LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,116
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,832
Gharechahi, Maryam, Moezzi, Shaghayegh, Karimpour, Sahar. (1401). Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(1), 60-65. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.90785.1522
Maryam Gharechahi; Shaghayegh Moezzi; Sahar Karimpour. "Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24, 1, 1401, 60-65. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.90785.1522
Gharechahi, Maryam, Moezzi, Shaghayegh, Karimpour, Sahar. (1401). 'Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 24(1), pp. 60-65. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.90785.1522
Gharechahi, Maryam, Moezzi, Shaghayegh, Karimpour, Sahar. Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 24(1): 60-65. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.90785.1522

Comparative Analysis of Stress Distribution through Finite-Element Models of 3 NiTi Endodontic Instruments while Operating in Different Canal Types

Journal of Dentistry
مقاله 14، دوره 24، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 78، خرداد 2023، صفحه 60-65    اصل مقاله (707.59 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30476/dentjods.2022.90785.1522
نویسندگان
Maryam Gharechahi1؛ Shaghayegh Moezzi2؛ Sahar Karimpour* 2
1Dept. of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2Dentist, Private practice, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده
Statement of the Problem: Distribution of stress along endodontic instruments determines their fracture resistance during instrumentation of root canals. The cross-sectional design of instruments and root canal anatomy are of the most important factors affecting the stress distribution.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in different cross-sectional design of nickel-titanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments operating in different canal anatomies using finite element analysis (FEA).
Materials and Method: In this original finite element analysis study, 3-dimensional models of convex triangle (CT), S-type (S), and triple-helix (TH) cross-sectional designs with the size of 25/04 simulated rotational movements through 45ᵒ and 60ᵒ angled root canals with 2- and 5-mm radii using ABAQUS software. The stress distribution was evaluated by the means of FEA.
Results: CT showed the lowest stress values followed by the TH and S ones. The most stress concentration was detected in the CT apical third while, TH revealed better stress distribution all along its length. 45ᵒ curvature angle and 5-mm radius applied the lowest stress to the instruments.
Conclusion: Higher value of radius and smaller curvature angle apply lower stress values to the instrument. CT design shows the lowest stress level with the most stress concentration in its apical third while the triple-helix design has a better stress distribution. Thus, it is safer to use convex triangular cross-section mostly for coronal and middle thirds in initial steps of shaping and triple-helix for the apical third in final steps.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Endodontics؛ Finite element analysis؛ Root canal preparation؛ Stress analysis
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  • Arbab-Chirani R, Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani S, Calloch S. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending behavior through finite-element models of 5 Ni–Ti endodontic instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111: 115-121.
  • Basheer*Ahamed SB, Vanajassun PP, Rajkumar K, Mahalaxmi S. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution in experimentally designed Nickel-titanium rotary files with varying cross sections: A Finite Element Analysis. J Endod. 2018; 44: 654-658.
  • Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006; 32: 1031-143.
  • Averbach RE, Kleier DJ. Endodontics in the 21st century: the rotary revolution. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22: 27-30.
  • Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Versluis A. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 593-602.
  • Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod. 2000; 26: 414-417.
  • Xu X, Eng M, Zheng Y, Eng D. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod. 2006; 32: 372-375.
  • Inan U, Aydin C. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments designed for retreatment. J Endod. 2012; 38: 108-111.
  • Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104: 837-340.
  • Nguyen HH, Fong H, Paranjpe A, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Peters OA. Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and Vortex Blue rotary instruments. J Endod.2014;40:1190-1193.
  • Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de*la*Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1477-1481.
  • Versluis A, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim BM, Lee CJ. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. J Endod. 2012; 38: 1399-1403.
  • Cheung G, Peng B, Bian Z, Shen Y, Darvell B. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination. Int Endod J. 2005; 38: 802-809.
  • Srirekha A, Bashetty K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2010; 21: 425.
  • Medha A, Patil S, Hoshing U, Bandekar S. Evaluation of Forces Generated on Three Different Rotary File Systems in Apical Third of Root Canal using Finite Element Analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: 243-246.
  • Necchi S, Taschieri S, Petrini L, Migliavacca F. Mechanical behaviour of nickel‐titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 939-949.
  • Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod. 2003; 29: 15-19.
  • Zhang EW, Cheung GS, Zheng YF. Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1394-1398.
  • Grande N, Plotino G, Pecci R, Bedini R, Malagnino V, Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three‐ dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel- titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 755-763.
  • Kim HC, Cheung GS, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Kang SI. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. J Endod. 2008; 34: 743-747.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 744
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 689


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب