Todd JL, Worell J. Resilience in low‐income, employed, African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2000;24(2):119-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00192.x
  28. Satici SA. Psychological vulnerability, resilience, and subjective well-being: The mediating role of hope. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;102:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.057
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 621
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 418


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب