LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,089
تعداد مقالات9,995
تعداد مشاهده مقاله26,456,425
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله7,289,170
Sharifzadeh Javidi, Sam, Shirazinodeh, Alireza, Saligheh Rad, Hamidreza. (1402). Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Quantification Dependent on Measurement SNR and Tissue Perfusion: A Simulation Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(6), 555-562. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2102-1281
Sam Sharifzadeh Javidi; Alireza Shirazinodeh; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad. "Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Quantification Dependent on Measurement SNR and Tissue Perfusion: A Simulation Study". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 6, 1402, 555-562. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2102-1281
Sharifzadeh Javidi, Sam, Shirazinodeh, Alireza, Saligheh Rad, Hamidreza. (1402). 'Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Quantification Dependent on Measurement SNR and Tissue Perfusion: A Simulation Study', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(6), pp. 555-562. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2102-1281
Sharifzadeh Javidi, Sam, Shirazinodeh, Alireza, Saligheh Rad, Hamidreza. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Quantification Dependent on Measurement SNR and Tissue Perfusion: A Simulation Study. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(6): 555-562. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2102-1281

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Quantification Dependent on Measurement SNR and Tissue Perfusion: A Simulation Study

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
مقاله 7، دوره 13، شماره 6، بهمن و اسفند 2023، صفحه 555-562    اصل مقاله (1.1 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2102-1281
نویسندگان
Sam Sharifzadeh Javidi1، 2؛ Alireza Shirazinodeh1؛ Hamidreza Saligheh Rad* 1، 2
1Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medicine School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Quantitative Medical Imaging Systems Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model extracts both functional and structural information of a tissue using motion-sensitizing gradients.
Objective: The Objective of the present work is to investigate the impact of signal to noise ratio (SNR) and physiologic conditions on the validity of IVIM parameters.
Material and Methods: This study is a simulation study, modeling IVIM at a voxel, and also done 10,000 times for every single simulation. Complex noises with various standard deviations were added to signal in-silico to investigate SNR effects on output validity. Besides, some blood perfusion situations for different tissues were considered based on their physiological range to explore the impacts of blood fraction at each voxel on the validity of the IVIM outputs. Coefficient variation (CV) and bias of the estimations were computed to assess the validity of the IVIM parameters.
Results: This study has shown that the validity of IVIM output parameters highly depends on measurement SNR and physiologic characteristics of the studied organ.  
Conclusion: IVIM imaging could be useful if imaging parameters are correctly selected for each specific organ, considering hardware limitations.

تازه های تحقیق

Hamidreza Saligheh Rad (Google Scholar)

کلیدواژه‌ها
Reproducibility of Results؛ Diffusion-Weighted Imaging؛ Perfusion Imaging؛ Intravoxel Incoherent Motion؛ SNR؛ Magnetic Resonance Imaging
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1965;42(1):288-92. doi: 10.1063/1.1695690.
  2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, et al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. 1986;161(2):401-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909. PubMed PMID: 3763909.
  3. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. 1988;168(2):497-505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671. PubMed PMID: 3393671.
  4. Le Bihan D. What can we see with IVIM MRI? 2019;187:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.062. PubMed PMID: 29277647.
  5. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, Tran Van Nhieu J, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging—pilot study. Radiology. 2008;249(3):891-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080080. PubMed PMID: 19011186.
  6. Federau C, Nguyen A, Christensen S, Saba L, Wintermark M. Cerebral perfusion measurement in brain death with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Neurovascular Imaging. 2016;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.1186/s40809-016-0020-7.
  7. Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sano K, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: alterations in diffusion and perfusion in patients with renal dysfunction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(3):414-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.004. PubMed PMID: 23102943.
  8. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, Finn M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011;65(5):1437-47. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22740. PubMed PMID: 21287591. PubMed PMCID: 4692245.
  9. Cheng ZY, Feng YZ, Hu JJ, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: The application in patients with hyperuricemia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(3):833-40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26861. PubMed PMID: 31318112.
  10. Beyhan M, Sade R, Koc E, Adanur S, Kantarci M. The evaluation of prostate lesions with IVIM DWI and MR perfusion parameters at 3T MRI. Radiol Med. 2019;124(2):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0930-3. PubMed PMID: 30276599.
  11. Bihan DL, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn Reson Med. 1992;27(1):171-8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910270116. PubMed PMID: 1435202.
  12. Lee EY, Hui ES, Chan KK, Tse KY, Kwong WK, Chang TY, Chan Q, Khong PL. Relationship between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tissue perfusion of cervical cancers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(2):454-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24808. PubMed PMID: 25413245.
  13. Federau C, O’Brien K, Meuli R, Hagmann P, Maeder P. Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): initial clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(3):624-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24195. PubMed PMID: 24068649.
  14. Lin Y, Li J, Zhang Z, Xu Q, Zhou Z, et al. Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging and arterial spin labeling MR imaging in gliomas. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:234245. doi: 10.1155/2015/234245. PubMed PMID: 25945328. PubMed PMCID: 4402183.
  15. Stieb S, Boss A, Wurnig MC, et al. Non-parametric intravoxel incoherent motion analysis in patients with intracranial lesions: test-retest reliability and correlation with arterial spin labeling. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;11:780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.05.022. PubMed PMID: 27354956. PubMed PMCID: 4910187.
  16. Le Bihan D. Diffusion, confusion and functional MRI. 2012;62(2):1131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.058. PubMed PMID: 21985905.
  17. Cui Y, Dyvorne H, Besa C, Cooper N, Taouli B. IVIM Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T. Eur J Radiol Open. 2015;2:123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.08.001. PubMed PMID: 26393236. PubMed PMCID: 4573456.
  18. Barbieri S, Donati OF, Froehlich JM, Thoeny HC. Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion-weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(5):2175-84. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25765. PubMed PMID: 26059232.
  19. Jalnefjord O, Andersson M, Montelius M, Starck G, et al. Comparison of methods for estimation of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f). 2018;31(6):715-23. doi: 10.1007/s10334-018-0697-5. PubMed PMID: 30116979.
  20. While PT. A comparative simulation study of bayesian fitting approaches to intravoxel incoherent motion modeling in diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78(6):2373-87. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26598. PubMed PMID: 28370232.
  21. Ye C, Xu D, Qin Y, Wang L, et al. Estimation of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters using low b-values. PloS One. 2019;14(2):e0211911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211911. PubMed PMID: 30726298. PubMed PMCID: 6364995.
  22. Cho GY, Moy L, Zhang JL, et al. Comparison of fitting methods and b-value sampling strategies for intravoxel incoherent motion in breast cancer. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(4):1077-85. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25484. PubMed PMID: 25302780. PubMed PMCID: 4439397.
  23. Dyvorne H, Jajamovich G, Kakite S, Kuehn B, Taouli B. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion imaging of the liver: optimal b-value subsampling and impact on parameter precision and reproducibility. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(12):2109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.003. PubMed PMID: 25277521. PubMed PMCID: 4254063.
  24. Freiman M, Voss SD, Mulkern RV, et al. In vivo assessment of optimal b-value range for perfusion-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient imaging. Med Phys. 2012;39(8):4832-9. doi: 10.1118/1.4736516. PubMed PMID: 22894409. PubMed PMCID: 3411587.
  25. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29(6):766-76. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.03.004. PubMed PMID: 21549538.
  26. Bertleff M, Domsch S, Weingärtner S, et al. Diffusion parameter mapping with the combined intravoxel incoherent motion and kurtosis model using artificial neural networks at 3 T. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(12):e3833. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3833. PubMed PMID: 28960549.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 109,803
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 242


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب