LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,040
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,711
Gholam, Milad, Choobineh, Alireza, Karimi, Mohammad Taghi, Dehghan, Azizallah, Abdoli- Eramaki, Mohammad. (1402). Investigating Glenohumeral Joint Contact Forces and Kinematics in Different Keyboard and Monitor Setups using Opensim. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), 281-290. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1450
Milad Gholam; Alireza Choobineh; Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Azizallah Dehghan; Mohammad Abdoli- Eramaki. "Investigating Glenohumeral Joint Contact Forces and Kinematics in Different Keyboard and Monitor Setups using Opensim". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 3, 1402, 281-290. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1450
Gholam, Milad, Choobineh, Alireza, Karimi, Mohammad Taghi, Dehghan, Azizallah, Abdoli- Eramaki, Mohammad. (1402). 'Investigating Glenohumeral Joint Contact Forces and Kinematics in Different Keyboard and Monitor Setups using Opensim', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(3), pp. 281-290. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1450
Gholam, Milad, Choobineh, Alireza, Karimi, Mohammad Taghi, Dehghan, Azizallah, Abdoli- Eramaki, Mohammad. Investigating Glenohumeral Joint Contact Forces and Kinematics in Different Keyboard and Monitor Setups using Opensim. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(3): 281-290. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1450

Investigating Glenohumeral Joint Contact Forces and Kinematics in Different Keyboard and Monitor Setups using Opensim

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 13، شماره 3، شهریور 2023، صفحه 281-290    اصل مقاله (1.12 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2210-1450
نویسندگان
Milad Gholam1؛ Alireza Choobineh2؛ Mohammad Taghi Karimi3؛ Azizallah Dehghan4؛ Mohammad Abdoli- Eramaki* 5
1Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
5School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
چکیده
Background: The musculoskeletal complaints of the shoulder are prevalent in people who work with computers for a long time.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the glenohumeral joint contact forces and kinematics in different keyboards and monitor setups using OpenSim.
Material and Methods: Twelve randomly selected healthy males participated in an experimental study. A 3×3 factorial design was used in which three angles were considered for the monitor and three horizontal distances for the keyboard while performing standard tasks. The workstation was adjusted based on ANSI/HFES-100-2007 standard to maintain a comfortable ergonomic posture for controlling confounding variables. Qualisys motion capture system and OpenSim were used.
Results: The maximum mean range of motion (ROM) of both shoulders’ flexion and adduction was observed when the keyboard was 15 cm from the edge of the desk, and the monitor angle was 30°. The maximum mean ROM of both shoulders’ internal rotation was recorded for the keyboard at the edge of the desk. Peak forces for most right shoulder complex muscles were obtained in two setups. 3D shoulder joint moments were significantly different among nine setups (P-value<0.05). The peak anteroposterior and mediolateral joint contact forces were recorded for the keyboard at 15 cm and the monitor at zero angles (0.751 and 0.780 N/BW, respectively). The peak vertical joint contact force was observed for the keyboard at 15 cm and the monitor at 15° (0.310 N/BW). 
Conclusion: The glenohumeral joint contact forces are minimum for the keyboard at 8 cm and the monitor at zero angles.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Biomechanics؛ Shoulder؛ Musculoskeletal Disorders؛ Ergonomics
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Kashif M, Anwar M, Noor H, Iram H, Hassan HMJ. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Complaints of Arm, Neck and Shoulder and Associated Risk Factors in Computer Office Workers. Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2020;30(5):299-305. doi: 10.1055/a-1126-4515.
  2. Faryza E, Murad MS, Anwar S. A study of work related complaints of arm, neck and shoulder (CANS) among office workers in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian J Public Health Med. 2015;15:8-16.
  3. Nakphet N, Chaikumarn M, Janwantanakul P. Effect of different types of rest-break interventions on neck and shoulder muscle activity, perceived discomfort and productivity in symptomatic VDU operators: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(2):339-53. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077048. PubMed PMID: 24934429.
  4. Eltayeb S, Staal JB, Hassan A, De Bie RA. Work related risk factors for neck, shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among Dutch computer office workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):315. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9196-x. PubMed PMID: 19685174. PubMed PMCID: PMC2775111.
  5. Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz DJ, Gentry E, Cohen S, et al. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41(4):236-49. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10067. PubMed PMID: 11920967.
  6. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders among computer users: lesson learned from the role of posture and keyboard use. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.014. PubMed PMID: 14759747.
  7. Delisle A, Larivière C, Plamondon A, Imbeau D. Comparison of three computer office workstations offering forearm support: impact on upper limb posture and muscle activation. 2006;49(2):139-60. doi: 10.1080/10610270500450739. PubMed PMID: 16484142.
  8. Xu X, Robertson M, Chen KB, Lin J-h, McGorry RW. Using the Microsoft Kinect™ to assess 3-D shoulder kinematics during computer use. Appl Ergon. 2017;65:418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.004. PubMed PMID: 28395854.
  9. Sasikumar V, Binoosh SCAb. A model for predicting the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among computer professionals. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(2):384-96. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1480583. PubMed PMID: 29792570.
  10. Saul KR, Hu X, Goehler CM, Vidt ME, Daly M, Velisar A, et al. Benchmarking of dynamic simulation predictions in two software platforms using an upper limb musculoskeletal model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18(13):1445-58. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2014.916698. PubMed PMID: 24995410. PubMed PMCID: PMC4282829.
  11. Seth A, Hicks JL, Uchida TK, Habib A, Dembia CL, Dunne JJ, et al. OpenSim: Simulating musculo-skeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(7):e1006223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223. PubMed PMID: 30048444. PubMed PMCID: PMC6061994.
  12. Chang J, Chablat D, Bennis F, Ma L. Using 3D Scan to Determine Human Body Segment Mass in OpenSim Model. International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management; Springer; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91397-1_3.
  13. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, et al. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(11):1940-50. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901024. PubMed PMID: 18018689
  14. Rajagopal A, Dembia CL, DeMers MS, Delp DD, Hicks JL, Delp SL. Full-body musculoskeletal model for muscle-driven simulation of human gait. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63(10):2068-79. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2586891. PubMed PMID: 27392337. PubMed PMCID: PMC5507211.
  15. Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations. ANSI/HFES 100-2007; Santa Mon-ica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2007.
  16. Van Sint Jan S. Color Atlas of Skeletal Landmark Definitions: Guidelines for Reproducible Manual and Virtual Palpations. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
  17. Kotani K, Barrero LH, Lee DL, Dennerlein JT. Effect of horizontal position of the computer keyboard on upper extremity posture and muscular load during computer work. Ergonomics. 2007;50(9):1419-32. doi: 10.1080/00140130701330587. PubMed PMID: 17654034.
  18. Gustafsson E, Hagberg M. Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. Appl Ergon. 2003;34(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00005-X. PubMed PMID: 12628567.
  19. Harari Y, Bechar A, Riemer R. Workers’ biomechanical loads and kinematics during multiple-task manual material handling. Appl Ergon. 2020;83:102985. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102985. PubMed PMID: 31698226.
  20. Reinbolt JA, Seth A, Delp SL. Simulation of human movement: applications using OpenSim. Procedia IUTAM. 2011;2:186-98. doi: 10.1016/j.piutam.2011.04.019.
  21. Shahabpoor E, Pavic A. Measurement of Walking Ground Reactions in Real-Life Environments: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies. Sensors (Basel). 2017;17(9):2085. doi: 10.3390/s17092085. PubMed PMID: 28895909. PubMed PMCID: PMC5620730.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 19,862
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 413


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب