LinkedIn

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها1,149
تعداد مقالات10,518
تعداد مشاهده مقاله45,416,116
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,291,832
Endarko, Endarko, Pitaloka, Anthonia Wahyu, Inayah, Amalia Alik, Ramadhan, Fakhrusy Rizqy, Kardianto, Kardianto, Rahayuningsih, Betty. (1402). Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), 193-202. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1401
Endarko Endarko; Anthonia Wahyu Pitaloka; Amalia Alik Inayah; Fakhrusy Rizqy Ramadhan; Kardianto Kardianto; Betty Rahayuningsih. "Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 2, 1402, 193-202. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1401
Endarko, Endarko, Pitaloka, Anthonia Wahyu, Inayah, Amalia Alik, Ramadhan, Fakhrusy Rizqy, Kardianto, Kardianto, Rahayuningsih, Betty. (1402). 'Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), pp. 193-202. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1401
Endarko, Endarko, Pitaloka, Anthonia Wahyu, Inayah, Amalia Alik, Ramadhan, Fakhrusy Rizqy, Kardianto, Kardianto, Rahayuningsih, Betty. Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 13(2): 193-202. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1401

Evaluation of 3D Printed Anthropomorphic Head Phantom for Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter

Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
دوره 13، شماره 2، تیر 2023، صفحه 193-202    اصل مقاله (977.03 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Research
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1401
نویسندگان
Endarko Endarko* 1؛ Anthonia Wahyu Pitaloka1؛ Amalia Alik Inayah1؛ Fakhrusy Rizqy Ramadhan1؛ Kardianto Kardianto2؛ Betty Rahayuningsih2
1Department of Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS - Sukolilo Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia
2Balai Pengamanan Fasilitas Kesehatan Gubeng- Surabaya 60286, East Java, Indonesia
چکیده
Background: Calibration of Thermo Luminescent Dosimetry (TLD) in eye lens dosimeter requires a standard phantom. The use of anthropomorphic phantoms in calibration needs evaluation.   
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the angular response of the TLD on the fabricated 3D anthropomorphic head phantom and Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS)- Computed Tomography (CT) dose phantom as a standard phantom irradiated with Cs-137 and to compare the absorbed dose and linear attenuation for both phantoms. Hp(3) analysis, conversion coefficient (hpK(3)), and calibration factor (CF) are also investigated.
Material and Methods: In this experimental study, the fabricated 3D printed anthropomorphic head phantom was analyzed using polylactic acid (PLA) with the skull and then filled with the artificial brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a test phantom. TLD-700H and TLD Reader Harshaw 6600 plus were used to analyze the angular response of Cs-137 radiation and to determine the absorbed dose and linear attenuation coefficient of test and standard phantoms. 
Results: The effect of the angle of radiation source towards TLD reading at the anthropomorphic head phantom has a similar value to the standard phantom with a calibration factor ranging from 0.82 to 1. The absorbed dose measurement and the linear attenuation coefficient of the anthropomorphic head phantom with the standard phantom have different values of 2.52 and 3.78%, respectively.  
Conclusion: The fabricated 3D printed anthropomorphic head phantom has good potential as an alternative to standard phantoms for TLD calibration in eye lens dosimeter.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Calibration؛ Dosimetry؛ Phantom؛ Thermoluminescent Dosimetry؛ Radiation
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(1-2):1-322. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001. PubMed PMID: 22925378.
  2. Carinou E, Ferrari P, Bjelac OC, Gingaume M, Merce MS, O’Connor U. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review. J Radiol Prot. 2015;35(3):R17-34. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17. PubMed PMID: 26343787.
  3. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Statement on Tissue Reactions [Internet]. 2011. Available from: https://www.icrp.org/docs/2011 Seoul.pdf.
  4. Chevallier MA, Rannou A, Villagrasa C, Clairand I. Risk of eye lens radiation exposure for members of the public. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;168(1):11-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv011. PubMed PMID: 25737581.
  5. Carinou E. IAEA Tec Doc-1731 ‘Implications for Occupational Radiation Protection of the New Dose Limit for the Lens of the Eye’. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;171(4):554-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw253. PubMed PMID: 27927877.
  6. Altaf WJ, Taha MT, Hassan RA, Bahashwan YM. Calibration of TLD in Eye Lens Dosimeter. J Nucl Tech Appl Sci. 2017;5:87-94.
  7. Behrens R. Air kerma to Hp(3) conversion coefficients for a new cylinder phantom for photon reference radiation qualities. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):450-5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs032. PubMed PMID: 22434922.
  8. International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code Of Practice. Technical Reports Series No. 457; Vienna: IAEA; 2007.
  9. Wang K, Ho C-C, Zhang C, Wang B. A Review on the 3D Printing of Functional Structures for Medical Phantoms and Regenerated Tissue and Organ Applications. Engineering. 2017;3(5):653-62. doi: 10.1016/j.Eng.2017.05.013.
  10. Skull and Face [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.embodi3d.com/files/category/12-skull-and-face/.
  11. Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. Ann ICRP. 2009;39(2):1-164. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2009.09.001. PubMed PMID: 19897132.
  12. Vital KD, Mendes BM, De Sousa Lacerda MA, Da Silva TA, Ferreira Fonseca TC. Development of a physical head phantom using of a solid brain equivalent tissue for the calibration of the 18F-FDG internal monitoring system. Radiat Phys Chem. 2019;155:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.037.
  13. Shiobara R, Ohira T, Doi K, Nishimura M, Kawase T. Development of Artificial Cerebrospinal Fluid: Basic Experiments, and Phase II and III Clinical Trials. Brain Tumor J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2013;4:173. doi: 10.4172/2155-9562.1000173.
  14. Tawil RA, Pontikos P, Szalanczy A, Velbeck K, Bruml W, Rotunda JE. Thermoluminescent characteristics of new pre-calibrated dosimeters (TLD) in commercially available readers for selected applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1994;353:411-4. doi: 10.1016/0168-9002(94)91687-X.
  15. Moscovitch M. Personnel Dosimetry Using LiF: Mg, Cu, P. Radiat Protec Dosim. 1999;85(1-4):49-56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032904.
  16. Sadeghi M, Sina S, Faghihi R. Investigation of LiF, Mg and Ti (TLD-100) Reproducibility. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015;5(4):217-22. PubMed PMID: 26688801. PubMed PMCID: PMC4681467.
  17. Hasabelrasoul HA. Estimation of uncertainty in TLD calibration. Sudan Academy of Sciences (SAS); Sudan: Atomic Energy Council; 2013.
  18. Lewis V, Woods M, Burgess P, Green S, Birmingham R, et al. The Assessment of Uncertainty in Radiological Calibration and Testing. The Assessment of Uncertainty in Radiological Calibration and Testing. United Kingdom: National Physical Laboratory; 2005.
  19. ICRP publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. PubMed PMID: 18082557.
  20. Attix FH. Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry. New York: Wiley; 1986.
  21. Okkalidis N, Chatzigeorgiou C, Okkalides D. Assessment of 11 Available Materials With Custom Three-Dimensional-Printing Patterns for the Simulation of Muscle, Fat, and Lung Hounsfield Units in Patient-Specific Phantoms. J Engand Sci Med. 2018;1(1). doi: 10.1115/1.4038228.
  22. Kamalian S, Lev MH, Gupta R. Computed tomography imaging and angiography - principles. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;135:3-20. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53485-9.00001-5. PubMed PMID: 27432657.
  23. Osborne T, Tang C, Sabarwal K, Prakash V. How to interpret an unenhanced CT Brain scan. Part 1: Basic principles of Computed Tomography and relevant neuroanatomy. South Sudan Medical Journal. 2016;9:67-9.
  24. Bera G, Gellie G, Jamet E, Entine F, Michel X. Eye Lens Radiation Exposure of Workers during Medical Interventional Procedures and Surgery. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;182(3):323-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncy068. PubMed PMID: 30590843.
  25. Geber T, Gunnarsson M, Mattsson S. Eye lens dosimetry for interventional procedures - Relation between the absorbed dose to the lens and dose at measurement positions. Radiat Meas. 2011;46(11):1248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.07.028.
  26. O’Connor U, Gallagher A, Malone L, O’Reilly G. Occupational radiation dose to eyes from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures in light of the revised eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1022):20120289. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120289. PubMed PMID: 23385992. PubMed PMCID: PMC3608047.
  27. Nazaroh C, Pardi TB, Irma DR. Observation against Lif: Mg, Cu, P dosimeter which will be used as an eye lens dosimeter for measurement of Hp (3). Nuclear Safety Seminar; Indonesia: IAEA; 2016. Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/50/022/50022741.pdf.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 19,106
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 393


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب